aditya vadali
01 May 2010 at 23:01
HAI FRIENDS,
I REQUEST THE EXPERTS TO PROCURE ME THE VALUES AND WHAT THE LAWYERS DRESS CODE EXACTLY RESEMBLES.
Anonymous
30 April 2010 at 21:01
what is the best way to keep a check on the judiciary?
TAHIR
30 April 2010 at 12:22
RESPECTED SIR, I HAVE A MOOT COURT PROBLEM, CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF PUBLIC SAFETY ACT[THIS IS AN ACT OF KASHMIR].UNDER THIS ACT A PERSON CAN BE PREVENTIVLY DETAINED. THIS IS ALMOST SIMILAR IN NATURE OF NATIONAL SECURITY ACT.I AM ON STATE SIDE AND I HAVE TO DEFEND THIS LAW. SO PLEASE PROVIDE ME MATERIAL IN MY SUPPORT.
Anonymous
29 April 2010 at 11:10
An order by electricity ombudsman lucknow has upheld the judgement passed by District electricity consumer forum in favour of the consumer. order of ombudsman challenged by electricity deptt before high court but deptt could not get any interim only time granted for counter and rejoinder. my question is whether deptt is liable to pay immediately to the consumer and if not paying what remedy available.
Anonymous
28 April 2010 at 10:49
My wife is a teacher at a Private School in Gurgaon. The school has issued a circular to all teachers demanding that they undertake Census Duty during the summer break. The notification says that this is manadatory and refusal could lead to imprisonment upto three years.
To me, this comes across as violation of fundamental rights. Firstly because, the school is neither a municipality or government funded / semi-funded school. Secondly, when the teachers asked about the provision of security while they are at this work, the authorities havent responded.
I wish to understand if this is a legal demand from the municipality and the school? Is this really manadatory, even though she is not a government employee? Is this a punisheable offence if she refuses to undertake this?
Member (Account Deleted)
24 April 2010 at 01:28
Sir, Can a service matter be raised as fundamental right through a petition under article 32 directly, even in the presence of alternative remedy through CAT?
Member (Account Deleted)
24 April 2010 at 01:27
Sir, Can a service matter be raised as fundamental right through a petition under article 32 directly, even in the presence of alternative remedy through CAT?
Anonymous
23 April 2010 at 20:10
Dear Sirs,
kindly tell as to what is 'Rule of Nisi' and what is meant when it is said that 'the rule of Nisi is being made absolute hereby'? Thanks.
Anonymous
23 April 2010 at 13:20
i am sangeeta.I am a hindu girl and want to marry with a Chirstian boy Emmanueil.Our parents are not allow us to marry with each other.his DOB is 9-nov-1983 and my is 30-aug-1985.we want to get marry with each other but we have the time only when we are on job time not more than and we never want to tell about aour marriag to our parents for 2 to 3 months.we want it secret for 2 to 3 months.what to do now.if we discuss it with our parents then they will forcly marry me with other boy but not with him.so we want to make secret this marriage for few time period so that our parents does not make any harm to us.Sorry my english is not so good so please understand what i want to say and what solution i need.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Please help me regarding RTI
An applicant approached an organisation - notified by a State Government in the official Gazette as a "intelligence and security organisation" - with an RTI application. The applicant approached the designated PIO of that organisation and asked for information that he claimed pertained to violation of his human right. At first, the PIO responded saying that the Public Authority concerned is not bound to give the information. When told that even an exempted organisation has to give information pertaining to human rights`violation, the PIO argued that he was not convinced that the information involved human right violation. The applicant mentioned to the PIO that he is well-versed with the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 and that he will not hesitate to pursue his case not just with the Information Commission concerned`, but if need be, he'd go all the way to the Supreme Court. Hearing this, the PIO felt that it would be o.k. to give information to the applicant right away to avoid any further hassles. In fact, the First Appellate Authority too had asked the PIO to do so Is the applicant right in thinking that he can go all the way to the Supreme Court seeking a remedy if he is not satisfied, because he thinks that the information he is seeking pertains to a violation of his human right?