Anonymous
13 November 2009 at 22:19
IT APPEARS THE DIRECTIONS ARE BEING IMPLEMENTED MORE IN VIOLATION THAN IN COMPLIANCE.
DELHI HIGH COURT
TIMES OF INDIA.
Adv.Aiyer VLV
12 November 2009 at 22:28
In this era of
a) High cost of legislators
b) flood ravaged state
c) slum dog millionaire and many more expose of our country poverty (which is nothing but truth),
in assembly a Congress MLA (having vested interest) claimed a NGO used photos of school children abroad, Claimed children are to be fed and brought disrepute to the country by saying there are poor children and poverty. Government has not been mentioned as a partner of the program. (This government does not pay full amount. only subsidised value. The NGO does work in multiple States covering 10 lakh children)
A House Committee has been formed to investigate the usage of photo, collection of money, bringing disrepute to COUNTRY.
The terms of reference is not stopping only at this, it says all other NGOs in which trustees of this NGO are involved and their irregularities. (on vested interest of course)
1. Trust is not given any signed communication. secretary says that is how it will be. Resolution passed by the house etc. nothing is available.
2. anything talked about the whole issue will be violating privilege of house
1. Is it within the powers of house to form a committee and look into whatever it wants from whoever's account?
2. what are the real rights or privileges of the house committee?
3. what are the rights and how far the NGO is liable to dance to the tunes of EGO of MLA?
4. What legal actions it can take (like Writ to safe guard privacy) in this regard to safe guard its interest.
5. can NGO ask for video recording of whole proceedings? (there are apprehensions
6. All documents, resolutions etc. are out of RTI reach?
7. Can any legal proceeding be initiated for legislators wasting their valuable (our cost) time ?
regards
VLV
PS: Hope this is not breach of privilege to discuss
adv.abhay s. patil
10 November 2009 at 14:39
Sir, in maharashtra last month assambly election was finished.
in that election notification was published on 18/9/2009 and last date to filed nomination was 25/9/2009.
but after 25/9/2009 one voters supplimentry list was published in my vidhansabha sang.that list was published on 28/9/2009.4500 and more voters vote from that last list.
and my query is that ---
-- Weather that voter list is valid?
-- Is any ony from that last published list can get relif from court 'that he have not get the chance to contest election because election commession published that list after the last date of nomination?
-- Is the second runup candidate can filed a petition against election commession on this ground undrs representative of people act sec.23(3)?
Plese support me and answer me.
Anonymous
10 November 2009 at 14:34
Sir, in maharashtra last month assambly election was finished.
in that election notification was published on 18/9/2009 and last date to filed nomination was 25/9/2009.
but after 25/9/2009 one voters supplimentry list was published in my vidhansabha sang.that list was published on 28/9/2009.4500 and more voters vote from that last list.
and my query is that ---
-- Weather that voter list is valid?
-- Is any ony from that last published list can get relif from court 'that he have not get the chance to contest election because election commession published that list after the last date of nomination?
-- Is the second runup candidate can filed a petition against election commession on this ground undrs representative of people act sec.23(3)?
Plese support me and answer me.
Anonymous
07 November 2009 at 13:23
i just want to know about ....The Right of children to free and complusory education bill...passed b our parliament..........that from when it will come in to operation.....................
and i need the copy of bill?
1- To what an extent govt canbe made liable to provide free educaton?
2-- What is the procedure to get the benefit of this law?
3- can the financial stable people also claim the right of free education for their ward?
---------------plz guide me as soon as possible...........its very urgent.........
Ayusman Mahanta
06 November 2009 at 23:37
can fundamental right of a child(under 15yrs) be violated under article 21,19(2)and 39(f), if exposed to obscenity in print media? For ex Ajay Goswami v. Union of India.Can obscenity in print media so grave to children that it can raise a question on freedom of press.I need some strong points for moot court.
