Anonymous
08 March 2011 at 13:57
Critising via purshis on courts decisions or expressinging agony ..is it contempt?
Husband is defending his divorce case of cruelty, since last 2.8 years!
Judges are also changed in whole period.
New judge is simply harrassing me. He looks biased and prejudiced. He is using his discretionary powers only to contradict all my averments and blasts on every hearing, and does not allow me to even narrate delaying tactics by wife's lawyer.
They are all joined hands. And now started cribbing that I am still not giving up and not ready to buckle.
I WANT TO OPENLY AND ON RECORD ASK HIM WHY PREJUDICED TRETMENT IS BEING MET TO ME with all examples in six months.
Is it contempt of court to ask or state your feelings via a 'purshis'?
Judge only teaches me rules (to which he contradicts himself on subsequent date.)
Since last six months, other party is dragging the matter, and postponing 'framing of issue'
Other party produced some docs for endorsement, it was set for 'other side to say'. But no copy was given to me.
When I raised this issue in writing an application, judge pressurised me to suppress and withdraw it and
Judge said to me that 'Court decides whether to give copy to other party or not! You no longer have any adv and hence you don't know rules'
Is this correct? then what is the 'service of the process'?
Then when other party gets chance to raise preliminary objections?
Judge simply ignored 'opposite party's acts of filing things behind my back and also not giving a copy of it' , and judge went on to take their side.
There are atleast 5 instances of such incidents.
Before filign 'trasfer petition' I want to file purshis to the same judge as to express my views politely.
I know imputation on judge for 'tranfer petition' boomrangs. That's wh I would prefer to raise my agony and dipleasure with court politely and and midest possible language.
But doing so, is it a contempt of court or dictating the court about his discretionary decisions and orders?
Siva
23 August 2010 at 14:11
Dear Sir/Madam,
My case no CMP.27/2010 is pending in high court for past 7 months. Its a divorce transfer case put by my wife. My advocate says the case is not comming up for proceedings. It looks like my wife side they are delaying it intensionally.
1. Is there any way to know the status of the case. The websites http://www.courtnic.nic.in/chennai/content.asp says the case is pending and in http://causelists.nic.in/chennai_new/index1.html its not getting listed.
I would like to know if there is any way to know, when the case can be put up. By walking into the court or by meeting any person.
2. Is there any way to close this transfer case quickly. I am fine even if it gets transferred to Trichy(even though there is risk to my life). I want the divorce case to get started as soon as possible. Please let me know if there is any way to get it done.
Would kindly request to quide me on this.
yours sinserely, Siva.
09940046853
Anonymous
16 August 2010 at 22:55
just to give you a brief about the case. one of my friend's wife has filed and maintenance case in Civil as well as criminal as she ia an advocate by profession and my friend had received a divorce from her on 20 May 2010. can she still claim maintenance and my friend is an unemployed person. could please help me with the answer?
Anonymous
08 August 2010 at 16:10
'A' a 2009-10 passed Law Graduate has just enrolled himself as an Advocate with Bar Council of Delhi. As per BCI's recently announced rule, a Law Graduate who passed LL.B. in 2009-10 has to pass the Bar Examination to be held on 05 December 2010 and only after passing this Exam he can practise Law . 'A'has no source of income and as per this BCI's rule he can't practise law till passing the Bar Exam. 'A' has no other source of income .'B'( mother of 'A) a widow and getting family pension ( after the death of her husband) from one of the public corporations of Govt.of India to the tune of Rs. 7,000.00 ( seven thousand) per month.
'B' has filed complaint against her son 'A' U/S 125 for maintenance by claiming that she doesn't have any source of income while 'A' is having evidence that 'B' is getting pension from the Govt.
What would be the fate of this case.
Anonymous
07 August 2010 at 20:44
Dear sir,I got married on 09 Jul 2008. After staying together, She has filed divorce case u/s 13 which I have replied.Now she has filed case u/s 24 & asking money. Since I dont want any divorce & moreover she has filed case then why I should pay u/s 24.I stated in my replied statement saying that If she desirous, then I can give divorce.Still i would like to keep her. can U plz give ur valuable advice so that either I should start living with her or else we should get divorce since we are staying seperate for 01 year.
Regards
sandeep
Anonymous
07 July 2010 at 17:23
I am on a look out for an Advocate of Andhra Pradesh High Court for a WRIT Petition,
If their are any on this Forum please send me your details along with your Strengths and Fees details in advance, before i can take decision whom to appoint based on their merit as well as Fees Structure my mail id.
srihari.yellapu@yahoo.com,
Anonymous
30 June 2010 at 16:54
Sir,
Main apni wife ke saath life bitane ke liye bilkul tayar hun par meri wife nahi. Main apne wife ke saath sasural rahne ke liye bhi tayar hun par main apni wife se alag reh kar maintanence nahi dena chahta.Agar main maintance nahi deta to court mujhe kitne time ki punishment de sakte hai.Mere naam pe koi property or babnk balance nahi hai.
First Say to Sorry English nahi aati.
T. Saranvelu
26 June 2010 at 11:55
Sir,
I need certain clarifications on exparte divorce. Kindly go thorough the matter and kindly give valuable suggestions::
I have applied for divorce at District Family Court due mental cruely of wife. Case hearing was happened at Family court
I got EXPARTE JUDGEMENT ie divorce granted.
