FIR 37/2004 dt. 18.2.2004 u/s 385/384/354
Avinash kumar seth
(Querist) 27 August 2009
This query is : Resolved
Smt. Asha Arya registered a case FIR 37/2004 dated 18.2.2004 she was on leave from 11th Feb 2003 to 19 April 2003 after joining her duty she wrote two letter both letters were verified in Defense witnesses because in her cross she denied her signature on the letter and said she was not admitted that she wrote two letter to her office on 20.4.2005 those letters are as follows
other information sought under RTI act 2005 i.e. her paper cancelled in the month of N ov. 2002 not in December 2002 her paper started SO grade exam on 27th May 2003 not in the month of 27th June 2003 her result declared on 11.12.2003 not in September 2003. in defence witness her office authority verify this information as per their office record.
Two cheques given to PW6 Mr. V.S. Chauhan one was Rs. 2000/- and another was Rs.5000/- one cheuqe she gave to accused wife Rs. 1100/- but in complaint she told that accused give the cheque and her wife cash the cheque in her account.
PW6 V S Chauhan complaint her in Ps IP Estate against Asha Arya (Complainant) he is on duty and she is on leave on that day on 9.3.2004 PS IP Estate police personal verified that complaint is pending with the PS.
case is State v/s Avinash Kumar Seth (self)
Asha Arya wife of Sh. Satish Chandra, resident of 147-Neb Sarai, New Delhi working as Sr. Auditor in the office of the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi, AGCR Bldg., New Delhi-110002, without any influence and pressure from any body disclose that the contents of FIR No. 37/2004 registered on 18.2.2004 at Mandir Marg Police Station, New Delhi are false and fabricated and the above FIR was lodged by me under extreme pressure and threat to me by my husband. I had no intention to label mean and false allegations on anybody but the pressure and threat of my husband led to all this. As regards misbehaviour with Sh. V.S. Chauhan, P.A. by my husband in the office complex during lunch time on 9.3.2004, I am to state that my husband pressurised me to impose on Sh. V.S. Chauhan false allegations of illegal affairs with me. I did all these things the way my husband wanted me to do. I again reiterate that there is no truth in any of the allegation and these are all fabricated.
Sd/-
20/4/2005
Dated: 20.4.2005 (Asha Arya)
To
Shri V.S. Chauhan
PA to Sr. DAG (Admn.)
true copy attested
Sd/-
Mr. Chaman Bhandari, Sr. AO
o/o AG (Audit) Delhi
AGCR Building, IP Estate
NEW DELH
To
The Sr. Dy. Acctt. General (Admn.),
O/o the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi,
AGCR Bldg.,
NewDelhi-110002
I, Asha Arya wife of Sh. Satish Chandra, resident of 147-Neb Sarai, New Delhi working as Sr. Auditor in the office of the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi, AGCR Bldg., New Delhi without any influence and pressure from an body disclose that the contents of FIR No. 37/2004 registered on 18.2.2004 at Mandir Marg Police Station, New Delhi are false, baseless and fabricated and the above FIR was lodged by me under extreme pressure and threat to me by my husband. I had no intention to label mean and false allegations on anybody but the pressure and threat of my husband led to all this. As regards misbehaviour with Sh. V.S. Chauhan, P.A. by my husband in the office complex during lunch time on 9.3.2004, I am to state that my husband pressurised me to impose on Sh. V.S. Chauhan false allegations of illegal affairs with me. I did all these things the way my husband wanted me to do. I again reiterate that there is no truth in any of the allegation and these are all fabricated. I apologize to the office and Sh. V.S. Chauhan for my wrong doings and I assure you Sir that such type of things will not occur in future.
Sd/-
Dated: 20.04.2005 (ASHA ARYA)
Witness
1 J.B. Gupta
AO (Estt.) Sd/- 20/4/05
2 Jawahar Lal
A.O. (Admn.)
O/o (Audit) Delhi Sd/- 20/4/05
“Sr. DAG (Admn & A/CS)’’
Dy. No…….62……….
Date……21/4…..
now case is for final arguments on the above ground can i won the case or not?
Somnath mukherjee
(Expert) 02 September 2009
The winning of tjhe case is depend upon the merit
