Vikas Aggarwal
18 December 2008 at 01:19
Magistrate Issued process of summons u/s 204 cr.pc in private complaint u/s 323, 324, 506 Ipc. section 324, 506 non bailable and 506 is not bailable in haryana. Should i file a anticipatry bail of accused or get a regular bail. Can court remand the accused to judicial / police custody.
Vikram Chandra
17 December 2008 at 18:13
Dear Sirs,
The accused on the fast date of appearance reported before the court that he will pay the cheque amount by the next date of posting and accordingly he got the Demand Draft worth the cheque amount as per the case of the complainant. But the complainant is not willing to take the amount. Eventhough a memo was filed before the magistrate to close the case as the amount is being paid by the accused the court is not closing. What steps the accused can take now to close the case?
regards,
vikram.
vinod bansal
16 December 2008 at 20:31
Sir
wheather a wife who got divorce from her husband u/s 13 of HMAct than again marry him in a temple by exchanging garlands without performing sapatpadi is covered by the defination of wife for the purpose of 304-B IPC.
SATYA PRAKASH
16 December 2008 at 12:21
give me jurdiction of punishment arrest by police in moral traffic act if girl is unmarried
SATYA PRAKASH
16 December 2008 at 12:20
give me jurdiction of punishment arrest by police in moral traffic act if girl is unmarried
IKGoyal Advocate
16 December 2008 at 05:54
I want to get pdf format of the books on the subject mentioned above. -IKGoyal
Pradip Kumar Nandy
15 December 2008 at 15:55
Hostile witness stated before court that I stated to police during investigation that Murki Mal committed murder Pravas Mallick. Is this substanctive evidence?
If admissible In evdence Judge can act on the same? If answer yes Please site the rullings.
Chandra sekhar
15 December 2008 at 09:38
Dear All,
The facts of the case are as under. I am for the accused. The accused and the complainants are family friends for over 3 decades. The complainant had sold a property to the accused and executed a registered sale deed. As a part of the sale consideration the accused has issued a Cheque for Rs 65000/- and mentioned clearly in the sale deed. The accused maintained sufficient balance into his bank account as on the date of issue of the Cheque. Immediately the next day after the sale transaction the accused went to the property and found that there are third party claimants on this property and well as that of Governments claim on this property and civil litigations were there much before the sale transaction took place. The District Collector, Thasildhar and other Government Officials have imposed ban on the sale of this property much before the sale transaction took place. But the complainant purchased the property with different survey numbers and after coming to know the problems he has cleverly sold the property to the accused who is his friend. By then the accused has paid huge amount to the complainant except the mentioned Cheque amount. The accused has informed not to present the Cheque. The complainant has assured to solve the problems and has done nothing and presented the for collection as the time of the Cheque was getting lapsed at the end of 6 months. The Cheque bounced. Cheque bounce case and a civil case for cancellation of the sale deed was filed by the complainant.. After some time the Complainant got amended the civil case for recovery of the balance sale consideration in the event of the sale deed cannot be cancelled. The Civil case was won by us and pending at the High Court
The Accused got the land survey done by the Thasildar office to prove that the survey numbers mentioned are wrong and also procured more than 30 documents to prove the land has several claims and Govt. Claims. The Concerned Deputy Collector was summoned to the court by the accused and he has clearly stated in his chief and Cross examination that the property belongs to the Government.
The complainant has filed only a certified copy of the Cheque in the Criminal Court.
I request members to provide and useful information and High court or S.C. judgments favorable to the accused.
Thank you
V.G.Rao Advocate
12 December 2008 at 20:28
Hi all,
I need a case law regarding that, mere pendency of one or two cases u/sec 138 of N.I Act filed by complainant he cannot be treated as a Professional Money lender. (I am a complainant side advocate) Please its urgent.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Food adultration act
dear Friends,
I have applied for the re-analysis of a food sample from the central food laboratory (PFA Act)wherefrom it passed the test. Now the trial court is not dismissing the case and is asking for judgments of court even after making the court clear regarding the provisions of 203 & 227 CrPC. Pls suggest.
Thanks & Rgds.