Rajiv Peris
24 March 2008 at 21:19
90 % of the exhibits in the affadavit of evidence are rejected as the respondent requested the Ld Judge to reject the same as per the CPC procedure code. However these documents were mentioned in the plaint and are essential in proving the case for the Plaintiff. The Ld.Judge passed the above order rejecting the documents. Revision application has been filed to request the court to put the Plaintiff in the box and cross examine to allow the applicant to prove his documents.
I am looking for Supreme Court or Bombay High Court case laws/ Citations to support our case.
sarves
24 March 2008 at 19:13
Dear Sir,
my sister take an admission in a medical colleage and paid a fees of Rs.50000/- but she could not take admission due to next day she got a call from another colleage.
now they are not returning the money saying that there are no provision to refund the fees.
now i want to no the followings.
1. what remedy available to us.
2. what is the limitation period.
3. please send a draft application for file a complain in consumer court.
regards
srk
Gururja Rao
24 March 2008 at 18:44
Hi all,
I am the plaintiff in the bare Injunction suit filed by me against my brother restraining him from constructing house in common area, subsequent to filing of the suit, before summons could be served on my brother he settled the matter while assuring me that he will not construct any structure in common area, and beliving him I have not deposited process in the main suit though I got Interim Injunction, thereafter the suit filed by me was dismissed for default for non depositing of process on defendant in the main suit. After two years in my absence my brother started construction in common area and compleated construction. Immediately I have filed an application U/o 9 r-4 of C.P.C for restoration of suit and the same was allowed and on behalf of my brother an advocate filed vakalat and sought time for filing Written statement, Now my doubt is that however my brother compleated construction in common area, and by continuing bare Injunction suit no purpose is going to be served on me, in such circumstances shall I file Amendment petition u/O 6 R-17 of C.P.c for Mandatory relief, if yes is it maintainable in Bare Injunction suits. And further I need a proforma amendment petition praying Mandatory relief with relevant case laws if any. Kindly provide me as it is very urgent. expecting answer with proforma amendment petition.
davinder
24 March 2008 at 18:28
AN AGREEMENT OF SALE HAS BEEN ALLEGED BY MY CLIENT ON 14/06/1999 THAT THE AGREEMENT WILL BE EXECUTED ON 14/11/1999. NOW ON 26/06/2007 HE SUED MY CLIENT ON THE BASIS OF THE LETTERS WRITTEN TO MY CLIENT. THE SECOND THING THAT MY CLIENT CAME INTO THE STEP SHOES OF HIS FATHER AFTER 2004 OF THAT PROPERTY THE HON'BLE MAGISTRATE HAS PASS THE INJUNCTION ORDER U/39-1,2 AGAINST MY CLIENT ON THE BASIS OF THAT VAUGE A LETTERS AND HE ORDERED THAT ORAL AGREEMENT SUFFICENT I NEED LAW ON THIS POINT AND AUTHORITY AGAINST THAT JUDGEMENT
rameshkumar
21 March 2008 at 19:46
whether possession notice and sale notice can be published in a same day and is there any time limit is prescribed bet ween both in the concerned act?
Gururja Rao
21 March 2008 at 14:25
Hi, all
While disposing of petition for mutation of the respective shares in the property viz agricultural lands, whether the MRO(Thasildar) has got powers to decide the title and extent of shares by altering, modyfying or allottting certain extent of land of one co-owner to other? what is the provision of law which empowers the MRO while deciding the mutation proceedings in Andhrapradesh. Please help me, it is very urgent.
A K SARAVANAN
20 March 2008 at 17:11
A Dispute between land owner and super structure owner from long years, finally the commissioner of Land Adminsitration was passed a order in favour of us on 1992.
Land vested to government and super structure owner can move to patta.
The Land owner Writ petition filed to Madras High court on 1997 (after five years), case is pending till date. (01.11.2008) In the connections ,We are moving patta during the period from 1992.
Now we are trying patta under TN Free townside vested land patta Scheme.
Our doubt:
1. Writ petition is pending in the case
2. If we are getting patta from government under TN Free vested land scheme, the patta is valuable or not.
3. Writ petition filed after 5 years, the case is stand or not (I think time barred)
rajesh saluja
20 March 2008 at 10:05
i have not purchased open parking from builder on the grounnd that builder cannot sell open parking the managing committee took contrary view and passed resolution that they will charge rs1000/p.m for car park &chargers100 from those who bought from builder in our soc quite no of members have bought more then 2 open parking buy paying rs 10000/ by cheque rs 65000/ in cash to builder. i have pd rs10000/ to soc. the sec is refusing my soc maintenance cheque since iam not paying rs1000/ charge with the result i am attracting componding inton outstanding.I want to know whether my stand is correct are there any high judgement in these regard
Priya
20 March 2008 at 06:49
What are the informations required by the hospital or dr who performs abortion for a single woman? Are these data private? Who has legal rights to take this data from the hospital? What if the abortion was conducted with the consent of the man invloved. Does he have any rights to legally take the information from the hospital as proof of abortion?
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Personal Loan
My client has borrowed a huge sum of money from many persons by issuing receipts on plain paper. Now he is not able to pay either the interest or the principal to any of the creditors. Is he legally safe in not returning the money to his various creditors in case any or all of them sue a case against him?