PJANARDHANA REDDY
04 November 2009 at 22:56
1. Hon'ble Shri K.G. Balakrishnan, Chief Justice of India
2. Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.H. Kapadia
3. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarun Chatterjee
4. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Altamas Kabir
5. Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.V. Raveendran
6. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalveer Bhandari
7. Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.K. Jain
8. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Markandey Katju
9. Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.S. Sirpurkar
10. Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Sudershan Reddy
11. Hon'ble Mr. Justice P. Sathasivam
12. Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.S. Singhvi
13. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Alam
14. Hon'ble Mr. Justice J. M. Panchal
15. Hon'ble Dr. Justice Mukundakam Sharma
16. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Cyriac Joseph
17. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly
18. Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.M. Lodha
19. Hon'ble Mr. Justice H.L. Dattu
20. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Verma
21. Hon'ble Dr. Justice B.S. Chauhan
22. Assets of Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.N. Agrawal, since retired on 15.10.2009, on special request.
The above declaration of assets is purely on voluntary basis.
Ayusman Mahanta
04 November 2009 at 17:04
1.what is principle of uniformity?
2.under what proviso SC frames issues on matters of wit petiton under article 32.Is order 14,rule 1 of cpc applies to SC while framing issues,when petion is under artcle 32.
3.Is it mandatory for SC to accepts the persuasive authority of lower courts.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
EX MLA Pension
This is to bring to your notice that Mr. Tapubhai Vaghela is an Ex MLA of Gujarat State. At the age of 87 he is not getting any pension from either Maharashtra Govt or any pension from Gujarat Govt. Now he is dead and his wife should be getting pension. He has also written many communication mails which is enclosed as below. I would like you to bring this issue to the notice of the Govt through your popular news media. What steps he can take further? TAPUBHAI VAGHELA (Ex-MLA, Maharashtra (Bombay State & Gujarat State MADHUVAN, 8 Ramkrishna Nagar, Vidyanagar Main Road, Rajkot 360 002. (Gujarat Ph. (0281 6545744)
Dear Sir, Sub:- Stoppage of pension that Maharashtra Government sanctioned to the members of Legislative Assembly of Bombay (1952-57 & 1957-62 from Gujarat state). My name is Tapubhai P. Vaghela, Ex-MLA, Maharashtra (Bombay State & Gujarat State, elected from Kunkavav (Gondal region under Bombay state constituency of Bombay Legislative Assembly for the period 1957-1962.) In the year 1960, the State of Bombay was bifurcated into two new States of Maharashtra and Gujarat by the Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960. The present State of Maharashtra came into being on 1 May 1960. I was one among 132 members who came under the purview of Gujarat Legislative Assembly from Bombay Legislative Assembly, elected from Gujarat. The Maharashtra Government has sanctioned pension under Maharashtra Legislature Member’s Pension Act 1976. Under this act any member elected from Bombay Legislative Assembly during 1957 was eligible for pension. This also includes the members elected from the region, which later on came under the purview of Gujarat Legislative Assembly by the applicability of the Bombay Reorganisation Act 1960. There were 14 members of Gujarat constituency who were held eligible to receive pension by Maharashtra Vidhansabha. Hence, w.r.t. letter no 27701/PENCEL dtd. 17.09.1999 of Maharashtra Vidhansabha, I have received pension with all the arrears w.e.f. 01.04.1977 to 30.06.2002. All of a sudden this pension was stopped w.e.f. 01.07.2002 by letter no 2792/H/PENCEL dtd. 14.02.2002 without prior intimation. It is quiet surprising that though the Maharashtra Legislature Member’s Pension Act 1976 was never amended, after paying the pension for 25 years, it was stopped at once by misconception of the act through the letter by Maharashtra Vidhansabha as mentioned above. By this atrocious act by Maharashtra Vidhansabha, I am hung by very tough condition financially, mentally & physically, with no source of income to meet up my and my wife’s requirements at the age of 85 years. As I am not under condition to fight against the Government through judicial court, I humbly request you to look into this matter at your earliest for suitable justice to me. Thanking you, Faithfully, TAPUBHAI VAGHELA Ex-MLA, Maharashtra (Bombay State & Gujarat State.)