LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Amit (Self employed)     04 October 2012

22 years after transaction, uncle claiming birth right in pr

 

Hello, 
 
Brief : After the death of my father, his brothers are claiming to have share in his property. They did not ask for it for 22 years. Apart from this land, all other lands and assets were equally divided by my grandfather. 
 
1) My Grandfather - now deceased (A) divided his agricultural property equally between his sons and his daughters somewhere around 1980s. Although to afford the education and well-being of the all the son, “A” gave one acre of land to someone (B) on lease for 10000 rupees dated 1978. I have the documents for the lease, in hindi its written as "baya kar di he, bech di he" for 90 years. 
 
2) Somewhere around 1985 my father now deceased (C) paid 50000/- and got the land back to "A’s" name. This was openly discussed among all claimants of "A" and none had money, so everyone agreed whoever pays money will enjoy the land. Only issue was just to keep family above personal life "C" got this land back on "A’s" name.
 
3) In 1991 "A" realized the mistake and got this land transferred to "C" name in tehsildar's office and once again no one objected. Decree was carried out in 1991 for this and my A was present in front of tehsildar.
 
4) Now as the value of property has gone up, two bothers of "C" want the share as they claim to have birth right on the land.
 
Their Claim: 
1) "C" played fraud and for "A" signature on blank papers when he was ill and not in good state and got the land transferred to his name. 
 
2) That the C's brothers did not know about this transection until last year (22 years later) whereas everyone knew about it. Half of the village is witness to this.
 
 
My Questions: 
1) Is there anything like mercy that should be considered here? Everyone agreed to this transaction as they were all in good jobs and “A” asked C to help him in agriculture and did not send him to school. “A” has worked in farms throughout his life. We have the Kabza on the land from last 30 odd years and have been farming on this land. “A” widow is also uneducated and dependent on farming. 
 
2) Now “A” transferred land to C in full sense in front of tehsildaar, isn't it legal? 
 
3) Land is currently on the legal heirs of “C”. 
I might have missed some details here, please let me know any question you may have.
 
 
Thanks for your help !


Learning

 2 Replies

To_B_Lawyer (Student)     04 October 2012

Hi, I'm a law student and although my legal knowledge is meagre as compared to other practicing lawyers here, i think as per the Indian Limitation Act (we still havent covered this in college), the ownership of the property cannot be challenged after this long a period. (Limitation Act gives a deadline after which any person cannot challenge the validity of any legal transaction/document). Secondly, the burden of proving that your grandfather was "forced" to sign the papers is now on your uncle. Court assumes validity of any legal document signed in front of a govt. officer appointed for that purpose (in this case tehsildar).

 

So dont worry, you have a good case according to me!!

Amit (Self employed)     04 October 2012

Hello dear, 

Appreciate your inputs. Want to add a point in here :

 

1) Suit is filed by two uncles in same application. One of the uncle has mentioned  that he was serving in BSF and did not know about the transection. He only got to know about it after death of C (my father) when he inquired about it. This is completely false. He knew about it starting from day one.

 

2) Does witnesse and gawaah matters/considered in such cases. I have atleast 20 people from my village who can testify this. 


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register