Anonymous
25 October 2009 at 21:45
Hi
This is with reference to unsafe environment in the society premises causing damage to car parked in the premises.
Children (college going guys) play football mercelessly in the society premises, which is a non-play area. When these guys were confronted their parents were furious and barged into our flat shouting reflecting as if we have committed a crime and supported their kids to continue playing. Such play had caused damage to some cars, including my car in the past, but it was ignored thinking that situation will improve, however, this has become a regular phenomenon with no hesitance on part of the childrens and their parents.
The situation was informed to the managing committee, and as a consequence my car was damaged by pouring red paint on the bonnet. On taking up this matter with the managing committee, they were indifferent and did not do anything to help us by investigating the matter or banning football play in the premises.
After some months the same car, which is parked in the cascade (machine) parking taken on rent from Society fell from the height of 1st floor due to collapse of the parking slot. The committee again acted indifferently and did not bother to contact us about this incident. On the contrary, they sent the servicemen to our flat asking us to remove the car from the parking so that the parking can be repaired. We informed them that the car has broken down completely and instead to apologising to us for the collapse of the machinery due to improper maintenance and taking responsibility of the damage, they were shamelessly pressurising us to remove the car, so that the machine can be repaired and then car could be parked again.
We did claim the damages from the society, but the managing committee has put up the matter for resolution in the upcoming AGM, which is 1.5 months after the incident. Further, they have spread the word among other members who cars are parked in the same machine, that we are holding up the repair of the machine thus causing inconvenience to all members. As a result, other members called us to remove our car. Since we never wanted to cause any inconvenience to other members, we acted responsibily and removed our car for repair.
We are really shocked by the attitude of the managing committee who dont seem to be really taking responsibility of the loss and thus taking us for granted. Seriously speaking I donot any decision in our favour in the AGM.
As a result, I write to you to get justice and teach these crooks a lesson
Please help.
Thanks
Rekha.....
25 October 2009 at 17:01
Dear Respected Sirs/Ma'am
Would u please provide us with following Citations as V hv to submit urgently at the Hon'ble court of Silvassa. Please appreciate this urgently.......thnks
Mahavir Singh V managing director, Mutual Leasing and finance Ltd. 2002(1) CPJ 103: 2002(2) CPR 319: 2002(3) CLT 162(Delhi)
Ashok Leyland Finance Ltd V Himanshu s. Thumar, 2005(2) CPJ 92: 2005(2) CLT 254( Guj)
Khaleel Ahmed Mohammed
25 October 2009 at 16:28
A and B are husband and wife. Out of their wed lock PQR three male children born. As a matter of fact B had illegal relationship with her brother in law X . Actual father of the Q is X. A died leaving some properties.
My question is whether Q have legal right to succeed the properties left A as per Hindu Succession.
vinod bansal
24 October 2009 at 21:42
R/Members
Kindly tell me full form of P.A.P.M. Act.Thanx n Regards
vineet advocate
24 October 2009 at 20:32
whether a civil court has jurisdiction in electricity matters? if yes what is the AUTHORITY against B L KANTROO'S JUDGEMENT?
Selvam Perumal
24 October 2009 at 20:04
Dear Sir,
I am expecting your kind clarification on the following issues:
1. In a Contract for Employment the Staff wantonly committed a breach of Contract and failed to come for duty as such the employer had issued a notice under Section 75 of the Indian Contract Act for rescinding the contract and now he is intending to file a suit for damages as against the Staff for the loss caused by the staff.
2. But in the said Contract there is no Clause stipulating for damages in the event of breach of Contract, so under these circumstances whether a suit for damages will lie?
3. Since no penalty clause is stipulated in the Contract as such is there any yardstick available for ascertaining the “quantum of damages”?
4. Furthermore the Contract was not written in the Stamped Papers but it was written in the Plain white papers and signed by the Staff. Whether such a Contract is maintainable under law and whether it can be impounded during the trial stage?
Kindly advise me in this regard.
yogesh
24 October 2009 at 20:04
Please inform what is the meaning of final synposis.Is it the part of rejoinder? or for concluding submissions of any trail???
Mohamed Ali
24 October 2009 at 11:15
We have a Muslim partition suite pending in Final decree proceedings and is adjourned for 31st of this month, for which preleminary dated almost 1970..
We are LR's of one plaintiff, plaintiff had 3 children two daughters and one son who had predeceased her, but his childrens were wrongly brought on record while filing final decree petition in the year 1989,
plaintiff daughter has filed an Interlocutary application in 2008 to strike out these LR's of predeceased sons children from record as they are not entitle fo share as per Mohameddan law.
Also, In this Final decree proceddings there are 3 non-bonafide subsequent purcahser who has some how been made as parties as additional defendants,
And one of the purchaser has done out of court compromise with some of decree holders except one plaintiff for one of the decree schedule property against the will of lR's of one plaintiff who has objected saying that First the Interlocutary application to strike out LR's of plaintiff who are not entitle for share must be disposed off as there is problem amongs LR"s of one plaintiff must be settled,then any compromise will be entertained by the objecting LR's of plaintiff.
The Honorable court agreed to dispose of our IA to strike out LR's of plaintiff who are not entitle for share and posted our I.A for Orders two hearing back, Now after 2 hearings suddenly Judge is taking a
U-turn and not writing Order on our I.A , further saying he will refer the case to Lokadalat if the parties agreed and try for compromise with subsequent non-bonafide purchasers with out disposing our IA, As per the Judge, as of now tour IA will be kept as it is.., As one of the non-bonafide purchaser is an influential person may be Judge under some influence acting this way,
We are very frustrated, our simple I.A is pending from past 2 years we being Plaintiff , our I.A is not entertained and dispose off, the Judge is more interested in compromising the non-bonafide subsequent purchaser who has no equity as per decree.
We are fed up with this trial court judges atittudes, Can we approach high court as our IA is pending from almost 2 years.
Dhanesh
24 October 2009 at 10:48
Dear Experts
I am being cheated by two companies. one is my own bank and other is that company with which i have my demat account.
I issue a cheque to India Infoline Ltd. (IIL) of Rs.5000/- to give credit to my Demat account on 09/07/2009 from my saving account in Axis Bank. The said cheque was passed from my SB account on 11/07/2009 and the amount was debited. But IIL people are saying that they not received the credit.
Now what should i do?
Dhanesh
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Probate.
Hi friends,
As per section 57 and 213 of Indian Succession Act, the areas which are comming under the jurisdiction of Bombay Hicourt and Madras high court in British India, a WILL need not to be Probated or probate is not required for immovable property. But my query is if the deceased left some amount in the bank as fixed deposit- in the circumstances whether a will is to Probated or it is exumpted ?