RAM
01 September 2008 at 11:26
I am a public servant working for HPCL. I have been convicted in a case filed under Sec. 407 and 420 IPC. The case is udner appeal stage before a sessions judge. I am apprehensive about the judgement and wish to compund the case. Fortunately HPCL (Public Sector Undertaking) management is ready to compuind the case. As per prosecution charge sheet, HPCL is the party in respect of whom offences under the above section were committed. In this regard, i need your opinion on the following issues:
1. Under Sec 407 IPC, there is a maximum limit of Rs 250 (amount involved. In the entire case of prosecition, there was no mention of the amount involved in the crime. In such case who will decide the amount of money misappropriated ?
2. Who can compound on behalf of HPCL.
3. Can you brief about the procedure for compunding ? Please give some citations/judgements on the compounding at the appeal stage of the case.
ankit gupta
31 August 2008 at 23:21
can any layman ask a police officer to show his identity card before allowing him to inspect in any ways.
if yes then what a layman can do if the police officer denies for the same.
please also menation by which act or section this kind of power is conferred upon general people.
regards
ankit gupta
31 August 2008 at 23:16
can anyone give me the meaning of evidence and its relation with other substantive and procedural laws in form of quotations under the english law or as quoted by the supreme court.
please provide in context to the latest information.
regards
vinod bansal
31 August 2008 at 14:44
Sir
A case u/ss 363/366A/376/120-B IPC was registered and accused was arrested And prosecutrix who is about 12 years old was also recoverd from the possesion of accused.Both were produced before magistrate,accused sent in judicial custody and prosecutrix requested the court to sent her with parents of accused as they (Accused & prosecutrix) had performed marriage in a temple on the other side parents of prosecutrix requested the court to hand over the custody of their minor girl i.e.12 years (prosecutrix) .Now question is Who is that who is legally entited of custody of girl(prosecutrix)Plz Advice soon as case is fixed for 1-9-08
sanjay kumar patibandla
31 August 2008 at 08:20
Sir, Wife clearly admitted that entire harassment was taken place at her matrimonial house which is not with in the jurisdiction of present trail court. She filed a case where she is residing now.
Please know me the case laws regarding jurisdiction.
Anil Kumar kamboj Delhi M-9650
30 August 2008 at 13:59
when a chargsheet wasnot filed within the sixty days,the accused became entitled to right to release on bail,but his appliction for bail erroneously rejected by the magistrate. He apporeched the higer authority. And meanwhile a charge sheet was filed .
Right to bail whether extinguished.
SANJAY DIXIT
29 August 2008 at 23:41
I given a sum of Rs 2 lacs as a token amount for purchase of a house & get a paid receipt of said amount on revenue stamp signed.No agreement was executed. Later it come to know that the said property was disposed off to some other person. I demanded back the money, he given a A/c payee cheque of Rs 2 lac after a great time spoil. Cheque dishonoured. On consultation he paid cash of Rs 1 lac 20 Thousands in total in instalments till today.
He is not paying the balance now.
1) What should I do now?
2) whether the part payment will efect the case U/s 138 NIAct, if I produce the cheque again (as nearly 45 days over of bouncing the cheque)and give him a notice U/s 138 NIAct?
3) If no how may I send a Notice for dishonour of Cheque for whole amount, when I received already a part of it.
Pls suggest.
sundara kadeswaran
29 August 2008 at 12:50
Under which G.O. or Amendment First class and second class is abolished in tamilnadu?
sundara kadeswaran
29 August 2008 at 12:48
Is state government empowered to amend CrPC,if so which provision allows it to amend?
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
withdrawing the complainant.
I filed two cases u/s 138 of N I Act cases againast one person. The matter is settled before giving sworn affidavit.
Now we want to withdraw the cases. Is the petition u/s 257 of Cr.P C is maintanable to with draw case before taking considaration. if no what is the procedure to withdraw the complaints.