Alex Thannippilly
08 November 2020 at 12:06
sir
accused borrowed an amount of Rs 1 lakh from the complainant as introduced by PW3 Complainant's witness.But the complainant filled the cheque for Rs 5 lakh and on dishonour of cheque filed case against accused for 5 lakhs, and complainant and PW3 gave evidence in support of that But the audio conversation record between the accused and PW3 produced and marked by the accused before the court shows that PW3 admit that only 1 lakh was given to the accused.What will be result?
Anonymous
08 November 2020 at 12:04
Dear Sir, I was a student in some university and university filled a criminal case on me and some other student with some section like 341, 332, 353, etc now that case has taken back (withdrawn) by state govt. In 2017. So does I will face any problem at the time of appointment of govt. Job or not at all. Edit - taken back means withdrawal.
No order were given by court against me as the case was withdrawn by state govt. In 2017
Alex Thannippilly
08 November 2020 at 12:01
sir
accused borrowed an amount of Rs 1 lakh from the complainant as introduced by PW3 Complainant's witness.But the complainant filled the cheque for Rs 5 lakh and on dishonour of cheque filed case against accused for 5 lakhs, and complainant and PW3 gave evidence in support of that But the audio conversation record between the accused and PW3 produced and marked by the accused before the court shows that PW3 admit that only 1 lakh was given to the accused.What will be result?
Anonymous
08 November 2020 at 04:58
Dear Sir, I was a student in some university and university filled a criminal case on me and some other student with some section like 341, 332, 353, etc now that case has been taken back (withdrawn) by state govt. In 2017. So does I will face any problem at the time of appointment of govt. Job or not at all.
Edit - taken back means withdrawn.
P K George
05 November 2020 at 22:05
Does a Partner of LLP can be liable for the dishonour of Cheque as same as the Designated Partner.
Ram
05 November 2020 at 09:40
Dear Respected Experts,
Case History in Brief:
Anitha given a CheQue to house owner Kannan for house rental advance. The cheque was Anitha’s mother bank account. House owner Kannan withdrew the amount. After two years Anitha vacated Kanan’s house. Kannan told Anitha that he given the Amount to his Brother Krishnan because both Kannan & Krishnan partitioned their property. Now the property belongs to Krishnan. Krishnan also ensured Anitha that he will give the amount in 3 month’s time. After 3 months Krishnan given a Cheque to Anitha. When Anitha deposited Krishnan’s cheque, it bounced back due to “insufficient fund”. Now the petitioner is Anitha.
Anitha filed a Complaint u/s Negotiable Instrument Act 138 for Cheque bounce Case.
My Question:
1. Can Complainant-Anitha call Kannan as witness u/s 311 CrPc in cheque bounce case?
2. Can Complainant-Anitha Call her mother as witness u/s 311 CrPc to prove that her mother given the Cheque
to her daughter Anitha for rental Advance?
Thanks in Advance
Anonymous
04 November 2020 at 16:40
There was a married man having 2 kids whose wife passed away.
Through mutual friends he contacted me to marry him
I denied to marry him but he asked me to a good friend with him.
When seeing his situation I agreed to marry him
He physically abused me saying that in future he will marry me.
Now when he used me several times he is denying to get married and mentally harassing me to leave him.
I m suffering from a mental trauma due to it that he used me
Ram
03 November 2020 at 01:53
Dear Experts,
I had rented a shop for which I paid rs.2 Lakhs Advance. After I vocated the Shop the owner asked me time to return my Shop Advance amount. But it is almost 4 years have gone. He did not pay the Shop Advance amount. I made a police complaint. Police enquired and asked the owner to give a ChQ worth rs.2 Lakh. The ChQ is bouncing due to insufficient money. I filed ChQ bource case. He did not attend Court. Finally Court passed Ex-Parte Order.
My Question:
1) Can I ask Court to attach his property? I have taken EC & His House document through sub-registrar office.
2) If not, Is there any other way I can get my shop advance Back?
Thanks In Advance
Ram
Madhu Mittal
02 November 2020 at 11:45
Summon u/s 138 N I Act is given by Dasti in two copies by court to complainant . One copy is sent to Address of Accused by Rgd post AD. On the date of court hearing other copy of summon with postal receipt of Regd post AD is handed over to trial court, thus summon is deemed to have been served.
Now Bailable Warrant is issued and given Dasti to Complainant. Now my humble query is that Whether the said Bailable Warrant be sent by Rgd post AD to concerning Police station to be executed and the photocopy of said Bailable Warrant along with Rgd post AD receipt be handed over to trial court as proof of sending Dasti to Concerning police station. Otherwise if trial Court ask where is Bailable/Arrest warrant given Dasti, complainant has no answer. Is there any illegality in it, because a policeman gave confusion to us by telling that Bailable Warrant as well as Arrest Warrant Can not be copied and photocopy of said can not be given to court alongwith regd postal receipt, it is some type of offence.
This is required as in general, whenever a Bailable/Arrest warrant is issued, if not taken Dasti, it is hand over to policeman without taking any receipt thereof, and if it does not returned back either executed or non-executed, no follow up action is taken by court, and simply issue another Bailable/Arrest Warrant,and keep on doing so. By taking Dasti, and sending to concerning Police Station by Regd post,at least it is proved that bailable warrant has been posted at least concerning Police Station.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Hunger strike
I want to go for hunger strike against police department since favouring the accused and not filing charge sheet. Do I need to take permission from police to go for hunger strike and what section applies.