my friend servicing as 4th grade cader in the navy as civilian in dockyard as per his statements he has not got promototion while the other person who joined later than my friend all promototed and got promotion now he wants to proceeds in the highcourt for the promotion on the said matter under the article 226 is that really propery remedy
my friend servicing as 4th grade cader in the navy as civilian in dockyard as per his statements he has not got promototion while the other person who joined later than my friend all promototed and got promotion now he wants to proceeds in the highcourt for the promotion on the said matter under the article 226 is that really propery remedy
ramya is a govt. employee.an attempt on her life was made by ravi for rejecting his love proposal.ramya succumbed to injuries.now,the government issues an order
inducting krishna,ramya's brother,into govt. service on compassionate grounds.what is the legal position? is it constitutionally valid?
Dear Friends,
Recently I got a legal opinion regarding citizenship.I need your opinion regarding this matter.
My Client is from Taiwan Country. Now his wife pregnant. His wife wants to deliver her child in India so that he can get citizenship of India. Is this Possible??
I think at present position this is not possible in India. do you think so??
Is their any other way to become a citizen of India of a new born child of a FOREIGNER COUPLE??
Please give your opinion.
Sir,
I have done my LLB from university of allahabad but I have never done any internship. This creates problem in drafting a writ.I accept this forum as my guru please help me by telling the basics of writ drafting.
Your sincerely
Dhirendra
Hi all
What circumstances under writ can be premature. Thanks in Advance.
Sanjeev desai
Can the right to speedy trial be termed as Fundamental Right? If so, what will be the
Is the subordinate judiciary empowered to enforce the fundamental rights?
What does the term "Procedure established by law" as enshrined in the Art. 21 of the
Constitution of India have in its ambit?
Removal by parliament
My question is--
Who of the following cannot be removed by the parliament?
(a) Attorney General
(b) Auditor General
(c) Election Commissioner
(d) Chief Justice of India
Resp. expert members if possible pls give explanation also.
[The question was asked in UPHJS(Pre)2009 Exam, my brother was a candidate and I want to know the correct answer of this question.]
Thanks in advance.