LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   29 October 2010 at 07:04

UPTU Delay..

Sir,

On the below provided information please suggest regarding last 3 queries..

References

1. www.gcet.ac.in
2. www.uptu.ac.in

I Have taken admission in regular M.Tech ( CS ) in GCET Greater Noida on 4-12-2007 in academic year 2007-08. The event happened as follows..

1. First examination schedule of first semester declared from 13-08-08, but canceled by university due to not completion of admit card process.DELAY = 8 MONTHS

2. Second examination schedule of first semester declared from 26-08-08, and examination conducted properly.
DELAY = 8 MONTHS

3. Declaration of result just one day before first exam of first semester for batch 2008-09 in January 2009.

4.18 May 2009 had meeting regarding second semester examination's, and took schedule for the same from UPTU Lucknow for commencing 7 June 2009.

5. 10-06-09 Starting examination of 2nd semester .
DELAY = 12 MONTHS

6. Declaration of Second semester result on 10 February 2010.


7. Putting scrutiny of all subjects on 12 and, 27 February 2010 for 2 Subjects each day as total i have 4 subjects.

8. Till date of 13 October 2010 university has not declared result of scrutiny.
n the head of compensation, I am thinking to do following
things.Please suggest what possible and allowed as per law

1. Asking permission for the regular job.

2. Asking for provisional or complete degree for M.Tech, as I am not
responsible if UPTU is delaying infinitely in activities of UPTU.

3. Asking compensation approximately Rs 50-60 Lacs for time delay and
mental harassment ( What do you feel regarding amount more / less or
ok.

4. Asking for providing the regular government job as many chances has
been lost due to this delay.


Please suggest..

1. Under which IPC Act petition should be filed ??

2.As I am going to file a case against UPTU Lucknow.I am having a fear in my mind that university is having my many result to declare.If I file a case they can intentionally put black points on my result with the purpose of revenge.How can I stop them to do so ??

3. Can vigilance Commission help me in this matter ?? I mean if i complaint in vigilance can i earn some benefit ?

Regards.

Anonymous   27 August 2010 at 14:29

MACT Award ( amt. Calulation)

Dear All,

I have been dealing with MACT Case, Can any body help me to calulate the Outstanding provision in MACT Cases. I want to know what is rule for calculating OSP In death and injury cases.

Thanks all.

Ashok Kamboj

Sanju   12 August 2010 at 20:17

problem for my moot court competition

Respected Sir/Madam,
I'm a fresher in law college. Next month I have my first moot court competition. I have attached the problem. Kindly help me to analyse the issues of the problem. Reply as soon as possible.
Thank You

Karishma   02 March 2010 at 12:00

Art.14 n MTP act

Thnks a lot Praveen sir n Patil sir,

i have a related query as well,

if i challenge whole of MTP act or only sec.3(2)of this act what shd b the grounds of pleading?
if i challenge sec.3(2) on d grounds of arbitrariness(Art.14) n right to privacy(Art.21) then how should i prove them?

n if i challenge whole of MTP on rt. to equality n rt. to life dn how shd i proceed??

i will b really greatful if u can take out some time n help me in my work.

thnks

Parthasarathi Loganathan   25 January 2010 at 19:30

Court Intervention

I have posted a query on Transport Woes in the Expert's forum. The facts in the issue are very glaring that though every citizen is aware of the plight, no concrete steps have been initiated to set things in order. Public Interest Litigation do not necessarily yield the desired results to highlight the matters which are detrimental to Public Interest at large. My specific doubts are summed up as under:

(a) As in the case of high profile matters, under which circumstances the Court intervenes into the matters which are detrimental to public interests?

(b) What are the Constitutional provisions and obligations on the part of the Apex or High Courts to question the authority of the State ?

(c) Is there any Judicial Committee which monitors the matters which upset the peace and tranquility in the State on account of misdemeanors of Public Authorities?

(d) Are there any precedents which match the similar facts where interests of common citizens are protected by the intervention of Courts?

(e) Whether any High Court is vested with any constitutional powers to question the acts of the State in the absence of any Public Interest Litigation?

I need specific point-war guidance from the expert panel in the interest of Common Citizens.