Unparliamentary adjectives rti act

 In the backdrop of the above a humble whisle blower wrote an RTI application and after years of bureaucratic apathy and

red tapism 

the matter was finally heard on 20th May 2013

When the order of central information commission was communicated to RTI applicant he was shocked

to find that he was alleged of using "unparliamentary adjective" against a well known bribe taker of insurance

company,apparently incited by insurance company First appellate authority who flew personally from Mumbai

to Delhi instead of attending video conference from Mumbai.

As per a broad estimate  public money of about Rs. one million was released to alleged corrupt official consequent

to his act of bribe taking by way of salary,wage revision etc, He deserved immediate dismissal,however,had he been

put to suspension half of the public  money (about Rs. 5 lakh) might have been saved.

Attached RTI application has been filed in the matter seeking information of specific so called unparliamentary adjective.

I have got CBI confidental letter addressed to insurance company which I reserve in case of defamation litigation against me

Relevant set of RTI application,appeal,second appeal is attached.

Technical glitche may be cause of not uploading  in earlier attempt

file PIL oir complaint to CVC against the3 chariman

The attached reply of CPIO,Central Information Commission states there is no reocrd available with CIC in respect of how the Central Information Commissioner took a " serious note" of so called unparliamentary adjective used by RTI appellant for one of the well known bribe takers of insurance company