Anonymous
29 May 2021 at 23:21
Respected Sir,
I have joined a Public Sector Bank as a PO last year. Though I applied as EWS, I got selected as a GENERAL MERIT candidate with final marks higher than GENERAL cut-off.
However, recently my father confessed that he gave wrong details in the EWS application form while procuring the EWS certificate in 2019. Even though my EWS status is genuine, he provided wrong information as he thought the correct information will lead to cancellation of application. Thus the supporting documents don't match the reality back then.
Given my selection under GENERAL merit and genuine EWS status, will I face any criminal case in future if it is revealed? Should I resign?
Any advice will be very helpful.
Sourav Ghosh
28 May 2021 at 19:15
As I left a college after 6months after registration without giving any exam then join another college in the next year to complete my degree should i mentioned it to my attestation form for any govt job?As I have not given any exam in that college
Anonymous
27 May 2021 at 15:21
Fine by police in the police station is under the fine by Court of law ?? Or not? Actually i don't know is spot fine for any petty case does under the fine by court of law or not?..
Anonymous
26 May 2021 at 19:36
If someone is fined of rupees 160 by police for non wearing mask and a gd is registered by his name and he is released in 1-2hours will this effect his government job? Will this record be kept by the police?
And what will he/she can tick in his govt job attestation form where they are asking for
a) Have you ever been arrested ? Yes/No
(b) Have you ever been prosecuted? Yes/No
(c) Have you ever been kept under detention? Yes/No
(d) Have you ever been bound down? Yes/No
(e) Have you ever been fined by a Court of Law? Yes/No
(f) Have you ever been convicted by a Court of law
for any offence ? Yes/No
Please answer
Anonymous
26 May 2021 at 00:22
Accused convicted in trial court. aquitted by sessions court in appeal. Whether second appeal lies to high court or revision. Clarify with judgements if any
We have filed appeal before Madras High Court, but it is returened mentioning justice Anand Venkatesh Judgement
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Reserved on : 04.03.2020
Dated : 28.05.2020
Coram
The Honourable Mr.Justice M.M.SUNDRESH
The Honourable Mr.Justice V.BHARATHIDASAN and
The Honourable Mr. Justice N.ANAND VENKATESH
Criminal Appeal Nos.89 & 90 of 2020 and Criminal Revision Case Nos.494
& 536 of 2019 & Crl.M.P.No.1789, 1794 & 7289 of 2019
stating that appeal does not lie only revision .Hence this query i am asking for any supreme court judgements
I have got madhya pradesh and kerala high court judgements that only appeal should be filed against aquittal
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Parasram Yadav vs Pravin Soni on 6 September, 2019
Author: Sunil Kumar Awasthi
1
High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
Bench at Indore
Criminal Revision No.303/2016
Indore, Dated 06.09.2019
Mr. Vishal Lashkari, learned counsel for the
applicant / complainant.
The applicant has preferred this criminal revision
under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 (herein after referred to as
the Code) against order dated 08.12.2015 passed by
learned 12th Additional Sessions Judge, Indore (MP) in
Criminal Appeal No.589/2015 and Criminal Appeal
No.615/2015, whereby judgment dated 28.07.2015
passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Indore,
District Indore (MP) in Criminal Case No.7893/2010
has been set aside; and the respondent / accused was
convicted for offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
According to the provisions of Section 378 (1) (b) of the Code, the State Government may, in any
case, direct the Public Prosecutor to present an appeal to the High Court from an original or
appellate order of acquittal passed by any Court other than a High Court, or an order of acquittal
passed by the Court of Session in revision. Section 378 (4) of the Code provides that if such an order
of acquittal is passed in any case, instituted upon complaint and the High Court, on an application
made to it by the complainant in this behalf, grants special leave to appeal from the order of
acquittal, the complainant may present such an appeal to the High Court.
In the present matter, the applicant / complainant has not filed any application under Section 378
(4) of the Code for grant of leave to appeal against the judgment of acquittal passed by the Sessions
Court in appeal. Therefore, the present revision application is not maintainable.
Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted two weeks time to argue on the point of
maintainability of the present revision.
Matter be listed after two weeks.
(S.K. Awasthi) Judge rcp
Kerala High Court
Revision vs By Adv. Dr.George Abraham
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/12TH KARTHIKA, 1937
Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2785 of 2011 ( )
---------------------------------
JUDGMENT IN Crl.A 131/2010 OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC-III),
NORTH PARAVUR
JUDGMENT IN CC 872/2006 OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE
COURT- III, ALUVA
REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
---------------------------------------
PAULSON P.VARKEY, S/O.VARKEY
PAINADATH HOUSE, NAYATHODU KARA, ANGAMALY
NAYATHODU PO, PIN 683 572.
