madhurMehta
20 June 2008 at 16:26
plz.give me the judgments of comercial/livelyhood perpose in electricity board cases.
thaks in advance
Alluri Sivaji Raju
20 June 2008 at 06:58
Hi friends! in a pending creditor Insolvancy petition the Respondent / Debtor sold his another property which was not shown in the schedule of the pending petition, without taking any consideration only with a view to defrauding the creditors. The said sale transaction is within the limitation to set a side the sale transaction i.e.90 days. The petitioner / Creditor neither filed another creditor I.P. nor filed a petitioner for add the recently sold property schedule by amending the pending petition. Please advice. What type of remedy the Petitioner / Creditor have for set aside the sale deed which was executed recentsly by the Respondent/Debtor.
Rama Verma
19 June 2008 at 17:48
there is future agreement between a & b FOR 1997 TO 2001 in which A PAYS IN ADVANCE FOR OIL TO BE PROVIDED UPTO 2001.BUT B FAILS TO PROVIDE OR STOP TO PROVIDE.WHAT ARE LIABLITIES AGAINST B.
Ladhu Ram Chowdhary
19 June 2008 at 06:39
Commencement of -Cover note issued on 2.4.1988 at 4.30 p.m.-Accident occurred on 3.4.1988-in covernote specific period of policy from 4.4.1988 to 3.4.1989 mentioned- whether insurance company may be hold lible for compensation ?
Ladhu Ram Chowdhary
19 June 2008 at 06:29
loss of business income because of remaining the vehicle in idle positon-whether claim tribunal has jurisdiction to enterain the claim for such loss?
BRAJENDRA SINGH
18 June 2008 at 20:40
It has been observed that nowdays, many Banking and Insurance Companies make calls on anybody's mobile number and press them to secure clientage. It becomes very disturbing when an individual is busy in his work or taking rest.
Is there any law or Hon'ble Court order banning unwanted calls disturbing any body's privacy. Please send me the copy of order or judgement in this reference.
Brajendra Singh
singhbbd@gmail.com
azeez
18 June 2008 at 20:40
Appelleant died, LRs was not implead with in limitation, after then we want to implead the LRs and how to implead the Legal heirs send expert opinion therafter?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Query under Maharashtra Rent Control Act
A limited company (A) whose is my tenant, and whose paid up share capital is less than Rs. 1.00 crores has been taken over by another limited company (B) whose paid up share capital is more than Rs. 1.00 crores, and is now under its (B) management and termed its 'associate' company. B is also referred to as the Holding Company of A in the balance sheet of A. Can A, my tenant be evicted under the above referred act since it is now held under the management of B whose paid up capital is more than Rs. 1.00 crores? What are the legal implications of the terms 'under the same management', 'associate' and 'holding company'?