A.G.Syam kumar
20 November 2011 at 17:58
Please let me know that any apex court decisions are there to establish that the statement of accounts attached to the plaint should clear and explanatory to the pleadings.Please provide me with the citation if any to that aspect.
A.G.Syam kumar
25 June 2011 at 09:25
Whether the fast track (Adhoc) courts in india are having jurisdiction to conduct trail and hearing of appeal on NDPS matters ?
if so,which notification empowers the said courts in such regard
A.G.Syam kumar
22 September 2009 at 21:31
sir,
other than the common defences that could raise such as
1. capitalisation of interest
2. penal interest
3. other hidden charges
4. non furnishing of proper stattement
what other defenses which we could raise in a suit for recovery of amount due filed by a bank ?riven
CK Nair
09 May 2009 at 14:41
Sir,
My name is CK Nair, I belongs to Kerala. We have a small house within a plot of 53 cents (more than 1/2 acres) which was purchased by my parents in 1968 and was in the joint name of my father & mother.
I have one sister also.
My mother expired in the year 1986. During 1993, my father had made a deed signed by my father, myself & sister, dividing the property as under:
Out of 53 cents & house:
33 cents & the house jointly for my father & sister.
20 cents to me.
My father expired in 2007.
In fact I have to get 26 cents if it is equally divided, but my father has shown only 20 cents for me, and remaining 33 cents + house jointly to my father & sister.
Is it possible for me to get our property of 53 cents equally divided since my father is no more, and is the deed is lawfully valid, and is my sister have the rights make any deal i.e. selling of her share without my knowledge or permission?
Since my father has passed away, shall I have the rights to get my father's share?
Please guide me sir.
A.G.Syam kumar
20 November 2008 at 14:36
in a money suit the defendant was set exparee and later as per the expartee decree the attached property of the defendant went to the hands of the plaintiff .At present the plaintiff had effected mutation over the defendant's property by virtue of the decree
Now the defendant wants to set aside the expartee decree
MY specific dout is what can i do for the defendant and how and what procedure can i take to abstain the plaintiff from further alination or exection of any other document in regrd to the property of the defendant
A.G.Syam kumar
29 October 2008 at 22:05
friends
Have your ever come across any decision of any of the h'ble high courts or h'ble supreme court regarding section 379 of ipc that without having any proper occurrence witness's deposition,a man cannot be convicted for the offense of theft soly on the base that the mentioned was arrested by the police at the time of alleged place of occurrence while the accused was seen running to get in to a bus at the bus stand
The case of the prosecution that the accused was committed theft of a bangle from a kid while the kid was kept by her mother at the time when the mother was attempted to get into a bus at the bus station.no recovery was not effected also
myself was come across with a kerala high court decision.but i could not trace out the same till date
so i am submitting to you all for your kind consideration
ESTHERPRIYA
16 October 2008 at 14:26
Hai can any body help me in stating the procedure for executing a NBW in case of inter state borders. The NBW issued court is in Mumbai but the accused against whom it is issued is in Salem.
Regards
Padmapriya
A.G.Syam kumar
09 September 2008 at 21:24
whether any ammendment made recently in the stamp act of tamilnaud which stipulates the resistration of documents which cerate mortgage by deposit of title deeds ?
A.G.Syam kumar
02 September 2008 at 19:13
Under what provision of law,the lenial descendants of a Muslim widow died intestate could effect partition ? in case if it could be made,the ratio applicable ?
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Empowering one
Is there any ruling rendered by the honble supreme court that other claiments could empower any one of the claiments to collect and receive money for and on behalf of the money due to the other claiments by filing seperate affidavits before the court.