yugdeep narwat
24 October 2010 at 02:25
what does d court scrutinize where 'procedure established by law' is implemented???
or is there no scope of judicial scrutiny in case of procedure established by law ???
Anonymous
24 October 2010 at 00:47
Dear Counsels,
The final order on a writ appeal is to challenged before the supreme court. Is it mandatory to get the permission of the high court for leave to file a SLP before the supreme court.
Will there be any issue if the permission of the high court was not sought for appelaing against his final order on the writ appeal. Please clarify.
Adv Surendra Dalvi Patil
23 October 2010 at 11:59
under which article our fundamental rights will be revocked.
yugdeep narwat
22 October 2010 at 21:50
what is d meaning of 'due process of law' and 'procedure established by law'???
and what is d difference between them ???
Devnandan Sharma
22 October 2010 at 19:16
I have received three charges and directed to proceed for recording of evidences. The charges are as foolows:
1. That the Charman, Dr, Ram Singhasan Singh and Members, Dr. Shiv Balak Chaudhary and Dr. Deonandan Sharma of the said Commission misused their office and indulged in corrupt practices while making recommendations for selection of candidates in the first Limited Competitive Examination as detailed in the Vigilance Report No. 19/2005.
2. That the Chairman, Dr. Ram Singhasan Singh and Members, Dr. Shiv Balak Chaudhary and Dr. Deonandan Sharma of the said Commission had abused their official position and indulge in corrupt practice while making recommendations for appointment of Shri Arun Kumar Sinha as Stadium Manager of Moinul Haque Stadium, Patna, as detailed in vigilance Report No. 10/2006.
3. That the Chairman, Dr. Ram Singhasan Singh and Members, Dr. Shiv Balak Chaudhary and Dr. Deonandan Sharma of the said Commission have also committed a number of irregularities in sending recommendations for appointment of office of the Bihar Veterinary Services (Class-II) as detailed in F.I.R. in vigilance P.S. No. 20/2006, all of which are serious acts of misconduct, if established.
My query is:
Whether the three charges are charges as defined law;
Whether the details are not necessary to be attached with the said statements;
Whether the I have to undergo the inquiry without knowing the details of the charges;
Whether recording of evidences would be proper without the details of the charges having been specified.
Anonymous
22 October 2010 at 13:03
I want to know that can we have a right to file a case against the "band" called by the various parties time to time for various issues.
Due to which poor people can not earn money for the livelyhood and the losses waht they suffer.
ami
22 October 2010 at 09:23
Hi,Good day
NOW OUR GOVT UNDER PRESSURE PLAN TO INSIST PG QUALIFICATION TO MIDDLE SCHOOL HEADMASTERS WHICH CADRE IS PROPOSED TO BE FUSED WITH LECTURERS WHOSE QUALIFICATION(PG DEGREE) IS TO BE PUT INTO THE RR TO BE AMENDED FOR WHICH THE PRINCIPLE OF AUDIALTRAM HAS BEEN FOLLOWED .BUT OUT OF 172 HEADMASTERS GrII 120 DONOT HAVE PG. WHAT TO DO?
BUT IN 2009 WHILE IMPLEMENTING 6TH PAY, THE LT.GOVERNOR PLEASED TO RELAX THE EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION I/R OF ALL EXISTING TEACHERS IN THEIR EXISTING PAY SCALES FROM THE QUALIFICATIONS FOR GRANTING THE REVISED PAY BAND/GRADE PAY ONLY. WILL THIS RELAXATION BE CLAIMED NOW TO PUT A SAVING CLAUSE IN THE PROPOSED RR SO THAT THE HMGrII MAY GET PROMOTION AS HMGrI? PLEASE HELP US.Regards
Suchitra. S
21 October 2010 at 15:18
Respected experts, I will be greatful if you can please help me in getting case laws regarding S.10(3)(h) of the Indian Passport Act?
Anonymous
20 October 2010 at 19:01
Dear Sir,
I Have taken admission in regular M.Tech ( CS ) in GCET Greater Noida on 4-12-2007 in academic year 2007-08. The event happened as follows
1.
First examination schedule of first semester declared from 13-08-08, but canceled by university due to not completion of admit card process.DELAY = 8 MONTHS
2.
Second examination schedule of first semester declared from 26-08-08, and examination conducted properly.
DELAY = 8 MONTHS
3.
Declaration of result just one day before first exam of first semester for batch 2008-09 in January 2009.
4.
18 May 2009 had meeting regarding second semester examination's, and took schedule for the same from UPTU Lucknow for commencing 7 June 2009.
5. 10-06-09 Starting examination of 2nd semesater .
DELAY = 12 MONTHS
6.
Declaration of Second semester result on 10 February 2010.
7.
Putting scrutiny of all subjects on 12 and, 27 February 2010 for 2 Subjects each day as total i have 4 subjects.
8.
Till date of 13 October 2010 university has not declared result of scrutiny.
I have consumed 34 months and from the date of admission 4th academic year in this course. Its duration is 24 months. I did not denied anywhere for any university or college activity. This all delay due to university irresponsible working and ignoring the student career. This is all when we have given many emails to university authorities but no reply and continuing same irresponsible working. My whole career and life is in great risk. I as not able to do regular jobs and still delay from university has put me in tremendous risk and tension.
I have only option of sucide or court.
I need suggestion from you what legal action i can take to save myself.I have attached uptu ordinance of M.Tech.
I want suggestion for that..
1. If I want to put compensation for my wasted years, career and tensions then how much i can put as amount as till now approximately 16 months has been wasted and dont have any hope to end the degree in next 6 month ?
2. Am I needed to present in every hearing on each date ?
3.How much amount and time is needed to complete the case till judgement ??
4. How should i approach and choose an advocate ?
5.If anybody can provide me some reference for UP High Court then kindly let me know ?
Regards.
AR
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Are SOPs of some hotels illegal?
Requesting only very precise and legal answers. Some hotels have SOPs(Standard Operating Procedure)to not allow licensed arms holders go inside. In my opinion the firearm license has been issued as per the law of the land, for self defense which is a fundamental right(legally means license has been issued for enforcement of law of the land as per sections 96 to 106 IPC if the need arises). Probably they have the right to decide whom to allow in, but without violating the rights of individual. That is, they cannot say that we allow you in only after your rights are violated or abridged. Can they infringe/abridge the fundamental and legal rights of the person before allowing in?