LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

kushendra (student)     23 June 2012

Mutual back out from property deal

Hello, I Am in a dilemma. The thing is that my mother sold her house 2 months. An agreement was made 2 months between her and the buyer. The buyer gave 10% as token money or 'bayana' and a date was written on agreement on which final payments would be done. 
Meanwhile in between , indian government has cancelled all the deals through power of attorney and only freehold deals are to be done. Now, in order to carry on with the deal, the buyer came and suggested to freehold our flat for which he will pay the money and all necessary expenses whenever freehold is done but will cut back a certain amount of money(15% of freeholding amount). So we agreed. 
On the date of payment, What he wrote in agreement(sale deed) are these clauses which forbade us to accept the agreement:

1. He didnt mention the 15% amount to be cut in the agreement.

2. He wrote a clause stating that freeholding responsibility is completely ours and he will only pay the expenses to be incurred and till its not done he wont pay our remaining amount.

Now neither he nor us have any clue if power of attorney deals will be revived or not  and when will it occur. So accepting the agreement would mean we take responsibilty to freehold it and so we didnt sign it.

Now, on the day of payment because he was not agreeing to change the clause and we were not ready to accept, it was kind of mutual cancellation of deal through word of mouth. And he asked for his bayana back. My qoestions are as follows:

1. Are we liable to return the bayana amount? When the initial agreement was signed between both parties no clause of freehold was there. 

2. how much time can we ask from to return the bayana amount? We have actually invested it somewhere else and so we need time to repay. He told us to return him money in a week.

Please answer my queries.



Learning

 3 Replies

Adv.R.P.Chugh (Advocate/Legal Consultant (rpchughadvocatesupremecourt@hotmail.com))     24 June 2012

I am not taking the subsequent agreement in consideration. The first agreement lapsed or discharged by frustration. It is not legally impossible - when an agreement is rendered legally impossible, then parties stand discharged from performing it, and are restored to the position which they would have been had they not entered the agreement, hence now return on bayana has to be made. You can work out a solution with the buyer with respect to that. If he acts legally, defend by help of a legal expert. 

Adv.R.P.Chugh (Advocate/Legal Consultant (rpchughadvocatesupremecourt@hotmail.com))     24 June 2012

I am not taking the subsequent agreement in consideration. The first agreement lapsed or discharged by frustration. It is not legally impossible - when an agreement is rendered legally impossible, then parties stand discharged from performing it, and are restored to the position which they would have been had they not entered the agreement, hence now return on bayana has to be made. You can work out a solution with the buyer with respect to that. If he acts legally, defend by help of a legal expert. 

kushendra (student)     24 June 2012

Thanks a lot Mr.Bharat..  i have one more query.

Now its obvious that we have to return the bayana money but we need a little time to return it, like 3 months, if the other party is not agreeing to this and saying that they need the money within a week, what can i do? Can i a render a notice stating that i need appropraite amount or we are totally at mercy of the other party? 


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register