when confidential information is downloaded and leaked,accused is not entitled to get anticipatory bail
I am of the considered view that petitioner is not entitled to concession of pre-arrest bail. Allegations levelled are serious. Petitioner was amongst the top management of the company. He was privy to all confidential information. In such capacity, he was in a position to harm the interest of the complainant company. Allegedly, he developed a dishonest intention. Thus for promoting his own business interests, he used confidential information available with him and parted with same. The complainant company got information only through a client in USA when said client received an identical proposal from CIBC, Gurgaon as was sent by complainant company. There are certain documents on record to show petitioner's interest in CIBC. Investigating agency seeks custodial interrogation of the petitioner to unravel entire modus CRM-M-4365 of 2012 7 operandi. Reliance placed by the petitioner on the order passed in Satinderjit Singh's case (supra) involving similar offences, is misplaced. Facts of that case were totally different. Moreover, said order merely conferred the concession of pre-arrest bail. It does not lay down any law.
https://www.lawweb.in/2012/10/when-confidential-information-is.html
