LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

KANDE VENKATESH GUPTA   08 August 2008 at 18:13

what is cruelty

Whether insistence made by the husband to his wife to file a suit for partition of her parental joint family property amounts to cruelty within the meaning of S.498-A of I.P.C.?

KANDE VENKATESH GUPTA   08 August 2008 at 18:13

what is cruelty

Whether insistence made by the husband to his wife to file a suit for partition of her parental joint family property amounts to cruelty within the meaning of S.498-A of I.P.C.?

bhagwant   08 August 2008 at 16:10

Motor Vehicle Accident

One Tractor with trouly was wrongly parked without parking light or any signal on side of road.
One motor cyclist gave forceful dash to trolly and he himself and pillon rider died on spot.
Offence under which section will be filled against accused, under what section Tractor owner will be charged.
Whether two seperate offences are to be filled, or single.

advocate satya   08 August 2008 at 13:10

electricity theft

sir
the electric meter of one of the consumer got burnt, he reported to the local office , the local office has removed the seal and taken with them, they have connected the line directly,provided the complaint slip to the consumer, after lapse of seven days some enforcement person came to the house and taken photograph of the house, the consumer again contected the area office and then he had been informed that a seperate complaint for change of meter is required at regional office then the meter will be changed ,
now my question is
1when the electrician of the electric company himself had connected the line directly is the customer is been held liable?
2the electric company visit of enforcement cell smell some foul play and do they are planning to lodge case of theft?
3what the consumer should take precautions to protect him?

Tarun Kalra LL.M, M.B.A   07 August 2008 at 17:39

self cheque

hello sir,

what is the liability of a person who is drawing amount by a self cheque from anothers account, by ACCOUNT HOLDERS signatures on the front and back side of the cheque regarding payment of amount that he reiceived, for example there are two persons,A and B, A(employee) signs a cheque against his salary account AND the manager(B) of the school, FILLS IT(who is employer and paying authority)AND A SIGNS in the front and back side of the self cheque,(self cheque is filled by B, but signed by A i.e account holder FOR PAST MANY YEARS) and B fills the cheque for past many years and recieved the amount and paid it to A, now there is dispute between A and b on any matter, now can A say that B misused his money,(BUT ITS GOING FOR PAST 9 YEARS AND A NEVER COMPLAINTED BEFORE AS HE SIGHNS AND GIVES IT TO B FOR RECIEVE PAYMENT) or B cheated with him, or not pay money to him(as the cheque is filled by B, but signed by A in front and back side of cheque) what is the criminal, or civil libilty of B,(as he widraw money by A,s signatures from A,s account but the cheque is originally sined by A in front and back of cheque and its a SELF CHEQUE)

Priti Bakalkar   07 August 2008 at 15:17

Plea Bargaining

Is the amendment to Cr. P. C. in respect of Plea Bargaining has come in force in India? If so, can you suggest the case law on the said subject.
Tx.

advocate satya   07 August 2008 at 13:26

N.I.ACT sec 138

sir
if anyone takes a loan from any bank in delhi and if any cheque of EMI bounces or the person who had taken the loan is not repaying can the bank can lodge a case outside delhi on the pretext that the branch office or the head office is there so they can file the complaint there, is it not harrasment of consumer to face the trial in another city , moreover is there any judgement in relevance to this ?

punit   06 August 2008 at 16:01

N.I. ACT U/S 138

SIR,
PLZ SEND ME A JUDGEMENTS ON CHQUE BOUNCE CASE I WANT TO RESTORE MY PETITION FROM HIGH COURT. MY CASE WAS DISMISSED BY ACJM COURT FOR NON PRASENTS OF ADVOCATE AND ALSO COMPLAINTENT

PURSHOTAM BEHL   06 August 2008 at 08:10

QUASHING AN FIR

DVB HAD BOOKED AN FIR AGAINST ME IN THEFT OF ELECTRICITY , BUT THE DISTT. CONSUMER HAD WAVED THEIR DEMAND , BUT P.H. COURT REFUSES TO ACCEPT THIS ORDER , AND NEEDS QUASHING ORDERS FROM H.C.

vinod bansal   05 August 2008 at 22:07

138 NI Act

Sir
I filed crl complaint us 138 Of NI Act After 6 days of end of Limitation period,now magistrate is requiring from me any authority for delay condon in this situation,plz provide me any authoritry of High Court or Supreme Court for delay condon in this matter.Thanku