Cyber crime 66a - identity theft

Your case as  stated by you is a complicated one and falling under Cyber Crime Laws, Indian Penal Code and Law of Evidence so you need an expert Senior Lawyer to create a suitable strategy to take you out from the allegations.

If you have decided to contest her case as party in person and challenge all her allegations, you may have to work out very hard, you may take clues from senior advocates as advised by senior advocate respected Mr. Roy sir.

Kalaiselvan sir, thanks for your concerns.

I experienced about lot many things after I appointed and terminated my lawyer. And replies to my query from respected Mr. Roy sir and you, I found key words from your replies that I can see confidently and certainly challenge all her allegations because I am the only person who genuinely aware about facts. 

I probably need to know law procedures to represent myself. But I am sure that I can bring out about all the facts from her mouth through her sayings in the cross examination. Lets see how it goes !! ..I made my preparations.

Thanking you once again

Go through Supreme Court Judgement on Section 66 A

It is not an easy task to conduct this case in person. From the given facts as I could understand  is that the person who will conduct this case in defense must have thorough knowledge in Cyber Laws , Code of Criminal Procedure, Indian Penal Code, and Evidence Act.  Also he must know the jugglery of cross examination.  Besides if the person who will take part to combat in defense possess some knowledge in Cyber Crime Laws and related cases of ENGLAND & U.S.A it will be an added advantage to him to win the case .definitely..

If the allegations against you u/s. 506 and 509 RELATES TO AND CONSEQUENTIAL to the alleged offence u/s. 66A  of the IT Act then the case is liable to be rejected, since Sec.66 A  was declared as violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India as declared by The Division Bench of The Supreme Court of India in a PIL case yesterday.

But crime related cases are still there,they have not been waived. Even objectionable social net works are not exempted.

When sec.66 A  of the IT Act was declared as bad in law anything related to is also bad.  Although complainant can enjoy option to invoke some other sections of the IPC. against the alleged offender.

Arvind ji,  

Arvind ji,  the most important piece of evidence to save you are the emails exchanged between you and your ex-lover as you have already confessed that you deleted emails in her account per her instructions.

Now, I am not sure if you ex has committed/confessed that she wrote those emails, but it seems that she will certainly refuse. If the Cyber cell has not looked at the origination of those emails and you have not got the cyber cell to investigate the veracity , integrity of the those emails, then that evidence is as good as lost.

Also, have the call records got frozen for you and your ex for the confirmation of the calls which you are referring to for giving you the password?

Please understand that these are only two points in the circumstantial evidence that I am bringing in front of you from the query you provided.

Many such procedural, evidentiary and substantive points need to be sifted from the FACTS of your case.

I understand that you had a bad experience with a lawyer, but lawyers are as human as everyone else, some good and some not that good.

You need a good lawyer to defend you here, as already suggested by Roy sir and Kalaiselvan sir.

Rightly analysed by Mr. R.G.Singh

If it can be proved that that she herself compromised with the password and provoked you to do the deletion act and also what are other facts of matter, case can be certainly made up in your favor.You can contact info@cyberorgindia.com for more detailed discussion.

Thanks a ton to all the advisers replied to my query.

My reply to all the advisers who replied back to my query.

I have been understanding the system of the law, procedures, sections and etc etc. I have been making my research approaching legal persons who are my uncles, aunties and my legal advocates friends and being guided by the legal advisers through these kind of forums. Thanks once again.

Yes, I have all the documentary and physical evidences to prove about my innocence and her criminal mind-set. Certainly, I will prepare and gain full knowledge only concern to my case that how to perform in the trial before it is conducted.

Its because of India, she has been taking the women privileges from the Indian constitution even though she is a culprit, let her enjoy her honey moon period, but end of the day I will put her into the prison because even I filed a private case on her in my district court  under IPC sections 384, 506, 425, 499 and 500. Case was registered on her and summons were issued to her but she approached to the high court for quash. I  responded based on the notice received from the high court saying not to allow her quash petition and I filed quash petition against my case filed by her, now all the cases connected together and became one file in the high court. Any how its not going to happen in her favour because I filed a genuine case with all physical and documentary evidences. Now the status in the high court is pending since more than one year.

She herself destroyed her life and her parents destroyed her life too, not me. Nothing loss going to happen to me end of the day.

Arvind, when she disclosed the password to you through phone then you made a mistake by opening her email. You should have been wise in the first step just by recording the call and giving it to Police without opening her email OR  If you failed to record the call then you should have told the password in Court and not the Police because Court is the final step not the Police.

We must always learn to be wise.

Hello Peter,

I never expected that she is going to make a complaint based on that, she intentionally and with her criminal mind-set made me get into trouble. 

But god is there, I will be certainly protected by the god. Because, I'm saying this, that she left lot many evidences that she intentionally did so and wanted to destroy my life through making me involve in multiple cases. 

Yes, I disclosed the password whatever I was provided by her during the investigation to the police, the police noted it in my statement of paper and submitted to the court. I will pray to the court to issue an order to the Google to generate reports that the same password was used by her or not. If she wouldn't have provided to me then how I would know it. Likewise, I will get truths from her mouth out during the cross examination even though I didn't record her voice during she was disclosing the password.

She wanted me to sign into her email, there was a conversation going on during the time. 

Peter, still there is a big story behind these cases, I can't put everything here, because I'm lazy in typing lengthy paragraphs.

I'm just posting here the necessary points to get clarifications, guidance and wishes from the legal advisers.