Sukhraj
17 June 2015 at 16:56
Dear expert
My father has3 brothers and one sister. My father is the eldest and lives separately from my grandfather. Recently my grandfather expired and the registered will was opened. In the will it is written that it is his third will. the reference of the first will and the date on which it was registered has been mentioned . but the reference of the second will has not been mentioned. It is also mentioned that the first will so and so is annulled in light of the third will but no refence is given to the second will. As my father and one of his brother who also lived separately has not inherited a penny from his will. They believe that the third will is not authentic and the beneficiary of the third will are deliberately hiding the second will and its reference from them.
My questions are
Can we get the copy of the second will from the court without any reference number and date
Can we challenge the third will on the basis that the reference to the second will and date on which it was registered is not mentioned in the third will, although it is clearly stated that it is the third will.
K K S V SOMESWAR
15 June 2015 at 19:38
In any execution of an injunction decree, can the third party be added without adding the person against whom the decree has been passed ?
TANGO KILO
11 June 2015 at 22:12
Dear sir/mam a soldier is given 4 months RI with dissmiss from service on being deserter for 18 months and missing i card.
His grounds for offence were severely ailing parents with noone to look after and encroachment in his property.
Is there any possibility to reduce his punishment to start his life again and to cater his family ?
If possible how.
gopal
08 June 2015 at 15:48
Respected Sir,
I am from a Town which is near to Chennai. In our town one famous temple is there , after renovation work on the temple, the Consecration ceremony held on yesterday.
the day before yesterday it self i and all other devotees were went to the temple as usual.
the Consecration ceremony planed on 7-6-2015 at 5.15 to 6.15 am
the temple authorities were kept so many banners of advertisement, which show that the Consecration ceremony held on 7-6-2015 at 5.15 to 6.15 AM ,all the devotees are welcome.
Before temple Consecration ceremony, it has some events which starts from early morning 2.00 am , this will also know by the temple authorities and devotees like us.
So I and some of the daily visiting devotees were went on 7-6-2015 at 2.15 am to participate from the beginning event ,when we enter the gate the police men asked the Badge of the temple.
I and other daily devotees were refused to go inside the police men told that the temple authorities were directed no one will be allowed with out temple badge till 8.30 am.
I and the daily devotees were surprised and we are not allowed to enter into the temple
which means the temple authorities were given temple badges only for VIP for entry to the temple, not for the public.
As per the temple authorities direction the police men were not to allowed the public into temple till 8.30 am .
even after finishing Consecration ceremony the public like us were allowed to the temple.
The temple authorities did not informed this to the public so the public like us came to the temple from 3.00 am onwards but the ordinary devotees like public were not event allowed to enter in to the temple till the Consecration is over.
This is not fair that the temple authorities were planned to celebrate the Consecration ceremony with only VIPs and avoiding the public till the Consecration ceremony is over till 8.30.
The right of ordinary devotees like public,
were restrained with out giving any prior notice.
Now I request to get your advice
1)This type of temple authorities behaviour is good or not.
2)Whether the law supports this type of anti public activity.
3)This type of situation will not come here after in any temple ,so what type of action is recommended by you.
Note : The temple has so many VIP Contacts so they think that they can refuse the public no one question them.
Kindly provide the information which will help the public
biswajit nag
02 June 2015 at 10:55
WHAT ARE WRITES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN INDIA?
neeru
26 May 2015 at 05:38
Respected Sirs,
I had earlier posted a query. Only comment i got was that it was "too long a query"
In short I am furnishing a link to the judgement passed while dismissing my writ. The major issues are as under:
http://lobis.nic.in/dhc/VJM/judgement/12-05-2015/VJM07052015CW52082008.pdf
Para 6 of the judgement
The charge sheet was modified at the instance of Inquiry officer appointed by CVC. Since there was no charge of corruption, CVC did not have jurisdiction to inquire into. However, by inducting the word misconduct at the instance of IO. My point is that IO had no authority to direct the bank for modifing the Charge sheet. Secondly, he mentioned in his order that a seperate letter was being written was behind my back. That letter was never shown to me.
Para 10 onward
Bank sought CVC advice. It is wrong to say that I have argued that there is no provision in CVC (perhaps it is SIDBI, my organisation) regulation to seek advice. There is provision that in case of charges of corruption, Bank will consult CVC. However there was no charge of corruption therefore bank was wrong in consulting CVC.
Besides, several other major and important issues are not discussed in the judgement.
These are as under:
I was only advised through a letter about the punishment and it was implemented. No order of the DA was given.
Neither first stage nor second stage advice of CVC was shared with me Bank has categorily said in its reply that i had no right to get the copy of cvc advice. Further, it has stated that 'although the Bank has pleaded for leniency in the matter', which imply that they were compelled to impose the punishment on me.
Since i had appeared in person and presented my case i had submitted written arguments with so many case laws, particularly, D C Sharma v/s state bank of india and nagraj karjagi V/s syndicate bank.Besides, the cvc guidelines on providing first and second stage advice.
There so many other issues which i will not mention here. the major issues have been discussed above.
Respected sirs, I seek your advice.
Fareed Ahmed Sunkad
24 May 2015 at 11:22
Respected Sir, i want to know whether a TRUSTEE of EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION can be a EMPLOYEE (LECTURER) in same EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION.
ram mohan
14 May 2015 at 22:39
I had filed an SLP through efiling section in Supreme court againist an oeder by High court, and had ben allotted a dairy number, but SLP is in defective curative stage in registry of SCI. Now I want to with the SLP and to file reveiew petition in high court itself. I want to how to withdram my petition. as SLP is in Defective curative stage, it it necessary to withdraw, or not
MOHAN SINGH ROHILLA
11 May 2015 at 21:54
For becoming minister of state MP or MLA is first condition?
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
sc st atrocity
Sir... A girl proposed me and we were in relation for 3longvyears... Now me got some problems and instead of solving them she tell to their parents... And that too in such a way that... She made my name bad... Her mom calls me and scolded me by abusing me taking my caste... Am an Sc.. I took a step forward and went to their home and explained everything to her parents... There also they use bad words on my caste,.. Can I file a complaint on them..!!??