Sir,
My friends mom who is a widow (Muslim), her husband expired in the month of Jan 2017. Her deceased husband had 3 sons from his first wife wherein 2 sons expired. The surviving son has filed Testamentary Petition in the High Court of Bombay for the letter of administration of the deceased property without including the widow as legal heir of the deceased. The 3 flats which were clubbed to 1 are in the name of his Grand-Daughter (1 Flat) and his former wife and deceased husband (2 Flats). The surviving widow is on the verge of intervening in the Court matters filed by the deceased husband and even filing Caveat in the Testamentary Petition.
Can anyone disposes her from the flats?
What legal remedy can be adapted in order to safe-guard the property and herself?
Regards,
Mohammed Shaikh
Sir,.
I need ur help in related to excution case 128 of crpc . That an 128 crpc is not maintainable after one year.
If any one have the filling kind send me
My wife is living to her maternals for last app 2 months. I sent a legal notice to her this month to ask her to come back. She filed a false police complaint over it instead of replying.
Can police take me to custody if I visit to police station for this matter to put my views?
After accumulating each of the asset movable and immovable we have to give the inventory of assets and liabilities.
Please let us know how it is done and should we once again hire an advocate to handover the same to the court?
Should we give a mutual consent statement of having divided the assets after paying off all the liabilities?
Pl advise.
Thanks,
Rama Iyer
After accumulating each of the asset movable and immovable we have to give the inventory of assets and liabilities.
Please let us know how it is done and should we once again hire an advocate to handover the same to the court?
Should we give a mutual consent statement of having divided the assets after paying off all the liabilities?
Pl advise.
Thanks,
Rama Iyer
Respected seniors I am married women but from last 4yrs staying in parents house and husband is in his place filled maintaince case Us 125 then twicly filled execution for maintenance ordered passes for intremee maintenance Rs 5000 in December 2015 bit never paid but finally 1month ago he paid 10000 now he wants me back in his home..
He is trying for the same called me try to change my thoughts .
So please help me to understand his motto as u all deal with such Thngs entire day was he really wants me back or just for sake of money he is doing so...
And if anyone suggest me to go back then what is actual procedure regarding that and law related stuff pls help me.
Dear Sir,
good morning
I have approached court for divorce and custody of the child, wife has filed for MC u/s 125 crpc (after divorce petition) but she has never appeared in court MC process and court has issued NFT which is going to happen next monday. In her MC application she has mentioned that she is unemployed but in fact she is working somewhere but i am not sure whether she got the job before or after filing the MC. so far there is no order for Interim maintenance but am paying for the child.
I have filed counter in MC stating she is employed somewhere.(I do not have documents to prove this but sure she is working) and a copy of the MC she has filed before in High Court to transfer divorce /custody petition . she did not even produce high court order before family court to move files to court near to her residence , finally i have done that . is this a contempt of court ?
I would like to pursue the case against her , though her MC may get rejected if she do not turn in the next hearing.
under the above circumstances may I request your feedback on my queries please
1. when the court rejects MC due to other party absence, does that mean my argument -my counter is accepted by the court , can I base that to apply for further legal action
like defamation /or what other case can be filed against her for lying and mentally torturing me and my mother by stating false charges,
2. Do I have opportunity to State before court in next hearing(NFT ) that she is working somewhere and required further examine ?/ asking her bank statement as proof for fund transfer from my side.(paying for the child now too) she has claimed i have not paid anything.(does this apply if she do not appear ? )
3. If her MC gets rejected due to her absence do I have still scope for perjury against her ( but I do not know when she has got job but sure when high court order came she has job.)
4. is perjury is applicable only to her or also against her relatives for conspiring to state false things to get undue advantage.
5. If i gets her employment details before next hearing which is NFT , can I submit the same on the same day of hearing stating perjury (if at all )
if i gets after court dismissing the MC, can I still produce the document and request for perjury ?
7. any other suitable remedy under the law to prevent such kind people harassing people like me
8. Can I seek information from her employer about her employment status , after MC gets rejected is there any legal issue in that.
Dear Lawyers,
Please provide me your feedback in this case. I have got interim bail from Sessions court. Do reply me with your comments. Please find below mentioned Order passed by the Hon'ble Sessions Judge
Regards,
Sam
ORDER BELOW EXH. 3 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL
APPLICATION NO. 1283 /2017.
1. Perused application.
Heard Ld. counsel Shri. J.A. Azmi, for applicants.
2. Ld. counsel for the applicants submitted that applicant no. 1 is husband of complainant Shilpa, whereas applicant no.2 and 3 are close relatives
of accused no. 1 Somu Anand Ramteke. Marriage between applicant no. 1 and complainant was solemnized on 20th June, 2012. After marriage, she came to the house of her husband for cohabitation at Mira Road.
It is alleged by the prosecution that accused in furtherance of their common intention, subjected her to cruelty, beaten her, abused and threatened her. Complainant was never illtreated, but after about 8 months of the marriage, she was left to her parent's house at Sakoli, Dist. Bhandara. Though several attempts were made to bring
her back, she did not turn to her matrimonial house.
3. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, nothing is to be recovered from the applicants. Hence, in my view, custodial interrogation of applicants is not necessary and interim protection can be granted. Hence, the order.
ORDER
1] In the event of arrest of applicants namely Somu Anand Ramteke, Sumedh Anand Ramteke and Smt. Jyoti Anand Ramteke, they be released on P.R. bond of Rs.20,000/each with one or two solvent sureties in the like amount each in C.R. No. I of 218 of 2017, Kashimira police station, for the offences
punishable under section 498A, 323, 504, 506 of I.P.C., on following conditions.
a) The applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required.
b) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.
c) The applicants shall not leave Konkan region without the previous permission of the Court.
d) The applicants shall not commit any other offence or similar offence.
2] Issue showcause notice why adinterim
anticipatory bail should not be confirmed. R/o. 25.05.2017.
Date: 17.05.2017.
(A.S. Bhaisare)
Additional Sessions Judge 3,
Thane.
Father of my grandfather has some property. My grandfather has 2 daughters and 5 sons in which one daughter was elder then all and the other daughter is younger then all. First daughter got married before N.T.R rule came and last got married after 3 months N. T. R rule came. Do they get property share?
Casr filed by husband u/s 13(1)b) of hindu act
Hi sir,
I am wife and currently my husbad filed case agaist me under saction 13(1)(b) .
We got married as on 28/05/2010.
And after some fight at home . During my brother marriage they told to stay for one month and after that they will take back. But in function of my marriage they do not come .
And as he is my father shop licences my father think that they will not take back his girl and also not leave shop so my father decided to keep one meeting and in that they decided to get back shop and my husband family decided that at time of back of shop divorce need to be done . As they want to end all relationship
But as I am not ready to give divorce I not given this all done around dec 2011.
After that in july 2012 I have filed case u/s 9 of hindu act . In reply that my husband filed case u/s 13(1)(a).
But this case get dismissed in 2015 .
Order bot in any one favour.
I just want to know what is my negative point in case
And what plus point in my case
As I do not want to give divorce.
I want to give one chance to my marriage but my husband under eco that he do not want to give any chance.
Also he his telling one point that you have not tried any time to reconcile.
But I just want to say I want to save my marriage .