PRAVEEN CHOUDHARY
16 July 2010 at 16:04
what is the interpretation of the judgement?
some points
1. whether interview of the all the candidates will be conducted a fresh?
2. whether interview of the only of those candidates which come inside after revising of result acc. raw marks?
hon, ble court said result null and void.
result=marks obtained in wriiten examination+marks obtained in interveiw.
how interview is constitutional according rajasthjan public service commisiion?
kindly reply.
Reshma
15 July 2010 at 20:23
We need to engage the services of an expert who has dealt with MACT cases before.
All the ground work and papers have been prepared already - we just need someone who will take the case seriously and give it due time and attention.
If interested please contact via this forum and we can take it further.
Thanks
Ms. R P Singh
Anonymous
15 July 2010 at 19:38
The people who are just encroaching roads,creating trouble for traffic by their roadside Rehri,Dhaba,Khokha--they have been given Tay-Bazari shops on the footpaths of busy roads/market of Delhi-- ignoring the fundamental rights of the pedestrians to walk on the footpaths,ignoring that these Tay Bazar shops are jeopardizing whole traffic system,ignoring that such shops are eating the business of Legal/authorized shops which have been purchased after paying Lakhs/Crores of Rupees.
How on earth Delhi/Indian Govt. allow almost a legal status to such Tay -Bazari shops.
If some one misused public land --should he be punished or allotted another piece of land just because he was misusing that piece of land for years ?
How to get rid of all such Tay-Bazari shops legally ?
pawan sharma
13 July 2010 at 17:37
i. kindly provide the verdit of hon'ble apex court on the point of higher judicial service exam.
ii. can a public prosecutor or assistant public prosectuor or law officer of centre / state have 07 years experience before joining his post apply to the post of ADJ,
decison of the supreme court or high courts may kindly be attached or cited.
please comments
Anonymous
13 July 2010 at 09:49
Dear All,
Time and again during court proceedings the judges try to intimidate the new comers to this noble profession by asking discomfort questions (if somebody asks for pass over the remark would be what your senior will be able to do as if I have already made up my mind to dismiss your case etc.etc.) and what is the way out for this.
Best Regards
Anonymous
dharmeshyogi
12 July 2010 at 16:03
Respected Sir,
With due respect i wish to know that a society (society registered under MP registrar of societies and firms) members can withdrawn amount as a remuneration from the society. society being an private unaided educational institute. Is that possible. please make your conclusion if possible by referring any particular section of the act applicable on the society mentioned here above.
Thanking you in anticipation.
chandra shakher joshi
09 July 2010 at 21:35
dear members,
Ugc is organizing NET examination in June and Dec. every year, since many years for lecturer ship. There was no provision of negative marketing. In the Net Examinations of Dec.2009 UGC imposed condition of negative marking in paper 1 and 2. Now in recent notification from UGC the condition of negative marking has been vaved from NET examination of June 2010. Thus the condition of negative marking was made applicable for the candidates appeared in Dec.2009 Examination.
My daughter appeared in the NET examination of Dec.2009 and she was declared unsuccessful for only 1 number in paper 1 and 2. If the condition was not made applicable for Examination of Dec.2009 she would have been cleared it.
This is clear cut case of unequal opportunity in the eyes of constitution as no equity has been maintained.
Please guide me what I have to de and take legal steps. I have already written a letter to UGC for reconsideration of the matter and lifting condition of negative marking from all examinations and re announcing the result accordingly.
Anonymous
09 July 2010 at 07:42
Q1)please give me info @ ,sanctioned post of motor driver in your office, working driver list with name , posting date answer) ,5 is sanctioned post , 4 is working post, disclosure of name/detailed information of the officials working as motor drivers is exempted under 8(1) g of rti act. Q2) running of vehicle per year from 2000 to 2010 answer) available information from only 2005 detail is ..... Q3) copy of information book of vehicle where mentioned average per kilometer is mentioned answer) vehicle company has not given average of the running km per liter in writing to this office. PLEASE GIVE ME SUGGESTION FOR FURTHUR ACTIONED
Dr.Mukesh Yadav
08 July 2010 at 12:06
Dear Sir
I have filed a PIL in the Supreme Court in 2008 (Case No.W.P.No.124 of 2008) under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. Case is fixed for final disposal since August 2009, but every time date is postponed. This time No date is displayed for hearing. I am feeling frustrated that if I am not able to get justice from Apex Court where should I go? to whom I should contact?
I want t plead my own case along with some Senior Advocate please guide me and oblige
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
consumer case
i construct building which completed on september 2007 . muncipalties allot completion certificate on 15 september 2007. in that building two flate owner get possession from me on date 14 october 2007.but final sale dead is registered on 10 october 2008 where clearly mention that he take possession of flate on 14 october 2007 in this building society is not form because of dispute on monthly maintenance cost .this flate owner is police constable both give harrasement me , both filed consumer complaint in maharashtra against me on date 15 june 2010.consumer court accept his complaint & send me notice, in complaint he say 20 sq feet area is less provided , dampness on wall,etc. please give me help against this harrasement