LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Dr. Harrit Jani   05 October 2008 at 13:08

intrim mainantance section 125

Hello ,
Regards,
I have just studied the case study posted by of Savitri, I have a Query : What in case :(1) Husband and wife had no merital relationship from the very 4th day of marriage, (2) Wife went away with her parrents and other family members taking away allmost all the house hold, appliances, cash, and others in absence of her husband. after three years of marriage, even without informing her husband in either way. (3) The husband became the victim of heart desease and spinal cord desease as well depression under such physical condition was not able to work and earn so lost the job. (3) now still for last five years husband has no income source and totally dependant on his parrents who are again a middle class family and retired father(no pension or any other income)mother is house wife. (4) now after five years wife has filled the application for interim maintanance under 125, before that she has never been in any contact of husband in either way. As husband is not able to work and earn and not earning for last five years. what can be the solution. can honorable court order husband for the allowance or maintainance. What can be the solution and legal guidance for the husband? Please guide.

shivraj   05 October 2008 at 10:36

hindu marriage act.

whether the petitioner can get decree of divorce under desertion and crualty u/s-13
hindu marriage act.

whether two years deser4tion is sufficient.

shivraj   05 October 2008 at 10:24

Hindu sucession act .

as the partition took place in between husband and sons in the year 1988 whether first wife is entitled to ask partition and seperate possision?

suit is filed in the year 2002 whether it is in limitation?

whether first wife is entited to equal share in the ancestral property of husband who died pendency of suit?

shabbir   03 October 2008 at 20:53

re opening of a case

sir,
i want to know whether a case(sec 498a) settled in lok adalat can be reopened after 5 months of judgement passed in lok adalat.i.e whether the apellant has a power to apply for reopening the case.


also please let me know whether the case file d under DVC be reopened( case is actually dismissed by judge as withdrawn by the appelleant) i actually paid money and the other party agreed for settlement now they are threatening that they will reopen both the cases. can this be done. will honble court allow to reopen the cases under any circumstances

Sunil Dhiwa   03 October 2008 at 13:52

divorce paper

dear i want to give divorce to my wife for that what shold i need to do

or any one have divorce paper so i can get it

waiting for the reply

Mohit Gupta   01 October 2008 at 15:19

house property+dowery case

Case history

We are 2 brothers and 1 sister earlier lived with our parents in Agra. I got a job in pune so I shifted in pune in july2005, after one year I get married and bring my wife in pune with my parents. My sister is also live in pune with her husband. And my elder brother with his wife lives in agra in our house which is in the name of my mother.

As all of our family members live in pune & my elder brother live in agra alone and he does not have any good source of income in agra so he also come to pune in January 2007 for a job searching living his wife in agra with her consent. due to misdirected brother’s wife by her family members when my brother goes to agra in may2007, she refuse to come here and after a mutual agreement with some old family members she agree that she lives in agra with her two child and her mother i.e. my elder brother’s mother in law up to november2007 and my brother sent him Rs. 4000/- per month for domestic expenditure. After that my brother went in Agra 2 times to bring her in pune, but she refuse by saying that she will teach us a lesson in court. (As per my brother view that she has an affair with her JIJA and her JIJA insists her not to come in pune.)

Now my elder brother’s wife in that house alone and neither she vacant neither the house nor she give the divorce to my brother. This is not possible for my brother to go back in Agra.
Moreover she filed a false dowery case upon us (myself and my sister are 4-5 year separated from the Agra)


Pls if possible can anyone give me a suitable view how to come out from this situation?

We want to overcome from both the siatuation

susanth nair s   01 October 2008 at 08:09

domesticviolenceact

is there any provision under the domestic violence act for the recovery of householdingarticles and ornaments of the aggreviedperson,which is kept by the respndents plz provide latest caselaw

shivraj   30 September 2008 at 21:37

Hindu sucession act sec.6

in one case the first wife is demanded for partion in husband property which is ancestral in this time husband not supported to first wife and made will and sale deed of said property for not giving the benefit to first wife and discharge there right over property.After that wife filed civil suit against the husband for partition and demand the right over property.After few year husband died court note down following issues i.e
1.whether plaintiff proves that suit property is ancestral property of husband?
2.whether plaintiff proves that she is entited to claim partition and seperate possision in that property?if yes then her share? (imp issuee)plz reply.

Legal Fighter   30 September 2008 at 10:03

conviction for self admission for the offense of "Giving Dowry" under Dowry Prohibition Act

Hi All,

If the girl has lodged false FIR and in her FIR she has admitted of "Giving Dowry" by her family members, doesn't it make them punishable for the offense of "Giving Dowry". The police generally doesn't act on this line. How to proceed to get them convicted for this offense.

Please suggest.

Thanks & Regards,
Manish

Legal Fighter   30 September 2008 at 09:51

If Domestic Violence Act retrospective in operation?

Hi Experts,

I have read that all the newly formed statute are prospective in nature if it is not specifically mentioned that the statute is retrospective in its operation. But the courts are taking contrary view and putting the Domestic Violence Act as retrospective in operation though nothing is specifically mentioned for the same. Also Domestic Violence Act being quasi-criminal, may attract binding of Section 20 of Constitution of India for violation of fundamental right due to its retrospective operation.

Can you please provide me some supreme court judgment which clear this ambiguity of operation of a new statute?

Thanks & Regards,
Manish