Originally posted by :utpala kaur |
" |
typing mistake in the last para of my above post
....
I assume that a girl who gets married goes to the matrimonial home with a hope to live a new and happy life with new people....not to earn money with a stamp of divorcee.
|
" |
Utpalaji, you have the right to make assumptions ! BTW how about your profile ? Who is funding your day to day expenses and your social work ? ... Sorry I was just curious, because not all women have the opportunity to do social work and get funds for their day to day expenses without having to work for it. For example, I have to manage home and job together because I have to earn for my day to day expenses. I am also a woman but I did not use DV Act against my brother / father to get money and instead preffered to work. Yes, I agree that's a matter of personal choice. One has the choice of (mis)using DV Act against anybody but if one chooses to use it, that does not imply that he / she is right !
"Stamp of dicorcee" does not matter to those who are capable and those who know they are not wrong ... It matters to only those who have to earn from it ! And with such lucrative offers that are possible with false litigations , some women could instead prefer the "stamp of divorcee" because that would help them fund their day to day luxurious living and do social work ? Anyway, how did you assume that she will get the stamp of "Divorcee" ? ... Did she tell you that she applied for divorce ? Some of the women getting huge sums of money from husband never actually get the label of "Divorcee". They tell their neighbors and friends that the husband has gone to "Dubai" to hide that they have filed cases against him. Would she really apply for divorce ? "Married" / "Unmarried", "Divorced" are just marital status and cannot indicate anything about a person's character. According to you all ill minded women also become decent the moment they get married ? Just ask yourself, no need to reply !
Anybody who talks about women / men being good / bad in general is just a chuvanist and far from relaity. Even two girls from the same family are not alike. I have accepted what I am in my profile, but now its high time you should accept why you are supporting this wife so much and so blindly ... Again I know the answer, so NO NEED TO REPLY .. I just said "Accept the fact" !
Sorry for replying again ... When you were talking about my profile, it was important to talk about yours too, even as a matter of social etiquette !
Now some chauvanists can threaten me of filing false cases against me... That is what some people do when their own wrong doings start getting exposed ? Now the owner / moderator can also ban me for being neutral / unbiased but I think throughout the thread I was more polite and balanced compared to some people who were getting pleasure in someone's pain. Even as a woman I would not support any acts of violence against not just another woman but infact any other human being. I haven't ever seen men in my family beating their wives / daughters and so I am not against men in general. And yes, I cannot support someone blindly just because she is a woman.