Ziaur Rahman
26 July 2009 at 12:56
By virtue of the West Bengal Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act 1976,the juniors in the same rank belonging to general category were superseded in grant of promotion by their colleaguer belonging to scheduled castes and scheduled tribes upon their seniors (of general category in gradation list) in feeder post by virtue of a 100 point roster preapred by the State Government. As a result the seniors were not only superseded in ranks but also started receiving less salary in comparison to their juniors who were promoted to the next higher rank .When the general category candidates were promoted to the next higher rank they were considered junior in that rank and were palced at the bottom of the gradation list below their SC/ST counterparts and are being less paid in their salay than their junior scheduled caste and scheduled tribe counterparts who had superseded them under the Act. What is the remedy before the employees of general category. Why the y should be discriminated twice by the ST/SC employees, once in rank and aother in salry and perks.Does not it violate the Constitution on the point of equality.What is remedy against this inequality?
Tarun Kalra LL.M, M.B.A
21 July 2009 at 06:15
hello sir,
how r u?
there is a case with me for section 125 or crps, i am from the side of respondent boy, the boy is not earning anything, i.e he is workless, and his father sold his parentel (ancent) land for rs 23 lakhs and made a fixed deposit of rs 4 lakh in the name of boy, the wife is living separtly from past 5 years and before 2 years he also took the boy son out of 3 sons of the couple, the father of respondent also submit rs 2lakh in the name of the boy with mother, now the women who was running a beauty parler may be closed the beauty parler or changed the place of work, we dont know, is demanding rs 5000 for herself and the son who is with her, on basis of cruelity and misbehave and demands of dowry from boy side, how we can avoid maintance liblty?
plz guide any authorities on workless boy?
TRIBHUVAN PUROHIT
15 July 2009 at 14:08
Dear Readers,
Please let me know the procedure of registering an assoication of persons working as arbitrators for various merchants.
Also please let me know about the procedure of registration.
Awaiting reply
Thanking you
Tribhuvan Purohit
tribhuvanempire@gmail.com
SRIPRAKASH BHATTACHARYA
12 July 2009 at 22:50
I SHALL BE OBLIGED IF THE LEGAL LUMINARIES MAKE IT CLEAR THAT IF IS WRITTEN AS "MEETING HAS TO BE HELD WITHIN 12 MONTHS FROM THE LAST PRECIDING MEETING (MEETING WAS HELD ON 13.07.2008)". DOES IT MEAN 12 CALENDAR MONTHS i.e. NEXT AUGUST 2009 OR 365 DAYS FROM 13.07.2009 i.e. WITHIN 12.07.2009.
REQUEST FOR DETAIL LOGICAL CLARIFICATIOS.
Sriprakash Bhattacharya
bhattacharyasriprakash@gmail.com
Pushkar Damle
09 July 2009 at 11:17
Hi, This is Pushkar Damle,
Can anyone help me in finding the documentary proof related to "Medical test is mandatory for a person who is being appointed as Public Servant".
you can mail it to pushkar_damle@rediffmail.com
B.B.R.Goud.
08 July 2009 at 17:32
study of Enginineering, Medicine, Law, Management, Sciences etc professional courses, can any one claim the protection under Art 21, Constitution of India ?
Diana
08 July 2009 at 13:16
can summoning of documents be treated as vioative of article 20(3) of the constitution. On what grounds it can be violative.
Shree.
07 July 2009 at 18:35
Whether order passed in violation of principles of natural justice is void ab-initio?
Raghav Singh
07 July 2009 at 17:27
This is very interesting case that is currently being argued before the DB comprising of the CJ of MP high court.(w.p.no.4778/2009)
The dipute is regarding the reservation of one orthodonitics seat in MGM medical college indore. There are in total 5 seats, out of which 2 are reserved for the candidates selected through national admission test, and 3 are reserved for the state.
Now out of 3 seats, 2 are reserved for the Sc/St and the OBC's and there is only 1 seat left which is being reserved for the female candidate(4th rank merit list) at the cost of the student who scored maximum marks in the entrance test.
The college authorities are of the view that they are following the rotation policy whereby the seat would again be an open seat for the next two years. it is important to recognise the interest of the women as per article 15(3) of the constitution.
but what about article 15(4) which specifically lays down that merit should be given preference. and further would it not amount to 100% reservation?
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Do something for the nation
we are going to live only one life!we should do some thing big and worthwhile to our people/nation as lawyers. Gandhiji has said" let the profession never stand in the way of your public service" i hereby call upon the members of this fourm to do something in the following problem. The Election Commission already announced to hold the bye-elections to fill the 14 casual vacancies in the State Assemblies of West Bengal, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, , Uttar Pradesh and Meghalaya on August 18 of 2009. why this bye-election? because the Our politicians gave up with elected seat with absolutely no respect to the voters who voted them and We have seen few sitting MLAs contested for a MP seat (or vice versa). after winning they surrendered the MLA seat. Existing MP/MLA should not be allowed to contest for another election,before the expiry of their current term, which causes waste of our (public) money and government machinery to conduct the elections to their vacated seats. people say that to solve this problem 1) EC should not allow candidates standing from multiple constituencies 2)Existing MP/MLA should not be allowed to contest for another election 3)the person who surrendered the seat should bear all the expenses.
( this message is posted in forum also http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/messages/2009/7/7441_are_we_true_lawyers_.asp to get the attention of the members and the public once again i am posting here in this section, hope you wont mind)
*************************************************
HOPE THE TRUE LAWYERS WILL MOVE THE APEX COURT REGARDING THIS TO SERVE THE MOTHER INDIA AND TO SAVE THE INNOCENT CITIZENS AND TO MAKE OUR NATION A BETTER PLACE FOR THE NEXT GENERATIONS
**************************************************