Samapika Tripathy
15 June 2010 at 18:18
Hello,
I was undergoing an article on Article.21 in which there was mentioned the "SAIL case and BALCO case" in which it has been held that "the Court does not has power to interpret the law passed by the Parliament. It shall abide by whatever law the Parliament has formed. Court has to keep alive the limitations i.e., the Parliament is supreme and it has to adhere to them. Thus in the current scenario we see that the Court has again gone back to the Strict positivist approach taken in Gopalan's case."
Can anyone please let me know which particular case is this and judgement delivered in which year?
Awaiting reply..
Dushyant Pandya
13 June 2010 at 13:53
Looking for Legal definition and characteristics of National Interest.
Please help or advice.
Anonymous
13 June 2010 at 00:11
Ld counsels,
Can anyone please suggest me a good book for law of writs (Indian Consitution).
It will be helpful if that covers the statutory procedures to conduct cases before HCs and SC.
Please help.
Thanks.
Anonymous
13 June 2010 at 00:05
Ld counsels,
In a counter affidavit of a writ case what format should the supporting documents be submitted. Is it mandatory to always file a typed set (ie, in green legal size) or is it OK to index in green paper along with the xerox copies of the document and submit with the counter affidavit.
I have few letters from government do I need to reproduce the entire contents in green paper or can I take a xerox in the green paper.
It may be a silly question but please clarify.
Thanks
Anonymous
12 June 2010 at 07:16
Is it possible for review of order of contempt in High Court?
BALAGANESH NADAR
11 June 2010 at 18:13
To
Lawyers Club
Sub: Request to clarify my doubts as follows
Dear Sir/Ma’am
I B.BALAGANESH, s/o G.BALASINGH, I am the member of our LAWYERS CLUB, After completing Bachelor of Business Law(B.B.L) I am pursuing LL.B 2nd Year in Asian College of Law, Sarsawa(U.P), New Delhi. I am the General Secretary of DHARMA SENA, and also legal adviser of various private voluntary organizations and trade unions.
In Tamil Nadu the state government produced one government order for abolishing the Names in other languages (Hindi & English) in the board of the firm (shops), the government compel the public to publish their firm’s Name only in tamil through that G.O, other ways they collect fine from the traders. In that G.O the state government said that every trader should publish their firm’s name:- a]5:5 size in tamil language(Big size & Compulsory) b]3:3 size in English language(Small size& optional) c]2:2 size in other languages(Very Small size & optional)
I am not agree with that G.O of the state government. Because it is only a G.O, it is not a Law, and also its violate the fundamental rights of Right to speech and expression, Right to carry on business.
In all records my signature is in Sanskrit language (T.N.Govt don’t like it) even then it is my individual right; like that Musalmaan’s publishing their firms name in some unknown foreign language (I don’t like that language) in friend of their shops. No body like it even then it is the right of him/her.
I want to issue notice against that G.O in among the public for creating awareness and also to disobey that G.O through private voluntary organizations. Hence you are humbly requested and pleased to furnish some previous judgments (rulings) regarding that “Expression through any language is the fundamental rights” and “Trader can publish their firm’s name in any language”
Anonymous
11 June 2010 at 16:25
i have been chargesheeted under u/s 323 & 324. however in the court order this is written as
1.above named accused volunterly hurt Mr.A that you have commited off. u/s 323
2. on the same intention you hurt To Mr. B with sharp weapon, you have commted off. u/s 324.
in this order in point 2 mr. b is mentioned instead of mr. a by mistake.
This can help me in any way. Secondly as per fir i broke the glass of tea and hurt fingures of Mr.A. But there is a false MLR. Police not recovered that piece of glass any fingure prints, not obtain any blood sample from place of incident. Basically this ldged by govt. doctor husband to humilate me. what should i do.
Recently he lodges a false fir u/s 326, but on my compliant ssp order inv., on that its founded by police false and in the process of cancellation, can it work as evidence for wrongness of my husband
advocateinindia
11 June 2010 at 12:14
Hello Members,
I am advocate, I want to file an appeal against the National Commission’s order and in Supreme Court, Kindly refer me a good and competitive advocate for Consumer matter practicing in Supreme Court…
where we have filled complaint under section 2 d (ii) of Consumer Protection Act, on the ground of consumer “as beneficiary of such services other than the person who hires the services for consideration paid”, Where An order has been passed in our favor from Dist. Consumer Forum the opposite party filled an appeal in state commission, where though legally all points were in our favor, but somehow state commission has issued order against us, while giving reason “the party in the suit cannot be said to be consumer”, due to new plea being taken up by the respondent’s lawyer. I cannot understand that the how state commission can issue such an order on the ground that we cannot be considered as a “consumer”, when the Dist. Consumer Forum has admitted our complain and after looking towards the fact has justified the matter in our favor?
Then after we have filed an appeal before the National Commission, where the National Commission has not looked into the fact of the matter, dismissed the appeal on its admission date itself, without looking towards the documentary proofs, citations & Legal aspects being taken up by us in the state commission. It just relied on the state commission’s order on only one point that “the party in the suit cannot be said to be consumer”. Then we filled review petition before the national commission again to get it justified again, but It was again dismissed by the commission with reason that “ petitioner seek to reargue the matter, which is not the scope of a review petition”.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
WHO IS PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER IN TEHSIL AND DISTRICT LEV
DEAR SIR,
ACTUAL I WANTED TO FILE A RTI APPLICATION IN TEHSIL GHAZIABAD(UTTARPARDESH) REGARDING THE INCOME AND CASTE CERTIFICATE , AS FAR AS I UNDERSTAND TEHSILDAR IS PIO , BUT I HAVE NOT FULL KNOWLEDGE IN THIS REGARD, SIR, WILL U TELL?
AND PLEASE TELL ME , IN DISTRICT LEVEL IS DISTRICT MAGISTRATE IS PIO,
PLEASESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSE UR CONSENT IS MANDATORY.
RAGARDS,