Anonymous
17 April 2010 at 23:26
How can Paper possession about 13 years before execution of lease deed in 2006, be equated to physical possession by state development agancy only to justify demand penalty for delay / default in timely construction of industrial building within 2-3 years of lease execution, whereas the actual handing over of possession at-site has all along been demanded / ordered for the individual allottee / lessee ?
What is the justification of MCD requiring NOC from Allotment Agency even after execution of Lease Deed after paper possession ?
What could be the suggested quicker mode for forcing the State agencies to allow construction over the allotted plot ?
Anonymous
17 April 2010 at 23:10
July, 2008 saw the death of owner's father who accompanied by owner's brother / family had been residing in independant house in NCTD with written understanding that any body living with the father, during his lifetime, would not have any right to stay in the premises after July, 2008;
But, the brother / family, has been continuing to possess / enjoy the residence without any permission / express consent of the owner, so far, simply because the owner does not want to disrespect his elder greedy brother, who has manipulated Father's property, leaving nothing to be bequeathed by father, during their living together, thereby depriving all other legal heirs of their legitimate rightful share in the assets / property of the deceased father, who did fear such manipulations, as recorded in his registered deed of cancellation of all such documents / attorneys, that might have been got signed by the greedy brother;
How can justice prevail in trhe absaence of better sences with such greedy brother ?
Samson
17 April 2010 at 22:48
Hi,
i have a land of 300 sqyds(60 feet X 45 feet) and the owners of the plot behind our plot have occupied part of our land to the extent of 4 feet X 45 feet.
We stay far away from the land and never bothered to actually check the boundaires before, now we decided to built the house and asked a private surveyor to survey our land and he said that our plot ahs been occupied to the above said extent.
Please advise what should be our course of action as the other plot owners are reluctant to release the land to us.
Thanks you so much in advance for your advise and help.
Thanks,
Samson
Govind
17 April 2010 at 21:23
My query relates to a piece of farm land that belongs to my late father. All revenue records (patta etc) are still held jointly under my father's name and his two brothers. Both my uncles are fine with passing title to me. What is the easiest and cost effective way to do this? Please note that one of my uncles is terminally ill but his cognitive abilities are very good. So, obtaining a power of attorney is not a long term solution.
Please advice,
yashi
17 April 2010 at 11:50
I had a deal of a property to buy. but i want to crossverify it.pls tele me how to varify the properti that it is genuine or not. I have Khatoni of that land and it also shows in "Bhulekh" website of UP govn.
The dealer who offer the land says it is a residential land...but i had doubt... pls advice how do i find genuinity of that land.
Anonymous
17 April 2010 at 09:38
We are three brothers and three sisters. My father possessed some inherited property and he sold a about 30% of it before his death and also made a will that after my death my mother and we three brothers all will have will have each 25%share in the leftover property. Before his death he also transferred a shop in the name of one of my brothers, which he acquired through HUDA allotment. My query is that how mothers share is justified, when father sold his share, secondly how we can put claim for the shop transferred in the name of one brther?. Thanks
Kumar Krishan Agarwal Advocate
17 April 2010 at 01:07
Dear Sir,
1. If a wife has a house on her only name and she has two children after the death of the wife will the husband will also become co-owner of the wife house with her two children ?
Or
The husband has no right after the death of wife and children are the only absolute co-owners of the mother property.
2. What will be the way to bring the wife property on the name of husband only without any interference of the two children in future for safeguard?
Anonymous
16 April 2010 at 15:29
sir , i am prabhakaran from a&n islands.
my father owns a house at portblair , land measuring 122 sq mtr , out of which we constructed house in only 80 sq mtr.
the problem is our neighbor who himself is a (lawyer) raised a compound wall across our boundary in which our land of approx 25 sq mtr is being encroached by him.
regarding this matter i have asked the revenue inspector and patwari to demarc my land 1 yr ago till now , and no action is being taken regarding the issue.
please give your suggestion and tell me the legal steps which i can take against those people.
T.V.Narasa Lakshmi
16 April 2010 at 13:57
sirs, our land case is in SC. Kindly findout what is the position. Our File No: CS.14/58
Plots r in Hyderabad, original saledeeds n E.C's r in our names. V all r 30 people facing problem from one of the Minister's son since 15 yrs. In HC judgement is in our favour. They proceeded to Sc. Now, I want the position of this case.Kindly help me in this regard
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Basis of Maintenance Charges-Row Houses in a CHS in Mumbai
What should be the basis for maintenance charges to Row Houses (RHs) in a CHS which has a mix of both flats and RHs? Should it be based on:
(1) BMC Approved Plan?
(2) Sale Agreement executed between the builder and buyer?
(3) BMC municipal tax assessment, or
(4) any other?
Each row house has been sold under two separate agreements (identified as 101 and 201 respectively) between the builder and the buyer(s). In some cases, owners of 101 and 201 are the same individual(s); in some cases, they are different.
The builder has not yet submitted the BMC approved plan of the RHs to the CHS management. Under these circumstances, how should the maintenance be charged?
In one of the cases of dispute, both units (101 and 201) are held by the same individual(s). The individual(s) claim that although the sale agreements are two, both units are interconnected inside the RH (ground and 1st floor plans of the same RH) and that it's occupied by the same family. Hence it's claimed that the RH be treated as one unit for CHS maintenance cost calculations and accordingly the billing has to be one, not two.
Please advise.