Bhavna
11 February 2009 at 11:19
Hello Sir/ Madam,
This is inform you that my marriage is broken, reason being the extreme mental and physical torcher I had been through. That guy and his family are so greedy, so cruel, they used to abuse me and beat me like hell, my husband tried to kill me one day. Finally my Father came to take me out of that hell. We tried a lot from our side to save the relationship but that fellow wanted Octavia car (worth approx. - 17 lack) that we couldn't afford finally he desserted me. Now he wants divorce.There was no option left for us rather than legal actions, this matter has gone to court.
My Husband was arrested and he was there at Jail for 4 day, then he managed to get the bail.He is charged Under Law Section 498A, 506, 34. The case is going on.
That Guy in fact never wanted me to be with him, inspite of trying to patch up using conjugal rights etc, he has applied for judicial separation. I want to know that if the matter is in court is it advisable to go to Human rights commission and national women's counsil, If Yes how can i approach them ?
I need some legal advice from you people regarding my case.
Thanks.
Ziaur Rahman
09 February 2009 at 22:02
A person was wanted in a criminal case.He surrendered before the magistrate.The magistrate granted him bail.But in order sheet he did not write that he was first taken into custody by him on his surrender and then granted bail.Subsequently he was acquitted from the case. The said person applied for a governmentjob and in his verification form in answer to a question "whether arrested?" he wrote "No". He was denied the job for making a false declaration.His advocate says that since the magistrate while enlarging him on bail did not write in the order sheet that he was taken into custody on his surrender so it can be safely presumed that he was not arrested and that the surrender did not meant arrest.The law officer of government opined that the surrender before the magistrate and subsequent enlargement on bail will be deemed to be arrest by the the magistrate and then enlargement on bail. What is the position of law? Can a magistrate Grant Bail to an accused person on surrender before his court without taking him in the custody? Since the magistrate has not written in the order sheet that the accused was taken into custody and then granted bail then will it be considered an implied custody? kindly answer with the reference of the law or rulings whether the law is in favour of the candidate or not?
kanwar Lal
09 February 2009 at 18:53
Complaint u/s 138 is pending against the accused.court declared po to the accused. now can complainant go for attachement of movable property of the accused? if yes under which provision.can we attache movable property or not.
s.chandra
08 February 2009 at 17:36
Sir,
I have 48 cases of section 420,467,468,471,120b running in Agra against me. I am 64 years old and finding it difficult to attend them all one by one in different courts. Cases are about 5 years old.
These all cases are from one current account and are about 48 transactions of drafts encashed through this account.
About 80% of the witnesses are the same in all cases.
I wish to get them clubbed. What is the remedy?
Is it possible that I may be exempted from attending to these cases in person?
S.Chandra
09319053491
SRIPRAKASH BHATTACHARYA
07 February 2009 at 23:36
07.02.2009
DEAR SIRS,
SHALL BE GRATEFUL IF ANYONE LETS ME KNOW IF IT IS A CRIMINAL OR OTHER TYPE OF OFFENCE FOR INSTIGATING PEOPLE TO BOYCOT THE REPUBLIC DAY FUNCTION (IN OUR CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY BY SOME MEMBERS) EITHER AS PER THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA OR INDIAN PENAL CODE.
CAN WE FILE A FIR AGIANST SUCH PEOPLE? IF SO, KINDLY LET ME KNOW THE RESPECTIVE CLAUSE OF INIAN PENAL COE AS WELL AS REF OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, IF POSSIBLE.
SHALL BE GRATEFUL IF AN EARLY REPLYI SENT.
THANKING YOU IN ANTICIPATION AND WITH REGARDS.
YOURS FAITHFULLY
Sriprakash Bhattacharya, KOLKATA
email: bhattacharyasriprakash@gmail.com
Tel: 09836310615
Gaurav
07 February 2009 at 22:15
An accused convicted by the Trial court in Murder case, filed an appeal in the High Court. The High Court upheld the conviction by the Trial Court.
Now what is the remedy for the accused and under what section? Please help.
Jainodin shaikh
07 February 2009 at 15:28
What is the current position of sec. 324 of I.P.C.
I mean, the offence u/s 324 is bailable or non-bailable?
Is there any notification published in this regard?
Jainodin shaikh
07 February 2009 at 12:46
Demand notice required uner The Negotiable Instrument Act having signature only of advocate and not of the any authorised person of the complainant bank.
Whethe it can be treated as a LEAGAL notice.
If the complainant failed to prove his case; in that circumstances from whom Damages will be claim (advocate or the bank)?
Sameer
07 February 2009 at 11:30
please advice
i have purchased a land from A by paying him half the amount of total consideration with some conditions like measuring the land,removing the encrochement, the land not reserved,etc.but all conditions was not fulfilled by the sellar so i issued him notice to comply the conditions in sale deed and in event of the conditions are not fulflllied i will be restrained to stop the cheque thouh he did not reply my notice and not fulfilled the comditions mentioned in the registered sale deed so i stopped the cheque, my account was having more than amount of cheque. he presented the cheque to the bank my bank sent him the memo with having remark as payment stopped by the drawer, so he sent me notice u/s 138 ni act i promptly replied to it mentining tjhe facts,but he filed with criminal case u/s 138 against me, the more of the above is that he supressed the facts of the sale deed from the magistrate,so he issued the process, here what remedy is available to me i am very much afraid because it the criminal case me.I am ready to pay the said amount as soon as he compleates the what he has agreed in the sale deed.
kindly help me by sending me the recent judjements of the hon courts.
please help me.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Attempt to cause injury or murder.
My friend's brother X had some enmity with my friend Y regarding a property. The case regarding the propety is in the court. Once
X scolded Y's wife pretending that she had tresspassed his property which is under dipute.Y's wife complained to the police about this. The SI called X to the police station. But X didnt turned up. The matter was subjected to its natural end.
One week ago Mr.X left the town and during that time My frined while crossing the property building he had a terible electic shock when he touched the wall of the locked house situated in the propery.
At once he was taken to a near by clinic and after some time he complained about this at the police station. The S.I visited the spot and arranged with the E.B to disconnect the supply to the house.
At that time the SI told that he will take actiono againstX when he returns to the town.
Yesterday X returned to town and the SI called X to the station.But as usual he didnt bothered. But today he came to the police station and told to the SI that he is innocent and as he was out of station he has nothing to say about the incidence and he is totally unware of that.
However The SI received a statement from X that he has not commited any crime and he will not do in future also.
But My friend is totally disappinted with this and he feels as if justice is not done to him.
The SI has not attempted to see what Mr X has done in the locked house to give electric shock when any one touches.
In one or two days Mr X will return to the house. ( He is having another house in the town and he will use this house also frequenty)
My friend Y says that when X opens the house he will dismantle all the elctrical connections and will pretend as if the shock was due to some electrical leakage in the wire.
How to establish the truth and what action my friend must take. It seems that the SI is favouring Mr X for reasons unknown