Arka Foundation
04 December 2009 at 14:26
a distance education law graduate, can deal his case in the court
Perumal Prabhu
04 December 2009 at 13:36
One of our party filed a suit and got ex-parte stay. In this stage can we file caveat? please clarify.
S.KARUNAMOORTHY
04 December 2009 at 13:29
WHAT IS THE PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED FOR GETTING THE MONETARY BENEFIT IN CASE OF DEATH OF AN ADVOCATE? AND WHAT IS THE QUANTOM OF AMOUNT?
V Rajasekar
04 December 2009 at 13:10
Pelase clarify that The Divorce through Corut was obtained with surviving Child by a lady in chennai. The child was born in London. Lady re-married wanted renual of the child's passport . While applying her passport was cancelled stating that the order of divorce there was no mention about the Guardianship of the Child. Does this reason stated by passport authorities are right ? or what sort of document proof is necessary for obtaining passport for the child . An Early reply is solicited
Sanjay Sharma
04 December 2009 at 12:28
Dear Experts,
I have a bank account in the name of Sanjay Sharma and another side I have a Insurance policy in the name of Sanjay Kumar Sharma. I have got my refund cheque from the Insurance co. when I deposited this cheque into the bank, Bank has returned objecting that the account holder title is in complete. Pls tell me how to handle this situation.
Regards
Sanjay sharma
Anonymous
04 December 2009 at 11:08
Sir,
When a director of the company who resides in Mumbai, having godown at bhiwandi out of octroi limit and having company office at Thane. Purchase a car in his individual name by giving address of Bhiwandi godown for R.C. book ( RTO Registration).
Now my question is that whether he has to pay Octraoi on the said car in Thane Muncipal Corporation.?
Because he is not living in Thane. He has godown at Bhiwandi and visiting in Thane for office work. Then how he has to pay octroi at Thane Muncipal Corporation.
Alok Kumar
03 December 2009 at 23:12
Dear Legal Expert Friends,
I want to know that whether one claim compensation against private employer (MNC)in court of law if he is getting one-half less salary to others collegues with same experience, designation, qualification, skills, and talents (or even comparatively far better skilled,& experience than most of better paid collegues of same rank in the team)? What can be recource in such case if this is compounded by Company HR policy which says no to high hike in salary this year in anyone's salary? Is this clearcut violation of Article 16(A) ?
Legal experts are requested to advice on the matter!
subramaniam
03 December 2009 at 20:56
dear sir,
I was completed my S.S.L.C then, obtain a valid diploma which has been approved in state government
Now i want to know,
May i applied for the post which has been fixed as Hr.Sec is a mininum qualification.
i.e. Diploma is equal to Hr.Sec or not ?
is there any judgement or G.O. regrading about my quary
raveendran
03 December 2009 at 19:26
I am advocate Raveendran from Coimbatore. I want to attend a cheque case at Kurla and hence I am looking for an advocate based at Kurla. Interested advocates can contact me at 9843232568.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
service matter
Sub. Work relating to construction of cargo berth.
Dy. Chairman & CVO x port trust vide his letter dated --/07/08 had referred to the commission a case relating to the initiation of major penalty proceedings against the 5 officials.
Mr. A
Mr. B
Mr. C
Mr. D
Mr. E
The case was initiated on the basis of the observations of CAG on the work of construction of the cargo berth @ the cost of Rs. 40.98 Crore. The CAG has observed that the port Trust erroneously computed the amount of compensation for delay, thereby causing an undue benefit to the tune of Rs. 1.90 crore to the contractor. The commission, after perusing the report had observed that the commission’s 1st stage advice had not been obtained in this case. The commission, vide its O.M. of even no dated --/08/08 advised port trust to clarify the reasons for not obtaining the 1st stage advice and to expedite the inquiries and finalize the proceedings without delay. Port trust has furnished its reply, vide letter dated--/02/09
The commission has perused the report of port trust and has observed that there was a clear vigilance angle to the case and then chairman & FA&CAO had erred in not referring the case to the port trust Vigilance of the CVC. Now, the case as a composite case and furnish the complete proposals in respect of all officials for commission’s 2nd stage advice, as per the guidelines contained in the commission’s circulars no. -- dated -/-/06 and no. … , dated --/---08
The commission has also conveyed its displeasure to Sh. X the then chairman, port trust, since repatriated to his parent cadre, and Sh. Y the then FA & CAO. Port trust presently working in another port trust, for the failure to refer the case, having a clear vigilance angle, for the 1st stage advice of the commission, even through the official involved were covered under its jurisdiction..
Action taken by the Dept. may be intimated to the commission without undue delay.