Bhasker Thirumala
29 August 2009 at 10:23
Dear Sir or Madam,
We need advise, if any member in a co-op hsg society could run business from his appartment with regards to packing, labelling and storeing food stuffs that he supplies to food malls. He also parks his commercial goods vehicle in the society premises..
1) Can the member run operate such business from his appartment without the approval of the society nor competent authority BMC etc...
2) Is parking a commercial goods vehicle instead of a personal vehicle in the society premises permitted at all.
3) Can the society initiate any legal action against this member who is absolutely non cooperative and what are the steps involved...
APPRECIATE YOUR KIND AND VALUABLE FEEDBACK.
Thanks and kind regards
Bhasker Thirumala
Swapnalok Co-Op society
O. Mahalakshmi
28 August 2009 at 16:23
Avinash Sir,
In MNC companies. As a legal advisor and consultant. To protect the company legally. To give answers for the suits. I dont know well about that because i have just got enrolled in AP Bar Council.
O. Mahalakshmi
28 August 2009 at 15:21
Is there any books to get job gramanyayadhikari.
O. Mahalakshmi
28 August 2009 at 15:20
What are the good books to get a legal consultant job in a well established company(MNC)
Kindly suggest me books
sdkharadkar
28 August 2009 at 10:38
A partition deed was executed by the karta of family between three brothers in the year 1957, the land was divided between three brothers unequally. The partition deed was registered. Later one of the property in the name of karta was showing the name of Karta as Ekatra Kutumb Manager even afetr division in 1957 upto the year 1992. On his death in 1992 the leagl heirs of Karta got their nmaes registered in the records. Can the lagal heirs of other brothers be registered in the property name. Is there any provision to delete the name of Ekatra Kutumb Manager from the records, whether the legal heirs of the other two brothers should have been contacted while the name of Karta, is ther any decided cae law on the matter
gurudutt
27 August 2009 at 23:39
1 ) can the mg. commitee of a hsg. scty.
which has not filed M20 bonds , represent the society in legal courts or file affidavits as representatives.
2 ) what action can be taken against such a mg. commitee which has presented / passsed audit documents in AGM , without the signature of the auditor
Arvind Singh Chauhan
27 August 2009 at 17:12
Sir please help me.
I have confessed under some Sections of M.V.Act. The vehicle was seized by police under Section 207. The case now have been disposed of. My client is not the owner of vehicle. He has bought the vehicle only on a sale letter written in a stamp paper. Thus registered owner his another one.
I am requesting court to release the vehicle to my client. But honorable court is not accepting and is saying that vehicle can be released only to the registered owner. The registered owner is far from this locality and totally unable to reach the court. What should I do?
Avinash kumar seth
27 August 2009 at 10:42
Smt. Asha Arya registered a case FIR 37/2004 dated 18.2.2004 she was on leave from 11th Feb 2003 to 19 April 2003 after joining her duty she wrote two letter both letters were verified in Defense witnesses because in her cross she denied her signature on the letter and said she was not admitted that she wrote two letter to her office on 20.4.2005 those letters are as follows
other information sought under RTI act 2005 i.e. her paper cancelled in the month of N ov. 2002 not in December 2002 her paper started SO grade exam on 27th May 2003 not in the month of 27th June 2003 her result declared on 11.12.2003 not in September 2003. in defence witness her office authority verify this information as per their office record.
Two cheques given to PW6 Mr. V.S. Chauhan one was Rs. 2000/- and another was Rs.5000/- one cheuqe she gave to accused wife Rs. 1100/- but in complaint she told that accused give the cheque and her wife cash the cheque in her account.
PW6 V S Chauhan complaint her in Ps IP Estate against Asha Arya (Complainant) he is on duty and she is on leave on that day on 9.3.2004 PS IP Estate police personal verified that complaint is pending with the PS.
case is State v/s Avinash Kumar Seth (self)
Asha Arya wife of Sh. Satish Chandra, resident of 147-Neb Sarai, New Delhi working as Sr. Auditor in the office of the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi, AGCR Bldg., New Delhi-110002, without any influence and pressure from any body disclose that the contents of FIR No. 37/2004 registered on 18.2.2004 at Mandir Marg Police Station, New Delhi are false and fabricated and the above FIR was lodged by me under extreme pressure and threat to me by my husband. I had no intention to label mean and false allegations on anybody but the pressure and threat of my husband led to all this. As regards misbehaviour with Sh. V.S. Chauhan, P.A. by my husband in the office complex during lunch time on 9.3.2004, I am to state that my husband pressurised me to impose on Sh. V.S. Chauhan false allegations of illegal affairs with me. I did all these things the way my husband wanted me to do. I again reiterate that there is no truth in any of the allegation and these are all fabricated.
Sd/-
20/4/2005
Dated: 20.4.2005 (Asha Arya)
To
Shri V.S. Chauhan
PA to Sr. DAG (Admn.)
true copy attested
Sd/-
Mr. Chaman Bhandari, Sr. AO
o/o AG (Audit) Delhi
AGCR Building, IP Estate
NEW DELH
To
The Sr. Dy. Acctt. General (Admn.),
O/o the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi,
AGCR Bldg.,
NewDelhi-110002
I, Asha Arya wife of Sh. Satish Chandra, resident of 147-Neb Sarai, New Delhi working as Sr. Auditor in the office of the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi, AGCR Bldg., New Delhi without any influence and pressure from an body disclose that the contents of FIR No. 37/2004 registered on 18.2.2004 at Mandir Marg Police Station, New Delhi are false, baseless and fabricated and the above FIR was lodged by me under extreme pressure and threat to me by my husband. I had no intention to label mean and false allegations on anybody but the pressure and threat of my husband led to all this. As regards misbehaviour with Sh. V.S. Chauhan, P.A. by my husband in the office complex during lunch time on 9.3.2004, I am to state that my husband pressurised me to impose on Sh. V.S. Chauhan false allegations of illegal affairs with me. I did all these things the way my husband wanted me to do. I again reiterate that there is no truth in any of the allegation and these are all fabricated. I apologize to the office and Sh. V.S. Chauhan for my wrong doings and I assure you Sir that such type of things will not occur in future.
Sd/-
Dated: 20.04.2005 (ASHA ARYA)
Witness
1 J.B. Gupta
AO (Estt.) Sd/- 20/4/05
2 Jawahar Lal
A.O. (Admn.)
O/o (Audit) Delhi Sd/- 20/4/05
“Sr. DAG (Admn & A/CS)’’
Dy. No…….62……….
Date……21/4…..
now case is for final arguments on the above ground can i won the case or not?
monika
27 August 2009 at 08:17
can any one guide me that in which particular paper the posts for judges are bieng advertised any particular site pls help
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Installation of Mobile Towers
I WOULD LIKE TO INSTALL A MOBILE ROOF TOP TOWER AT THE ROOF OF MY BUILDING AND AS MY NEIGHBOURS COULDN'T INSTALL ON THEIR BUILDING THEY HAVE STARTED FILING VAROIUS WRIT PETITION AGAINST THE MUNICIPALITY FOR NOT GRANTING PERMISSION ON THE GROUND OF HEALTH HAZARDS. I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW ABOUT THE RECENT JUDGEMENTS WHICH WOULD HELP ME IN THE MATTER.