LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anil Agrawal (Retired)     26 May 2010

Meritorious Service

Sec.354 prescribes a maximum of 2 years prison. The trial court awarded Rathore 6 months. On appeal, it has been enhanced to one and a half years.

My question is how much discretion Magistrate and District Judge have in awarding sentences? They can't go beyond 2 years but go down even to the rising of the court!

Read this what the Judge said about Rathore:

 Keeping in view his age, his medical background, a dependent unmarried daughter who is suffering from congenital heart problem, his meritorious service record and the fact that he spent more than 200 dates in the court during the trial.

If these are allowed, why not the section 354 and other sections prescribe what are the conditions on which the sentence can be reduced?



Learning

 7 Replies

Anil Agrawal (Retired)     26 May 2010

Is Rathore an ordinary person? He is a retired DGP, living in a palatial bungalow with a hefty pension and bank balance. He and his family is entitled to the best possible medical treatment from PGI, Chandigarh, free of charge. His wife is a renowned lawyer in her own right.

How are these mitigating circumstances in awarding a lesser punishment?

Anil Agrawal (Retired)     26 May 2010

Discretion is the problem in India.

Anil Agrawal (Retired)     26 May 2010

I understand that Rathore' police medal has been taken back by the Government and we are still talking of meritorious service. What an irony?

Arup (UNEMPLOYED)     26 May 2010

·        IPC - Of hurt.

Section 354. Assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty.--Whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any woman, intending to outrage or knowing it to be likely that he will there by outrage her modesty, shall be punished with imprisonment of either descripttion for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

·        From - CRPC 1ST SCHEDULE.

Chapter xvi – Offences against the human body.

 Section – IPC 354’

Offence – assult or use of criminal force to a woman with intent to outrage her modesty.

Punishment – Imprisonment for 2 years or fine or both.

Cognizable or non-cognizable – Cognizable.

Bailable or non-bailable – Bailable.

By what court triable – Any Magistrate.

Arup (UNEMPLOYED)     26 May 2010

For reduction of punishment Judge said about Rathore –

·        (I) Keeping in view his age – Valid ground.

·        (II) His medical background – valid ground.

·        (III) A dependent unmarried daughter who is suffering from congenital heart problem – Unvalid ground. 

·        (IV) His meritorious service record – Unvalid ground. 

·        (V) The fact that he spent more than 200 dates in the court during the trial. – Unvalid ground.

*Is it 200 dates in the court during the tria or 200 days in jail? If he is already in jail, then it is a valid ground, and the amount will be less otherwise invalid.

Bhartiya No. 1 (Nationalist)     26 May 2010

His track record and his qualification/post etc. are actually, disqualification. His pension and other facilities should also be withdrawn. With keeping his post/service in mind he should be severely punished. A police is to protect a weak person and if he only commit offence on a weak subject then what will happen? The judge who has passed such an observation/remark too shoud be disqualified.

It is a matter of shame for whole of the country.

Arup (UNEMPLOYED)     27 May 2010

For reduction of punishment Judge said about Rathore –

·        (I) Keeping in view his age – Valid ground.

·        (II) His medical background – valid ground.

·        (III) A dependent unmarried daughter who is suffering from congenital heart problem – Unvalid ground.

·        (IV) His meritorious service record – Unvalid ground

·        (V) The fact that he spent more than 200 dates in the court during the trial. – Unvalid ground.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register