Anonymous
02 November 2009 at 13:15
mr a is a bank officer and he is allegely inovlved in a bribe case and the matter was enquired in the cbi court and judgment came against mr.a and the bank dismissed him from service long back. at that time he was not paid anything and since then he is not getting any exgratia ftrom the bank. this happened eitht yearsback and mr. a also kept quiet as he did not want to extend the litigation and went for appeal in thigh court and the case is still pending
what is his right under constitutional law to live and maintgain his family without any source of income. he is neither getting any benfefit nor any pension he stuggled all these eight yers and without the kknowledge of thelaw and fear of inviting more problems and no guidanance to him as per constitutional law, has he any right undercontitutional alw to get back his benefits from thenationalised bank
kindly advise him and if possible please refer a good and famous advocate in hyhderabd
thank yousir
Anonymous
01 November 2009 at 00:47
What are the detailed aspects concerning the Elections in India ? ie. Who pays for the expenses for the center as well as the state elections which do occur of and on just due to the politics and for their benefits ?
Why should the people who pay the tax be victims of the politicians to pay for the same, through taxes, etc. ?
Who decides about the expenses ? and by whom are they made up ?
The above mentioned questions are being asked by Adv. Terrance, who is available at ad.terrance@gmail.com
Anonymous
01 November 2009 at 00:23
Now a days private news TV channals and print media are not following ethics of journalism.
Is freedom to media necessary in india?
Anonymous
31 October 2009 at 11:30
jaipur bench's judgment on scaling in RJS exam. Filing fresh petitions in similar matter after the judgment. how to tackle the point of delay in filing the writ.
Member (Account Deleted)
30 October 2009 at 18:01
A writ petition it just filed,,,may be listed in next week. After filing it is discovered that
1. there is a mistake in the adderess of respendent no1.
2. the respondent no 2 have shifted to its old address.
Is amendment of the petiton necessary?
What is the procedure to amend the writ petiton? If copy is served to respondent no.2 to its new address without amending the petition what will be the effect?
Member (Account Deleted)
30 October 2009 at 17:58
A writ petition it just filed,,,may be listed in next week. After filing it is discovered that
1. there is a mistake in the adderess of respendent no1.
2. the respondent no 2 have shifted to its old address.
Is amendment of the petiton necessary?
What is the procedure to amend the writ petiton? If copy is served to respondent no.2 to its new address without amending the petition what will be the effect?
Member (Account Deleted)
30 October 2009 at 17:52
A writ petition have been just presented,,,may be listed in next week. After filing I discovered that firstly there is a mistake in the address of the respondent no.1 ,
and secondly respondent no.2 have been shifted from its old address.
Please guide me how to correct the petition? Is amendment necessary? What is the procedure? If I serve copy to the respondent no. 2 to its new address without amending the petition what will be the effect?
Abhay
30 October 2009 at 16:09
dear sir,
i have to prepare for constitutional law as i m participating in quiz compitition on constitution......can anybody plz provide me contitutional objective type questions????
thanks......
Anonymous
30 October 2009 at 16:08
I wish to know from professionals(LAW), That what does law states about abusing a handicap.Can a person suffering from Disability can sue in a court of law on the culprit?
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Equal status of the national Song
Hi,
As per my knowledge, National song and NAtional anthem enjoy equal status in the constitution of india. but i am unable to trace the exact provision in the constitution or any other legislation specifically stating this. Government of India's official site also says that thsy enjoy equal status, but doesn't quote any legal authority for the same. (see http://india.gov.in/knowindia/national_song.php)
(Addendum - in view of recent fatwa issued against Vande Mataram)
Section 3 of the THE PREVENTION OF INSULTS TO NATIONAL HONOUR ACT, 1971 punishes individuals from preventing of singing National anthem, but it is applicable only for national anthem, but not the national song. unless we can quote a legal authority giving equal status to both, we cannot apply this section for preventing the singing of National Song.
Provisions of National Hounour Act -
s.3. Prevention of singing of Indian National Anthem, etc. Whoever intentionally prevents the singing of the Indian National Anthem or causes disturbance to any assembly engaged in such singing shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both
can anyone advise me upon the same..