LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

(plaintiff)flat owner passed away - his married daughter asking to add as plaintiff

(Querist) 06 April 2014 This query is : Resolved 
Hello i am the defendant (tenant) and recently (Plaintiff)Flat owner passed away. So as legal hire plaintiff's son have asked to add put his name & plaintiff's married daughter name in the title.
Son is fine as he do stay there, but why will married daughter addition shall be asked if she doesn't even stay at suit premises? Is this valid ask? Shall i suggest my lawyer to object addition of her to the plaintiff list?
This is an evac case and in addition to above plaintiff also asked that married daughters building is going for redevelopment and hence this is additional reason for daughter and her family to stay at plaintiff's house and hence require the suite premises.
My lawyer suggests that we cannot do much for this point. so wanted to take the experts suggestion if there is a way in which we can put a counter argument to this point?

Sorry for the long post, but wanted to explain the scenario. Thank you.
Devajyoti Barman (Expert) 06 April 2014
Professional query....
Advocate M.Bhadra (Expert) 06 April 2014
This is the matter of plaintiff side,ORDER 22, RULE 3 CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE AND ARTICLE 12 0 LIMITATION ACT
WHEN THE PLAINTIFF DIED IN A PENDING SUIT, THE LEGAL HEIRS ARE TO BE BROUGHT AS PLAINTIFFS IN THE ABOVE SUIT WITHIN 90 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE DEATH OF PLAINTIFF , AS PER ART.120 OF LIMITATION ACT.
Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 07 April 2014
She can be added if a legal heir.
Vidhi Joshi (Expert) 07 April 2014
On basis of being legal heir.
ajay sethi (Expert) 07 April 2014
both son and daughter can be added
Guest (Expert) 07 April 2014
Rightly advised.
niky...... (Querist) 07 April 2014
Thank you very much everyone for your answer.

For my second query, "daughters building is going for redevelopment, so extra members will be there in plaintiffs house which is not enuf hence the owner (plaintiff) require suite premises " ?
This is yet another false reason plaintiff is trying to put forward to confiscate our house. And even if it was true, that should be a temporary stay for her? or will court consider this in favor of plaintiff's space requirement?
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Expert) 08 April 2014
All the legal heirs of the deceased plaintiff are to be added as necessary parties (plaintiffs) for proper adjudication, you cannot object to this. The plaintiffs can state any reason for vacating the tenant from the sit premise, you place your counter accordingly.


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :