Adoption
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 27 September 2011
This query is : Resolved
a divorce wife married after get the decree by court. she has one child by 1st married.now is she recquired adoption with his 2nd marriage for legal view? if yes then any procedure by which they save from un wanted harash which may be creates by 1st marriage's husband when they go for adoption with proper (summon) procedure...
R.Ramachandran
(Expert) 28 September 2011
It is her own child. No adoption is required.
Guest
(Expert) 28 September 2011
She is the real mother of her child. So, she does not have any need to adopt her own child.
Shonee Kapoor
(Expert) 28 September 2011
It seems the question is more related to defeat/ block the claim of first husband on the child.
Sadly the same is not permissible in law.
Regards,
Shonee Kapoor
harassed.by.498a@gmail.com
Guest
(Expert) 28 September 2011
Dear Shonee,
If the querist does not want to divulge relevant information, how we can presume at our own that he has asked with the intention just to block the claim of the husband on the child?
R.Ramachandran
(Expert) 28 September 2011
Dear Mr. Dhingra,
It is quite obvious to the discerning lawyer.
Guest
(Expert) 28 September 2011
Respected Ramachandran ji,
May that be as per your opinion, but the querist is also required to state full facts, if he or she wants proper solution as per law. On the face of the query, I don't think yours or my earlier answers are wrong.
R.Ramachandran
(Expert) 28 September 2011
Dear Mr. Dhingra,
Agreed. Both of us are quite right in our earlier answers to the query.
Even Mr. Shonee Kapoor did not say that we are wrong. But he went one step ahead, visualised the real/possible intention of the querist and gave his views. That's all.
I confined myself to the query in hand. If that straight answer puts paid to the intention of the querist, that is sufficient as far as I am concerned.
Sailesh Kumar Shah
(Expert) 28 September 2011
Section 11(i) of the HAMA,1956 bars to adoption.
Guest
(Expert) 28 September 2011
Dear Shri Ramachandran,
Based on the observation of Shonee, I do agree with his contention and have no point of difference about his answer.
My main concern, however, was about the intentions of the querists or their wrong feedback about the information, who normally keep the experts in dark by avoiding to give any background of their questions. In fact they don't realise what harm they are doing only to themselves by extracting wrong replies from the experts, while I am sure they won't hesitate to blame the experts for being wrong, may that be due to their own wrong feeding of information.
You can very well see, even after our discussion on the validity of question and answers, the querist has least bothered to give any clarification.
R.Ramachandran
(Expert) 28 September 2011
Dear Mr. Dhingra Saheb,
Mai aap ki baath mantha hum.
Fir bhi kya karen, yeh hamari vidambana hai.
Vijayarajan
(Expert) 28 September 2011
There is no question of adoption in this case. The lady has to get a court order to keep the child with her, if the father has a dispute.
Guest
(Expert) 28 September 2011
Ramachandran ji, I 100% agree with your observation. We have to face such type of half baked or twisted facts through the questions asked to the experts.
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 28 September 2011
Such querist should be thanked by all of us experts who provide us opportunity to interact with each other and bring us closer.
prabhakar singh
(Expert) 29 September 2011
Mr. Makkad! This time you did not say 'HARI ANNAT HARI KATHA ANNATAA'
tHaNkS 2 QUESTIONER ANY WAY WHO NOW NEEDS NO FOCUS.
