Member (Account Deleted)
30 October 2009 at 17:58
A writ petition it just filed,,,may be listed in next week. After filing it is discovered that
1. there is a mistake in the adderess of respendent no1.
2. the respondent no 2 have shifted to its old address.
Is amendment of the petiton necessary?
What is the procedure to amend the writ petiton? If copy is served to respondent no.2 to its new address without amending the petition what will be the effect?
Member (Account Deleted)
30 October 2009 at 17:52
A writ petition have been just presented,,,may be listed in next week. After filing I discovered that firstly there is a mistake in the address of the respondent no.1 ,
and secondly respondent no.2 have been shifted from its old address.
Please guide me how to correct the petition? Is amendment necessary? What is the procedure? If I serve copy to the respondent no. 2 to its new address without amending the petition what will be the effect?
Abhay
30 October 2009 at 16:09
dear sir,
i have to prepare for constitutional law as i m participating in quiz compitition on constitution......can anybody plz provide me contitutional objective type questions????
thanks......
Anonymous
30 October 2009 at 16:08
I wish to know from professionals(LAW), That what does law states about abusing a handicap.Can a person suffering from Disability can sue in a court of law on the culprit?
Soma
29 October 2009 at 17:12
I have filed a writ petition (Calcutta High Court).
Please tell me which of the following modes are valid mode of service,
1. Personal service
2. Speed Post
3. Regd. Post
4. Coureer Service
Can any senior provide me the format of Notice which is to be send with the copy of the WRIT PETITION?
And also the format of AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE.
Member (Account Deleted)
28 October 2009 at 01:17
Our country is a member of United Nations. U.N. will treat caste discrimination as Human Rights violations. In our country reservations for Schedule Castes, Schedule Tribes, Backward classes, Minorities are going on. Is it not comes under caste discrimination?
Is our country violating U.N. Human Rights?
Please clarify.
SHYAMSUNDER BUBNA
26 October 2009 at 10:42
MAX PARTS PVT LTD incorporated on 12-8-1964
As on today Company Status is under Liquidation
Property Location
Revenue Survey No. 421/Paiki, Jamnagar, Hapa
Plot No. 13
T. P. Scheme No. 3/A
Original Plot (O.P.) No. 24
Final Plot (F.P.) No. 57
Near Paglam & Paglam
Opp. Cold Storage, Jamnagar
Area 7160 Sq. Ft.
Purchased by Company on 28th September 1964 from Shri Narendrasingh Madhusingh Kher by a agreement registered on 30th September 1964
On 30-4-1984
One Mr. Girjashanker Jatashanker Bhatt C/o. M/s. Harish Automobiles, Kashi Vishwanath Road, Jamnagar sold the property alleged to be Power of Attorney holder of the Company
to
one Mr. Kantilal K. Kotecha Advocate having address at J-5, 2nd floor, Super Market, Jamnagar and 26 Modern Market, Near Amber Cinema, Jamnagar on behalf of and alleged to be Power of Attorney holder of one Smt. Lilavanti Revashanker Bhatt, having address at Ambika Bhavan, 1 Nagar Para, Jamnagar
On 19-8-1993
Mr. Kantilal K. Kotecha Advocate having address at J-5, 2nd floor, Super Market, Jamnagar and 26 Modern Market, Near Amber Cinema, Jamnagar on behalf of and alleged to be Power of Attorney holder of one Smt. Lilavanti Revashanker Bhatt, having address at Ambika Bhavan, 1 Nagar Para, Jamnagar sold the property
to
1) Smt. Jaishreeben Arvindkumar Machchhar having address at Bhanushalee Wad, Sheri No. 4, Jamnagar
2) Smt. Jyotiben Prakashkumar Lakhani having address at Nagar Para near Pili Bangli, Jamnagar
On 20-3-1998
Smt. Jaishreeben Arvindkumar Machchhar having address at Bhanushalee Wad, Sheri No. 4, Jamnagar released the property
To
Smt. Jyotiben Prakashkumar Lakhani having address at Nagar Para near Pili Bangli, Jamnagar
As per record with Jamnagar Area Development Authority as on 17-4-2006 the property is in the name of Company
The Company was initially formed by one Shri Jamnadas G. Jivrajani at Bombay
The previous directors retired in or about May 1975 and
1. Shyamsunder S. Bubna
2. Jeevanlata S. Bubna
has been joined as directors of the Company.
On 19-7-1983 a notice sent to the Share Holders and also published the said notice in Mah Gov Gazette dated 28-7-1983 and English and Marathi News Paper under Sec 500 of Companies Act as the information for meeting of creditors to be held on 11-8-1983
On 8-9-1983 the notice for information under sec 516 for appointment of Liquidator has been published in Mah Gov Gazette and English and Marathi News Paper
On 7-6-1984 the notice for information under sec 509 notice convening final meeting has been published in Mah Gov Gazette and English and Marathi News Paper
P.S. THE ALLEGED POWER OF ATTORNEY OF MAX PARTSPVT. LTD. FAVOURING MR. GIRJASHANKER JATASHANKER BHATT USED FOR SALE OF PROPERTY ON 30-4-1984 IS LIKELY TO BE PREPARED AND EXECUTED IN BOMBAY AS ALL THE DIRECTORS AS WELL AS LIQUIDATOR AND/OR COMPANY IS ALSO INCORPORATED AT BOMBAY ONLY
Member (Account Deleted)
24 October 2009 at 19:40
In our country for every law there is a remedy. Due to fundamental rights provided in our constitution several culprits are escaping from law or prolonging cases in the court. Due to hierarchy system in judicial from lower court to Supreme Court culprits are taking advantage. One court, final judgment. No appeal should not permit to higher courts except in death sentences.
Please comment.
Member (Account Deleted)
22 October 2009 at 13:40
In Andhra Pradesh one District Collector declared one active MLA is not belonging ST community and issued orders after enquiry. That MLA elected on ST certificate.MLA appealed to the High Court of Andhra Pradesh. HC suspended District Collector's order. Due to suspension of the order MLA got relief.
My question is
1)A District Collector is a IAS officer and Magistrate of the District also.Once He/She issued orders about genuinity of a peoples representative's caste after full inquiry on what grounds HC suspends District Collector's order?
2)Why HC not taken action against MLA?
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Amendment of WRIT
A writ petition it just filed,,,may be listed in next week. After filing it is discovered that
1. there is a mistake in the adderess of respendent no1.
2. the respondent no 2 have shifted to its old address.
Is amendment of the petiton necessary?
What is the procedure to amend the writ petiton? If copy is served to respondent no.2 to its new address without amending the petition what will be the effect?