Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 22 April 2013
The question is not of acceptability but of remedial measures. If you think you are aggrieved by this order you can challenge the order in the supreme court. Otherwise you have to follow what has been directed.
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 22 April 2013
Nothing can be commented except to go against the impugned order before DB of Bombay High court. Why are you silent till 3 years against the impugned order?
Guest
(Expert) 10 December 2014
Well Attended
Anirudh
(Expert) 10 December 2014
SHAME ON THIS FELLOW TO ATTEND THIS ONE YEAR OLD QUERY.
HE IS TRYING ALL THESE GIMMICS TO HIDE HIS FALSE AND FRADULENT PROFILE.
This fellow cannot even be a last person one can consult for any advice.
This fellow is good for nothing. Many a times he gives advices which are not supported by law.
TAKE THIS FELLOWS FALSITY IN HIS PROFILE. THIS FELLOW ATTACHES MORE IMPORTANCE TO THE PROFILE, WHILE HE IS FILLING UP TOTAL FALSE HOOD IN HIS PROFILE.
where he claims that he is practising from 2001, while as already indicated by me, he was enrolled only in the year 2012!!! CAN ANYBODY PRACTICE BEFORE ENROLMENT? IF ONE DOES SUCH A PRACTICE IS HE NOT FIT TO BE CALLED A "FRAUD"?
N.J.S.Rajkumar alias narasimha's Details Listed Under Business Law Civil Law Criminal Law Practicing Since 2001 Specialization SEBI and SEBI RELATED CASES Court Others Address 54,PARASURAMA EASWARAN KOIL WEST MADA STREET,AYANAVARAM,CHENNAI 600023 Other Details rajkumar_wins@rediffmail.com 9444036927
Therefore, before taking advice, the querist should be too careful
Trouble Logging in? Try following the given steps -
1. Visit your inbox to find a confirmation mail from LAWyersClubIndia.
2. Click on the confirmation link and confirm your signup