Rahul
12 December 2009 at 17:54
Plaintiff make me respondent with some other persons & a summon served on me and I appeared before the court but plaintiff is not filing summon for service on other respondents and i m in hurry for disposal of the case. Now what can i do.
Rahul
sanjeev
12 December 2009 at 14:17
Dear All,
I want to know that Can a person use photocopy of any paper on behalf of them suit has been done after assessment order (Case resolved) by an civil court again for suit.
If yes what is the procedure.
Sanjeev
Surender Oberoi
12 December 2009 at 13:42
Dear Hon'ble Members,
Can any Hon'ble member of legal fraternity enlighten the applicability and/or restriction of the judgment delivered by the Apex Court in TMA Pai Foundation Vs State of Karnatka AIR 2003 SC and Islamic Academy of Education & Anr Vs State of Karnataka AIR 2003 (6) SCC vis-a-vis Coaching Centres
and /or a consumer - a student with any coaching centre ?
Sunny Honey
12 December 2009 at 13:29
A PIO DISPENSES THE INFORMATION CONCERNING A PERSON,(HAVING RELATION TO A MATTER IN RESPECT OF WHICH A DEPARTMENTAL ENQUIRY STANDS PENDING) TO A INFORMATION SEEKER UNDER RTI ACT, 2005.
SINCE THE RULING AVAILABLE IN THE CASE OF SARVESH KAUSHAL vs F.C.I. AND OTHERS 243/ICPB/2006 AND 244/ICPB/2006 CLEARLY HIGHLIGHTS THE FACTS DULY GIVEN CONSIDERATION BY THE AUTHORITY BEFORE WHOM SUCH ISSUE WAS PENDING THAT --- NO DISCLOSURE IN CASE OF PENDING DEPARTMENTAL ENQUIRY (AS IT WAS COVERED BY SECTION 8(1)(J) OF THE RTI ACT, 2005.
NOW SINCE THE PIO HAS DISPENSED THE INFORMATION RELATING TO A MATTER IN RESPECT OF WHICH ENQUIRY WAS PENDING, CAN THE PERSON WHOSE INFORMATION IS SO GIVEN BRING OUT AN ACTION FOR DAMAGES IN FORM OF DEFAMATION AGAINST THE PIO FOR GRAVELY VIOLATING THE PROVISIONS OF THE RTI ACT / OR GROSSLY VIOLATING THE DUE CONSIDERATIONS ARRIVED AT BY THE AUTHORITY DECIDING SUCH ISSUE IN THE AFORESAID RULING.
AN URGENT REPLY IN THE MATTER REQUIRED.
Sunny Honey
12 December 2009 at 13:15
As per the provisions of Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, 2005, PIOs are restricted from dispensing with any private information relating to a person/individual. NOW WHAT IF, THE PIO DISPENSES WITH SUCH PRIVATE INFORMATION CONCERNING A PERSON TO THE THIRD PARTY I.E.(INFORMATION SEEKER) IN AN RTI APPLICATION,
1) CAN THE PERSON WHOSE INFORMATION IS SO SENT BRING OUT AN ACTION FOR DAMAGES AGAINST SUCH PIO BY FILING A CRIMINAL CASE OF DEFAMATION AS GOVERNED BY PROVISIONS OF SECTION 500 I.P.C OF 1860 ?
2)IF NOT, WHAT RECOURSE THE PERSON (WHOSE INFORMATION IS SO GIVEN HAS, TO TEACH THE PIO A LESSON(AS THE PIO HAS RELEASED AN EXEMPTED DISCLOSURE GOVERNED BY SECTION 8(1)(J) OF THE RTI ACT, 2005.
AN URGENT REPLY IN THE MATTER WILL BE HIGHLY APPRECIATED.
MAIL ME EARLY...THANKX
Anonymous
12 December 2009 at 12:28
sir,
my father-in-law expired last year. his heirs are two sons and a daughter(who is divorced and living with us). my father in law owned a garment shop in which my husband was doing business with him since 20 yrs. my brother in law had got seperated(not legally) and was running another shop which is in my husband's name.my father in law did not make a will
after his death my husband took a new trade licence and vat registration on his name and started running the business
now, my brother in law is suddenly coming in the shop and demanding that he too has rights to sit and do business from this shop as it is running much well comparitively. the elders of the family tried to make him understand, also we tried with some monetary settlement but of no avail. we filed for an injunction order in the court, of which the proceedings are still going on. my question is that will the injunction order be granted,how long can the proceedings go.and due to which points can it be cancelled or revoked.
thank you. pls reply at earliest.
Anonymous
12 December 2009 at 11:00
Dear sir,
We was appointed as sale promoter of a company in 1997 and at that time we had deposited Rs.6,00,000=00 as security deposit. Due to conflict the company had closed the business and files two cases against us under NI Act 138 without finalized any of accounts.
In the year 2003 they gave us a notice to confirm the deposits as on 31st march 1998 for income tax purpose.On the basis of that latter we filled a case for recovery of security deposits in court of law.
Now the company is saying that:
A. It is time bar case( Out of civil limitation)
B. They had forfeited the amount in sept. 1998.
Now the facts are as under:
A. There is no any communication about security amount from both the end till the date of first notice given by us in the year 2003.
B. In the reply of notice for refund they had not mentioned about the forfeiture
C.They had not produced any book of account about the security deposits( As they were maintains two books for their transaction one for business related and another for security deposits.
Can you help me in the matter by citing any of cases in this regards from any of higher court of India.
With Regards
Vijay Bhutda
00919341053313
Jibanananda Goswami
11 December 2009 at 22:56
An authority is not paying its staffs from last six months. Can the staffs ask the reason and when the due will be paid? Can the matter be related with life & liberty of the staffs?
DEVENDRA
11 December 2009 at 22:30
In one matter, public trust is made defendent. As trust is not legal entity, it is necessary to add all trustees in the suit. Whether one can amend the suit and add all trustees as defendents ? whether limitation act will be applicable for amendment ? the suit was filed 3 years back. The suit is still not at hearing stage.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Noitce to Municipality
is it necessary to mention the provision of law in the notice to Municiplity, if not mentioned what is the consequences?
any citations?