u/S 190
Anil Vishwakarma
(Querist) 11 October 2016
This query is : Resolved
Sir,
I have filed criminal case u/s190 in person, can u suggest me about this case I filed 156(3) under this application 2 individual and 2 police person,
1.at least 90 days require for hold/notice before this informed IG, recent notification as told my Advocate.
2.Any u have idea of any reference sec in which section say that not require,
3.because I have filed application 3 days after 1 hearing
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 11 October 2016
Please redraft your query, so that it can give clear picture.
adv.bharat @ PUNE
(Expert) 11 October 2016
Anil ji please put fact of case clearly and in sequence.
Anil Vishwakarma
(Querist) 11 October 2016
Sir, I have filed 156(3) under 190, in which 2 person individual and 2 police officer.
Our Advocate says that, magistrate can not passed order agst police officer, due to recent notification issued by Maharashtra police at least 90 days require from date of informed to IG.
I am not satisfied, because their was no notification found and 90 days period.
I have filed 1st application letter 1st week of June to CM,DG, Sp,of Maharashtra police.
IG designation found below the DG.
2)I request you,please advice me, under 190, /S 156(3), request magistrate to F.I.R and investigations give to CID, instead same police station.
(3) Advocate says, that magistrate has not any rights to pass on Cid and 90 days require from date informed IG.
Guest
(Expert) 12 October 2016
You have not discussed anything about the background of the case.
Bt the way, what was the real issue for which you have to file case u/s 190?
adv.bharat @ PUNE
(Expert) 12 October 2016
Anil
1)u/s 190 Magistrate is empowered to take cognisance of offence.
2) there is no such amendment for waiting period of 90 days. You can ask him copy of such amendent. If you got it put in this forum also.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 12 October 2016
Author, please reply the questions from expert P.S. Dhingra ji.
Anil Vishwakarma
(Querist) 12 October 2016
Thanku adv , Bharat, but rest my dear expert, I am not Advocate, so that on which questions u will reply or not,
When asked every time got some excuse given you.
Academic query,
Elaborate fact of the case.
Etc many answers
I am C.A final student, if u come our CA club india , their u will not found any excuse.
Conclusion: This Lawyer club india not benefiable and you are giving those answers is general , which I also know reading barr. act C R P C.
Guest
(Expert) 12 October 2016
Mr. Anil Vishwakarma,
As a CA, without any background data, would you be able to finalise the accounts of any firm or audit them to form you opinion about the accounts status of the correctness of the accounts?
If I asked you, "what was the real issue for which you have to file case u/s 190" what was wrong in that?
When you are not able to reply a genuine question that clearly proves that you did not have any problem and asked solution to your really academic query merely on guess work.
If you feel "lawyer club india not benefiable and you are giving those answers is general," why do you still post your questions without any background history of the case? For academic queries, you can expect only general answers.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 12 October 2016
Everyone is free to form opinion, however, without facts, no useful reply can be extended in any legal matter.
No two form can / need to be compared, all may have positive and negative aspects / customs.
Inspite of commenting, it would been better to provide required information.
Rest depend on you.
Guest
(Expert) 12 October 2016
Well said ........
