@ Author
No one in matrimonial cases of stated nature comes as barrier to Constitutional guaranteed FREEDOM of a person.
However U/s 10 Indian Passport Act if there is a criminal case pending then with reasoning placed by your side before concerned Court, impounding of passport may be argued. The Law favors weaker party i.e. wife ! Here we hear of just two civil cases in hand; one filed by you U/s. 9 HMA and the other filed by lady U/s 125 CrPC now remotely she has already show caused weaker gender status quo before Court. Now think where Law will lean judiciously J J J
Well remedy (i.e. taking Lord Hanuman's leap in matrimonial cases) is always there in Law for vigilant oops to be now read as litigating (here and see the fun of such usage English as now meaning dramatically changes perceptively you know) litigant(s), hence, probably all that can be (i.e. as altrernate releif pressed for at this stage is speeding –up the process of the Courts and/or speeding trial proceedings in respective cases by drawing inference that once interim U/s 125 CrPC awarded (if any by concerned Court) the Applicant may delay coming to witness box to give her evidence and anyhow it is not in best interest of other spouse to linger – on adjudication on his Conjugal rights hence grant daily hearing now that she has a passport in hand and I heard from reliable sources that she is finalizing plans to leave the country by giving POA to service her cases!
BTW one can even seek written undertaking from her in days Order Sheet by directing her to make a statement that she will not leave Jurisdiction of Court without leave of Court / make an express direction and would make available herself as and when required. Here her signature on left side of making of the statement made under days Order sheet is a must.