S311 of CrPC - Is it on Oath and can the judge record in writing the statement of witnesses.
I am big time confused. Recently the Hon'ble Session Court in a petition u/s 340 of CrPC for Perjury took action by filing a written complainant against the opposite side.
To clarify, once the judge makes a written complaint, it will send it to First Class Judicial Magistrate for Trial Proceedings.
But before he does that, I want to invoke S311 of CrPC and examine witnesses on Oath. I am not sure if S311 permits recording of statement of witnesses on Oath and that's my first question.
If suppose the above question is answered in negative, then I plan to invoke S311 read with S202 or 200 of CrPC to get the statements of witnesses recorded on Oath.
Eventually my goal is to get this witnesses examined before the court and get their statements recorded on Oath so that they are binded with those statements.
Please advice
Yesterday i went to my friend house at koyambedu Chennai, my house is at thirumullaivoyal. "Blink It App" staffs came to my friend house and told they are giving offer discount for downloading the app. They also asked me to download the blinkit app. They guaranteed product delivery in 10 minutes. I told them that i will download the app only if they have service at thirumullaivoyal. They told services are available at thirumullaivoyal. So i downloaded the app. They told they give Rs. 50 off on purchase of minimum Rs. 200. They told they will deliver within 10 min. I ordered and got the product at my friend house at koyambedu. Today i came to my house at thirumullaivoyal and tried the app. Its showing services unavailable in thirumullaivoyal. I m cheated by the blinkit staff. How should i take legal action on blinkit company. Thank you.
Respected Experts,
A partnership firm issued a cheque in the name of the firm, with one person signing it. However, the account associated with the cheque was jointly opened by the firm. Due to the absence of the second signature, the cheque was dishonored. Can I file a Section 138 case against both the partnership firm and the individual who signed the cheque?
Notice u/s 138 of NI Act is issued to co., only. There is no single word of that, it is represented by Managing Director. Complaint is also filed same. In my opinion complaint is not maintainable without directors are parties
Kindly reply me and if any citations please let me know.
I need a clarification on a cheque bounce case.
I have sent around 15 lakh to my friend for his business purpose by taking a loan on my name . He started paying the emi regularly by sending the emi amount to me for an year. The emi was sent to me by his wife, mother and from his business and personal account. After an year he stopped paying the EMI. He stopped to respond my phone calls and his parents were also refused to pay the emi back.
I have raised a police complaint in our local police station. After the complaint my opponent gave me two cheques of 5 lakhs.
Then he stopped the payment and my both of the cheque got bounced. Now he raised a complaint to the police superiors that the local police inspector and DSP have threatened him to get the cheque from him.
But that is not the truth. As I have done the transaction through netbanking, he was not able to prove he didn’t receive any money from me. So that he gave us the cheque.
Now I have sent the legal notice twice as per the process. I received a reply that he was threatened by police to lend me the cheque. So this will not be under 138 NIA.
Now we have the
1. Bank statement which points the transferred amount of 15 lakhs,
2. Cheque and the return memo
3. Acknowledgment for the notice sent to the opponent.
Now pls let me know if there are any chances that the opponent can prove him as innocent.
And let me know the chances of winning the case.
My wife does not want to give birth to the child at the age of 38 just because I am into business, not job. Not only that, she does not want to come along with me to chandigarh (me and my parents are planning to settle down in chandigarh. instead, she wants to live alone in 1bhk flat in Delhi only to carry on her job. Furthermore, she does not give respect to my parents and me. She is too much egoistic and never ever contribute financially. I want baby in my life and want her to give respect to me and my parents. What should I do now. Whenever I try to request her to move with us to chandigarh she gets frustrated and call her parents who give threats to me that she is epileptic so do not do this and that with her as she would take tension which could trigger problem. I am in depression what should I do now I do not want to leave my parents and my hometown chandigarh.
I contacted a person works in Shriram Finance for Loan. He came to My home and told Due to Low cibil Loan from Shriram Fin not Possible but he can make sure that I will get Loan from some Other Company. He Bring a guy with Himself and Told that he is employee of HDFC and taking Gurantee that I will get Loan and for That I have to trasfer 21000INR as login Fee If Not so he will refund all my money. I trasferred amount to Shriram FIn Employee Through Google Pay. They also Told that They will take 5 percent from the loan amount which will go to Seniors.
after Few days they Both called and Told that Seniors asking for 14 percent and they will take it before Disbursment of loan tharough Cheque.
and The company Name is Namdev Fin PVT LTD.
In this process I come to know that The new guy is not from HDFC. and told lies. Now I want my 21000 fee Refund. what should I do? They are agree to refund But they are giving dates to dates.
Where to compalin and what to complain? first Guy is from Shriram Finance. shud I complain to shriram Fin too? Can I complain in Cyber department too on line complain? it was a home loan. in The name of My moner and applicant was my mother in this loan. Kindly Guide.
Thank You
Quashing of fir and filing issues
I have filed a petition before the HIgh court for quashing. However there were 3 pages which were a bit blur and i dont have additional copies of the same.
This 3 were the screenshot of messages filed with the chargesheet and the one in chargesheet is itself blur
Please suggest, the best course of action.
Can i just remove those which are a part of chargesheet as its not really relevant for determining the ingredients of offence