BY ADV. DR.GEORGE ABRAHAM
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT/:
------------------------
1. JAISON VARGHESE , S/O.C.J.VARGHESE
CHIRAMEL HOUSE, HOUSE NO.MVTRR 4/30/43/2389
MOOKOOTTIL TEMPLE ROAD, PETTA JUNCTION
POONITHURA P.O.
2. M/S. WEST COAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS
REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER JAISON VARGHESE
CHIRAMEL HOUSE, HOUSE NO.MVTRR 4/30/43/2389
MOOKOOTTIL TEMPLE ROAD, PETTA JUNCTION
POONITHURA P.O., PIN-682 317.
3. STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KERALA. ERNAKULAM.
R1,R2 BY ADV. SRI.V.M.ALI
R BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S.SREEJITH
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
Revision vs By Adv. Dr.George Abraham
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/41008301/ 1
ON 03-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
SCL.
B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J.
-------------------------------------
Crl.R.P. No.2785 of 2011
--------------------------------------
Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2015
ORDER
The revision petitioner is the complainant in C.C.No.872 of 2006 on the files of the Court of the
Judicial Magistrate of First Class-III, Aluva.
2. The accused was convicted by the trial court under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
and sentenced to simple imprisonment for three months and a fine of 5,00,000/-. Against the said
conviction and sentence, the accused filed appeal. As per judgment dated 4.8.2011 in Crl.A.No.131 of
2010, the appellate court acquitted the accused for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act. Aggrieved by the said acquittal of the accused, the complainant before the trial
court has come up with this revision petition.
3. Heard.
4. In view of the provisions of Sub Section 4 of Section 378 of the Code, the remedy of the
complainant in a complaint Crl.R.P. No.2785 of 2011 under Section 138 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act to challenge the order of acquittal passed by the trial court or the appellate court, is
to file appeal before the High Court after obtaining special leave. A Division Bench of this Court in
Omana Jose v. State of Kerala [2014 (2) KLT 504] held that the complainant in a case under Section
138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act cannot challenge the order of acquittal before the Sessions
Court under the proviso to Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and his remedy is only to
file an appeal to the High Court with special leave under Section 378 (4) of the Code of Criminal
Procedure. In view of the above reason, this revision petition is not maintainable.
In the result, this revision petition stands dismissed as not maintainable. Needless to say that this
order will not take away the rights, if any, of the revision petitioner in seeking other remedies
available to him under law.
Sd/-
B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR JUDGE Scl/04.11.2015
Revision vs By Adv. Dr.George Abraham
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/41008301/
Anonymous
25 May 2021 at 12:08
SIR, I HAVE BEEN SELECTED AS A CLERK IN PUNJAB NATONAL BANK. HOWEVER A CASE OF FALSE 498 A IS PENDING AGAINST ME FILED BY WIFE AND FIR WAS ALSO FILED FOR THE SAME. I HAVE NOT BEEN ARRESTED/ DETAINED FOR THE SAME. BUT TOOK ANTICIPATORY BAIL. PRESENTLY CHARGE SHEET IS FILED IN COURT BUT NO HEARING HAS BEEN HELD TILL NOW. IN APPLICATION THERE WAS A QUERY " WHETHER ANY PROSECUTION/ DETENTION/FINE/ CONVICTION/SENTENCE AGAINST YOU HAS BEEN AWARDED BY ANY COURT OF LAW FOR ANY OFFENCE". MY REPLY TO THE SAME WAS " NO" . . HOWEVER DOCUMENT VERIFICATION IS PENDING AND I WILL MENTION THE PENDING CASE STATUS DURING THE DOCUMENT VERIFICATION. MY QUERY IS ,DOES A CASE OF PENDING 498 A IS CAUSE FOR REJECTION OF JOB IN PUBLIC SECTOR BANKS ?
2. IF I AM SELECTED I WILL BE ON PROBATION FOR 06 MONTHS WHICH IS SUBJECT TO SATISFACTORY POLICE VERIFICATION REPORT. SO WHAT ARE MY CHANCES FOR GETTING A SATISFACTORY REPORT FROM POLICE AND FURTHER CONFIRMATION OF BANK SERVICE ? .
Mahesh Jad
25 May 2021 at 09:13
My friend was riding without wearing helmet . He got spot fined rs.500 and police let him go. Will that fine affect him for joining government job and police verification?
Mallesh
21 May 2021 at 11:20
Can some one pl refer a good/famous advocate to deal with a criminal case at tirupati
Anonymous
18 May 2021 at 20:26
Sir, recently I was selected as a government employee through SSC MTS exam.4years back Me and my parents were convicted under ipc290 and 323 sections.Each one paid 700 rupees as fine on the court.total fine amount was 2100.will it have any impact on my job? please let me know ðŸ™ðŸ™
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Police verification
Sir, my friend was riding without wearing helmet, he was caught and police spot fined rs.500 he paid and they let him go. Will that fine affect him for joining government job and police verification report?
And in police attestation form they asked have you ever paid fine under court of law? What should he say - yes or no?