Raja Sundarraman
11 August 2008 at 18:25
Respected Learned Friends, I invite your valuable opinions as to a foriegner purchase purchase land in India. Is the Right to propert enshrined in our Constitution made avilable to a citizens of a foriegn country who was formerly a citizen of India?
rajesh chanda sharma
10 August 2008 at 19:52
I have applied for an information from DIOS siddharthnagar ,comprising copy of an order/note sheet ,he is denying to provide the same in writing, on the ground that,it is a confidential document
is he right?
Sanjeev Mohan
10 August 2008 at 06:27
Sir,
here the question involved is the admissibility of a digital photograph. whether the C.D produced along with the Photo be treated as Primary evidence? Please refer sitations (AIR,SCC)
Srinivas.B.S.S.T
09 August 2008 at 23:50
In an appeal where there are 26 appellants and sole respondent. The sole respondent died. One of the appellants filed petitions under or22 rl4, or22 rl9 and section5 of limitation act to condone the delay. In all the affidavits accompanying with respective petitions, she sworn the affidavits but it was no where mentioned that she is also swearing the affidavit on behalf of the rest of the petitioners/appellants. Can we say that as she has not sworn the affidavit on behalf of rest of the petitioners/appellants the same is not maintainable? Can I have any citation if possible.
Gururja Rao
09 August 2008 at 20:20
Hi all,
I need a legally valid draft House rent agreement tremination notice u/sec 106 of T.P. Act, Can any body provide it. The tenent premises is at Hyderabad, A.P, and the monthly Rent payable by him is Rs 4000/- Per month. The premises under occupation of tenent need to land lord for his personal requirement, further land lord is also resident of Hyderabad,A.P.
Please help me it is Urgent.
Thank you both sir, The Tenancy was oral. at the time of inception of tenancy the teneant paid Rs2,800/-PM,which is excluding electricity and water charges, every year the tenacy was extended orally.please advise me in the said circumstances can i issue him notice terminating his tenancy u/sec 106 of T.P.Act,if you think I can kindly provide me a draft notice, awaiting eagerly.
parikshit rajvaidya
09 August 2008 at 10:55
Dear sir
We a private limited company have purchased a property having plant in the state of UP through registered sale deed. The property includes Land and machinery.
That means the land is being used for industrial purpose.
Thereafter our company has been merged under scheme of amalgamation and merger with another company and Hon'ble HC approved the said scheme.
Now the matter is thate in the state of
UP how such land can be mutated in the name of company in which our comapny got merged.
Actually we have got impression that under UPLR Act no industrial land can be mutated.
Kindly how the property can be mutated.Pls give your valuable suggestions.
Shekhar
08 August 2008 at 23:56
In 2006 my father in law has takan away the car in hand writing A4 size paper! there in my important file were there due to which i have suffered my Job.... The matter regarding the marraige Null and Void or divorce is going on court... pls. some one guide me to take my things and good back from there, must be some saction through which i can get my things! only her father has confessed the things with one person that his (Mine) things were there...
harish
08 August 2008 at 14:36
sir/madam
i am not getting the supreme court judgements on preponderance of probability in civil cases for reference. pls help me regarding any citation referring the above phrase
KANDE VENKATESH GUPTA
07 August 2008 at 22:49
Dear members, Whether a fish in the pond is immovable property or movable property, please clarify
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Direction to defendant
In a suit for grant of perpetual injunction against the defendant restraining from interfering with the possession, while dismissing the temporary injunction, having come to the conclusion that the petitioner/plaintiff failed to prove his possession and the respondent/defendant had established his possession and had been making construction in the SSP by obtaining valid permission from the competent authority, Whether the court can direct the respondent/defendant to give an undertaking to demolish the structures raised by him, if at ultimate trial the plaintiff proves his case?