Member (Account Deleted)
23 April 2010 at 01:05
sir, recently i filed an O.A. before CAT for my reinstatement in contractual services as my fundamental right to equality under art. 14 since all my juniors are retained
earlier also i filed a petition before high court on ground of harassment and no issue of discrimination was settled by high court and it was dismissed in limine speaking that there is no legal right vested in such employee to compel employer to continue him.
no issue of violation of article 14 was claimed/raised nor it was settled or decided
now as per my intusion the CAT is going to apply principles of res judicata in the present O.A. after severe agitation by respondent, while the present reinstatement is sought from a different period and right to equality is claimed as a recurrent greivance each time juniors are extended.hence cause of action is entirely different.
what can I do if CAT decides it against me although i have filed my protest and citations in favour. is it possible to apply res judicata against exercise of fundamental rights without going into merits of case, while CAT follows principles of natural justice and not CPC
sir is there any guarantee of fundamental rights if they are proved to be infringed and if no finding was given by court in earlier petition?
K.R.Rames
22 April 2010 at 10:12
I have served for 4 years and 6 months continuously in a company. Can I claim Gratuity? Is there any provision for claiming Gratuity. Please let me know.
Thanks...
Regards
K.R.Rames
mr_rames@yahoo.com
Anonymous
22 April 2010 at 09:01
hello friends,
i would request you to please furnish a draft copy in case of issuing a legal notice to the defendant in case of p.i.l
aditya vadali
22 April 2010 at 08:44
Respected sir/madam,
This is aditya, a law student requesting to furnish the court fee and other procedural costs to move a public interest litigation to A.P.H.C.
Anonymous
20 April 2010 at 17:41
In hope you would have got to see the Public Notice advertised in the Hindu
Use of “Dr”. can be prefixed by the physiotherapist before his/her name.
I would like to know is the Stand for Hindu to prevent it self from having published such advertisement.
Member (Account Deleted)
20 April 2010 at 01:21
wether any principle of res judicata can be applied in a case involving claim guaranteed under part third of constitution of india.
can a person be estopped from re-agitating an issue involving infringement of his fundamental rights?
sir can a claim under article 14 & 16 be agitated again if they were in issue in an earlier petition but not considered and decided by court?
Sajid
19 April 2010 at 20:55
Recently every one come across in the Newspaper that for the past 20years FAKE (Expire dated ) Medicines and drugs are sold to common people. By and large this crime was done by CONS AND DRUG AUTHORITY.
My question is that, the police arrested the sellers. Sellers are held as accused.
Please any one let us know , what the constitution says about the Authorities and other Govt official who involved in this crime, why they are not arrested ?
Anonymous
19 April 2010 at 16:01
hello all experts
in the field of my client geb instlling the HP POLE AND DP TOWER SO MY CLIENT PREVENT GEB STAFF BECAUSE AS PER THE ROOT MAP IT DOES NOT COME IN THE ROOT AREA OF THE GEB BUT WHEN I ARGUED THAT BY THE SHOWING THE ROOT MAP SCALE COLLECTOR DEMANDED FROM ME TO PRODUCE THE POLICTICAL MAP SO PLS TELL ME WHAT IS THE POLICTICAL MAP AND FROM WHERE IT IS AVALAIABLE
REGARDS
Anonymous
18 April 2010 at 22:56
All of you Hallo sir,i wan't know what is the procedure of filing appeal in public interest against municipal corporation who failed to provide basic facility of medical service for citizens health.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
About compulsory primary education.
Respected experts,
I want to know whether or not the two subsections are not contrary to each other in "The right of children to free and compulsory education Act, 2009, under section 14. The first sub.sec says, the age will be determined by the birth certificate for the purpose of admission. The second subsection says no child will be denied admission for the lack of age proof. please clarify this ambiguity.