VNSR Krishna
04 June 2009 at 23:08
I wanted to know, within how many years can a case be reopened which has been closed on a false pretext that the person who has committed suicide was mentally not stable?
If it can be opened after more than a decade, what can be the grounds for reopening of such a case?
sampat singh
04 June 2009 at 14:29
Procutrix was alleged that accused come in my room at night 2'0 clock. he swith on light and caught my Hand. then I shout the accused run away.
Please tell me IPC section 354 and 451 was made out or not?
PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
04 June 2009 at 00:08
pls provide full information with example of contradiction,omission and addition
thanks to all learned in advance
Gopal Krishna Behera
03 June 2009 at 07:00
Sir,
Can a supplimentary/additional statement of an accused be recorded under Section 313 Cr.P.C.?
Thanking you..
With best regards...
Gopal.
PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
01 June 2009 at 23:05
hello all experts
what are generally written on the packing of the mudamal by the police pls inform
Ranganath
01 June 2009 at 14:47
Ld counsels,
Anticipatory bail was ordered by high court. In the bail order it is mentioend that "the case of prosecution is that the accsued have ill-treated and demanded dowry, and the govt advocate submits that petition enquiry is pending after which there is a possibility of registering a case." With the above observation bail was ordered. Now, in this situation the complaint alleges cheating apart from dowry deamnd. Why is the prosecution didnt mention cheating while the bail petition was heard.
The truth is the complaint on the record of police and the public prosecutor was tampered to add cheating. Further no FIR was registered based on this complaint.
A new complaint was later accepted and FIR is regsitered u/s 420.
Now since the records are all the same with cheating allegations in the complaint copies will the court percieve the foul play.
Please give your opinion. Please remember we are living in a corrupt country and any thing can be done by bribing the police and court staff. My question why is the prosecution didnt mention about cheating while it was clearly mentioned in the (forged)complaint. Will the Hbl high court condone this as a technical err and brush aside as the petition enquiry was pending. This will be disastrous given that no FIR was later filed based on this first complaint.
What is the legal remedy that I have to order an enquiry on this forgery/conspiracy, obtain stay on the proceedings, and extend the bail for the second complaint. I want to directly approach the court, is that advisable.
This is a clear case where the court is being mis-led provided if I get the copy of the original complaint which I cant.
Please clarify.
PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
31 May 2009 at 01:34
hello all leartned experts
what is the degault bail pls inform me
PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
31 May 2009 at 01:32
hello all leartned experts
what is the degault bail pls inform me
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Jurisdiction of Section 138 of NI Act
Dear Friends,
Can you explain jurisdiction of Section 138 of N.I.Act, or any latest case law / guidelines regarding the same