vipul vakharia
20 January 2009 at 22:18
Animals are seized from the truck , there was no permit for carriying the cattle & without complying the neccesary provision of law. The accused has filled petition to take interim custody of cattle pending inquary . The pajarapole has a rights to be heard before passing any order by judicial megitrate if yes under what law ? as an advocate of welfare body like pajarapole do not want to give inturim costody to bucher .what should be the arguments.
Jainodin shaikh
20 January 2009 at 15:11
In a proceeding u/s 125 of Cr.P.C. stage is for defence evidence. Non applicant filed his affidavit. It his affidavit some important points and point related with documents filed by the non applicant are not mentioned by mistake of his council. But those point are very impportant for the defence of the non applicant. QUESTION: Is it possible for the non applicant to be called or recalled himself as a witness? Is there any case law?
Jainodin shaikh
20 January 2009 at 15:10
In a proceeding u/s 125 of Cr.P.C. stage is for defence evidence. Non applicant filed his affidavit. It his affidavit some important points and point related with documents filed by the non applicant are not mentioned by mistake of his council. But those point are very impportant for the defence of the non applicant. QUESTION: Is it possible for the non applicant to be called or recalled himself as a witness? Is there any case law?
Jainodin shaikh
20 January 2009 at 15:10
In a proceeding u/s 125 of Cr.P.C. stage is for defence evidence. Non applicant filed his affidavit. It his affidavit some important points and point related with documents filed by the non applicant are not mentioned by mistake of his council. But those point are very impportant for the defence of the non applicant. QUESTION: Is it possible for the non applicant to be called or recalled himself as a witness? Is there any case law?
Jainodin shaikh
20 January 2009 at 15:09
In a proceeding u/s 125 of Cr.P.C. stage is for defence evidence. Non applicant filed his affidavit. It his affidavit some important points and point related with documents filed by the non applicant are not mentioned by mistake of his council. But those point are very impportant for the defence of the non applicant. QUESTION: Is it possible for the non applicant to be called or recalled himself as a witness? Is there any case law?
Mahesh V.P.
19 January 2009 at 11:59
If Mr.A helps Mr.B to murder Mr.X, then Mr.B can be charged under Sec.302 IPC and Mr.A can also be charged U/s.302 read with Sec.109. My question is about the scope of Sec.109, will it be limited to offence mentioned in IPC or will its scope extend beyond IPC, say for an offence relating to Pollution Control Act.
Ranganath
19 January 2009 at 01:37
Ld cousels,
My wife has taken away jewelry gifted to her by me during wedding, which also includes mangal sutra in gold. Mangal sutra is a valuable item shared between husband and wife. She is refusing for re-union and refusing to give the jewellry. Can I file a 406 against her. I have bills for all hte jewelry.
Is it possible that she will claim ownership of all the wedding gifts gifted by me.
please clarify
Somnath mukherjee
17 January 2009 at 22:17
PLEASE SEND ME SOME JUDGEMENTS WITH CITATIONS IN WHICH THE COURT PASSED THE AQUITAL ORDER. WHAT IS THE BASIC NEED TO FORM A CHARGE UNDER THIS SECTION.WHETHER THE COURT CAN FORM A CHARGE IN THE FOLLING CASE AS STATED UNDER.
THE VICTIM'S MOTHER FILED A CASE ON APRIL 2007 REGARDING A INCEDENT OF 29/11/2006 AND THE MEDICAL PRESCRIPTION DOESNOT CLEARY SAID THAT WHAT IS THE CAUSE OF MISCARRIAGE AND THRE IS NO HOSPITAL REPORT REGARDING THE INCEDENT.THERE NO F.I.R ON THIS INCEDENT ON THAT DAY AND A GD WAS LODGED ON 16/2/2007.NO INFORMATION WAS SEND TO HUSBAND AT TIME OF THIS MIS CARRIAGE.
Jainodin shaikh
17 January 2009 at 22:04
In a private complaint alleging an offence punishable u/s 395 of I.P.C. is committed by six accused persons; the magistrate issued process u/s 380, 341, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 of I.P.C. and not u/s 395. Accused persons have given their appearance in the case and the matter is fixed for Evidence Before Charge. I am of the opinion that all the ingredients of secs. 380, 341, 323,34 are sufficient to constitute the offence of Dacoity punishable u/s 395. Now I want to move an application on behalf of the complainant to alter the Charge which can be alter at any stage of proceding. The questions is can I apply for alteration of charge before the stage of E.B.C.?
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
sentence to a juvenile offender in a murder case
Sir
what sentence can be awarded to a juvenile offender in a murder case by principal magistrate of juvenile justice board........Minimum & maximum PLz Help its Most Urgent....Thanks