sampat singh
08 June 2009 at 16:05
Procutrix says I was sleeping in my room with open door & my mother was also sleeping in other room with open door. the Accused come with his brother in law (SAALA)at night at 2'o clock. he swith on the light & caught hold my palm(Hand). the Saala was stand out side of my room.then I shouted the Accuesed and his saala run away.
plz tell me IPC sec. 354 & 451 are committed here or not? A lawyser tell me Ipc section 451 is not commited here Because IPC sec 451 are belong to where the accused enterd in the open place.there are no roof on the wall like chowk.is it true? if IPC sec 451 is not effected here when which section effected here? tell me also what defence should taken by accused? I want to send you this case history
M.S.Chandra Shekar
08 June 2009 at 12:19
I hava prima facie evidence against the Registration Department false deposition on a Exhibit in a Suit for Partition (Civil Dispute) in which I am the Defendant and the suit was decreed against me due to the False evidence given by the Registration Department.
After 20 years I got a prima facie evidence when the Registration Department failed to contest the same exhibit in the Hon'ble High Court, the order of the High court was given in my favour
Now I have moved a 340 CrPc Petition in the Civil Court where the Suit was decreed against me.
Now my question is that whether I have to obtain a permission from the state government to prosecute the Sub Registrar / District Registrar against whom the Petition is made ? / or the 340 Cr Pc application will be sufficient?
Please help.
anckoora
07 June 2009 at 15:16
dear sir,
(1)out of personal loan of 1.60lacs, i repaid 60000/- from mar 09 onwards i am unable to repay & my EMI (thro' ECS) is bounced since april 09.Due to financial crisi, I shifted to another state in end feb 09 and didn't inform the bank from whom i took the loan.
(2) also i am having creidt card outstanding dues of 1 lac (card of another bank)which i am not paying since mar 09 due to same situation.
still for about next 3 months i will not bale to repay them.
my question is :(a)in above scenario, what both banks will take actions against me and how ? (b) according to you, what should i do if i don't want to face legal action ?
thanks in advance
regards
anckoor
P.S.Subbaraman
07 June 2009 at 12:58
In a cheque dishonour case, Though the same is tried before the Judicial Magistrate through legal fiction.Sometimes amendment application are required to be filed as to amend the complaint . Is there any specific provision under the Criminal Procedure Code or any cited case laws ?
dkshankar
07 June 2009 at 12:55
One "X" borrowed a sum of Rs. 5,00,000/- from One "A" and deposited his documents of title. Later when "A" demanded payment for the debt "X" gave a cheque for Rs.5,50,000/- towards full satisfaction of the debt. When the cheque was presented for collection it was returned with an endorsement that "In sufficient Funds". Mr. "A" sent a statutory notice under Section 138 of N.I.Act demanding payment. "X" received the notice and sent a reply that he did not borrow the money he gave the documents to his relative "Y" for his bank loan and MR. "A" got the document from "Y" using rowdy elements, and now used the documents and cheque to unlawfully enrich, and "X" does not has a account in the bank and the cheque issued is not his Account. "X"'s relative "Y" is also one of the debtors to Mr."A". "Y" and his father one year back sent a letter admitting that Y borrowed the debt and debt of "X" also. "A" has sent a notice to the "X"'s bank that the chueque was returned for the reasons insufficent funds and not as signature differs? but x states that it is not his A/c. Bank sent a reply that the Account is a Company cheque and "Y" is the authorised person issuing the cheque. It is Now clear that both "X" and "Y" inorder to avoid their liablity "X" issued "Y's" cheque by puting "X" signature to cheated Mr."A". In the mean time 30 days lapsed and now shall i file a complaint against "X" eventhough the cheque was belong to "Y" A/c or file a cheating case under Sec 420 I.P.C against both X and Y. Advice me in this regard.
vinod bansal
07 June 2009 at 10:36
R/members
A complaint made before police us 395(robbery)/323/506 ipc etc. by me but police didnot initiate any action against culprits those were named in complaint ,thereafter i filed a crl complaint us 395(robbery)/323/506 ipc etc. before magistrate & magistrate has recorded preliminary evidence in this complaint case i stated names of all culprits in my evidence ,now i want to know what will be the fate of allegation of the robbery as now the case is pending before the magistrate thats why recovery could not be effected of my looted articles, in the absence of recovery court can summon/punish the culprit or not.Thanks
A Truthseeker
06 June 2009 at 20:45
checking or preventing dowry is a herculean task. however the human instinct not to practise falsehood before court of law or a superior authority may be utilised for this purpose. can swearing in affidavits by either paries at the time of marriage that neither party took or gave dowry mitigate this menace?
Sanjay. Tezad
06 June 2009 at 14:04
whether the offence u/s 133 of peoples reprentative act are cognizable and police can file charge sheet the accussed under the same.
dewakar
06 June 2009 at 13:57
if a person is freed from the charge of 307 and if in the evidence the prosecutor failed to proov the serologist who examined the weapon of offence, in that case wheather the accused be aquitted from 4/25 arms act?
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Section 494 & 498 of crpc
my first wife has filed case of 494 & 498 of crpc act and i out for bail, case is going on in the couurt.Am i elegible for 2nd marriage if divorce case is not filed and case result is not yet given. please suggest.