SAIL case and BALCO case
Samapika Tripathy
(Querist) 15 June 2010
This query is : Resolved
Hello,
I was undergoing an article on Article.21 in which there was mentioned the "SAIL case and BALCO case" in which it has been held that "the Court does not has power to interpret the law passed by the Parliament. It shall abide by whatever law the Parliament has formed. Court has to keep alive the limitations i.e., the Parliament is supreme and it has to adhere to them. Thus in the current scenario we see that the Court has again gone back to the Strict positivist approach taken in Gopalan's case."
Can anyone please let me know which particular case is this and judgement delivered in which year?
Awaiting reply..
