pabba sandeep
23 August 2008 at 13:05
can we file a fresh 498a petition if we withdrawn it before for purpose of compramise for mutual divorce...
Rajan Salvi
23 August 2008 at 02:43
Sirs,
What does the Supreme Court have to say about granting bail during pendancy of Apeal against conviction. An early respons would be highappreciated.
kumar sachin
23 August 2008 at 00:34
can anyone suggest rulings IN defence for offence u/s 412 IPC URGENTLY
bhuushan bankar
22 August 2008 at 17:15
in the persent case the accused is on bail under sec 279 and 338 can he be discharged or can the complaint be quased since the complainant(not the aggrived person,he was not hurt)is died and the child who got mionr injury is not tracble as he shifted his residence
ankit gupta
20 August 2008 at 22:18
respected sir/mam
do you think the narco,or the bain mapping tests are voilative of article 21 of the indian constitution or not?????
Verma d. Ashish
19 August 2008 at 20:31
Hello
could you provide me with any alternative then??how to save the case as a defendent.
Rekha.....
19 August 2008 at 14:18
Dear Sir/ Mam
I hv asked advise on 08/08/2008 from u for Complaints filled u/s125crpc and IPCu /s498.( Under the Subject Defence for Crpc Sec125 and IPC 498)
With all due respect I asked advise for the complaints filled under sec 125 crpc and 498 of IPC.U advised me to give full details of the facts so I m giving u the facts of the case in nutshell………The applicant stated in her application under 125Crpc that she is legally married wife of the opponent and her marriage performed accourding to Hindu rites on 9/12/2005 and marriage registered at the Registrar office of the Gandevi( name of Taluka) on 13/01/2006.Further She stated that she requested the opponent that she is willing to stay in joint family of the opponent. On 20/1/2006 she accopnied by the opponent to live in Bhanuwilla apartment (the residence of the opponent) at Valsad( District in south Gujarat). The opponent took her at the Hotel named Bhagyoday at Pardi( Taluka ) for a night stay and next day morning responded refused her to take to his residence at valsad and left her alone. The applicant further stated in the said application that when she reached her own at Bhanuwilla apartment (the residence of the opp.) in-laws demanded Rs. 1,00 000=00 from her as dowry and she refused to do so and In-laws physically harassed her and threatened to kill her and pushed her out of the residence and informed her that their son is going to marry NRI girl. The applicant further alleged that in- laws did not return her the photographs and certificate of marriage informing her that it is not with them but it is in Dharampur( taluka). They took her in the car with them to get her marriage certificate from Dharmpur. When they were in the middle of the Dharampur way In-laws stopped the car and pushed her out and abused her and slapped her. The applicant lodged the complaint U/IPC sec.498( C ),323,506(2) and 114 with the Valsad Police Station. As she attempted suicide and lodged the complaint U/IPC Sec 507 in Valsad Railway Police Station as she is residing with her parents in Railway Colony. The Opp. now released on a bail against the complaint of Sec 507.( pending)
All these facts r mentioned in the Application before the Hon’ble Railway JMFC at Surat.
Meanwhile she filed application for interim maintenance and Hon’ble court has allowed Rs.500 till the final judgment of the case.
She has also filed the complaint under Domestic Violence Act 2005 Hon’ble Court at Vapi and the complaint was dismissed on 15/05/2007 and she appealed the said order in the Hon’ble Court of Valsad District And Sessions Judge.( pending)
She has also filed the complaint U/IPC Sec. 229(a) and U/IPC Sec 507 before the Railway JMFC at Surat.( both r pending).
SHE has produced the following documents: 1)list telephone numbers on which threats given to her2)receipt of Hotel Bhagyoday 3)Memorandum of Marriage- in this names of the applicant and opponent are typed but Signatures are not there or not obtained only the Priest’s signature is there or obtained. Even the Signature of Registrar is also not on the form, No photos.
NOW WE have taken the defense in our every reply that the marriage has not at all performed and denied all allegations. Now on 26/08/2008 We hv to crossexamine the Registrar of the Marriage.
V r the group of Juniors Hiren Modi, Rekha Halpati , Neeta Prajapati,Rekha Mehta. Please Sir/Mam guide us in which type of questions V should ask. Please suggest the questions. Thank u very much. Anything more information required pl. inform us.
( The applicant is also a lawyer but now not practicing. She is hving 3 years of experience)
Shree.
19 August 2008 at 12:13
I have a doubt its regarding traffic law
If a person is caught for over speeding and if he don't have money at that particular time to pay the fine is it legally permitted to get the charge sheet from the traffic police and can we pay it in the near by court after some time.
And in the mean time can we have our vehicle with us or the vehicle needs to be handed over to the police till we pay the fine . Could u kindly clarify me regarding this what does our law say with respect to this matter.
vinod bansal
18 August 2008 at 16:32
An order Under section 319 CrPC is An interloctury order or not.Secondlly whether a revision against order under section 319 CrPc lies or not.Plz enlighten Thanks
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
U/s. 375 of IPC; Rape
Whether the term 'rape' is a legal term or medical condition? Suppose, in Gynaecological Report, the Doctor opined that " Rape held two days before" without any reference of injury/laceration/abrasion over the private part of the victim, can be enough for the jury to form an opinion that the offence so-called 'rape' has been held or not.