One day after judgment day, I have received a letter from her (Wife) high court lawyer stated that "petition filled at Hon.ble High court for transfer of the divorce case to her (WIFE) working place and stay order for four weeks for the divorce case is issued by the Hon.ble High court". Actually she (Wife) filled a petition for transfer of the divorce case and got stay at 12 days before the family court judgement day.
That is, the stay matter is not known to me and my lawyer before the judgement day. Besides, she or her lawyer is not informed the stay matter to the family court during hearing. No official court order is not received by me till now.
In that crucial matter, exparte judgement is given during stay period of Hon.ble High court (Stay matter is not known to me or family court).
I kindly asked that whether the exparte judgement is valid or not?, besides reappealing by her for exparte judgement ie 90 days is also already over at family court. Till date no reappealing by her.
Kindly give valuable suggestions and directions.
Yours
Saran
Anonymous
23 June 2010 at 18:03
Case Details:
1.Husband Filed Divorce petition at Family Court for Desertion and Cruelty.
2.Wife Filed Cr.P.C 125 at her home town while attending the Divorce case at Family Court.
3.Husband not contesting the 125 thus it would go Ex-Parte in favor of Wife.
Que is while Divorce suit not disposed and Cr.P.C 125 is disposed off Ex-Parte from other CJM Court in such a scenario CJM Order would of Interim or Final in Nature?
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Portfolio Management Services
Dear all,
1.On 17 Aug 10, I was approached by the executives of YYY Financial Intermediaries Pvt Ltd, at my residence at NEW DELHI. They offered to manage my savings and promised growth at much higher rates than those achieved in bank fixed deposits. Further, I was also shown the details of accounts of their two existing clients, whose money had grown in excess of 25% in less than one year. In light of the above, they requested me to invest my spare money with YYY for better returns.
2.However, I sought promises of absolute protection of my initial invested capital and projection of minimum growth rate for the same. In response, protection of my initial deposit amount and its growth at the minimum rate of 20% per annum were promised.
3.Thus, I agreed to open three accounts with YYY― one each for Securities, Currencies and Commodities. However, before signing the papers for the same, I verbally specified the following conditions :
(a)That all the three accounts will be kept absolutely separate from one another. Accordingly, the said three accounts and ledgers will be maintained separately; and the respective transactions statements and balance of accounts will also be provided separately.
(b)That the respective sums deposited in the said three accounts will remain the absolute limits for trading from the said respective accounts; and the amount earmarked for any one account will not be utilised for trading from any of the other accounts.
(c)That any additional amount deposited later in my YYY account would be meant only for investment (against delivery), and the same will be utilised as per specific instructions from me. Hence, under any circumstances, the said additional amount will not be utilised by any of the Dealers for trading from any of my three YYY accounts.
(d)That before executing any trades from any of my accounts, my permission would be taken; after giving me the option to choose from the best three recommendations of the Research team of YYY.
(e)That at the end of each trading day, the respective dealers separately would provide me the account status in respect of all the three accounts, along with the details of trades executed and amounts debited and/or credited, including the final amount balance in each respective accounts.
(f)That my initial invested capital invested would be protected at all costs; and all known techniques like ‘Hedging’ etc would be employed towards the same. Further, a growth rate of at least 20% pa would be ensured for my invested capital.
4.The said executives of YYY Financial Intermediaries Pvt Ltd agreed and promised to abide by all of the above conditions. Thus, I signed the documents brought by them for opening the three accounts with YYY; and issued three separate account payee checks for the same as per following details :
(a)Securities A/C: Rs 1,00,000/= (CHQ dt 17 Aug 10).
(b)Currencies A/C: Rs 20,000/= (CHQ dt 17 Aug 10).
(c)Commodities A/C: Rs 20,000/= (CHQ dt 17 Aug 10).
5.Thus, a total amount of Rs 1,40,000/= was deposited with YYY in three separate accounts. Later, for purpose of investment in stocks against delivery, I deposited an additional amount of Rs 200,000/= in my YYY a/c vide a Delhi chq dated 26 Nov 10. Further, I informed the same to all the YYY Dealers operating my said three accounts, with specific instructions not to utilise the said additional amount under any circumstances; as it was meant only for investment by me.
6.Barring a few trades in the end-Oct 10, regular trading in my Securities ac began only by 15 Nov 10. However, almost all the conditions promised and agreed upon at the time of opening of my accounts were violated with impunity. Facts regarding the same are submitted below.
7.Firstly, a definite sum was earmarked for each of the three accounts, and the same were to be maintained in separate ledgers. Accordingly, separate cheques were also collected for the same. However, the amounts earmarked for Securities and Currencies accounts were merged and kept in one single ledger. My repeated requests to correct the anomaly had little effect.
8.Secondly, the transaction statements for the said Securities & Currencies accounts were also not given separately, but merged together. This arrangement made it very difficult to decipher the transactions and activities of one account from the other, as transactions of both accounts were presented interspersed with each other in a haphazard manner. Again, my repeated requests to correct the anomaly were not entertained.
9.Thirdly, the limits imposed for trading amounts as the sums earmarked for the said three accounts were not respected; and the same were violated with such frequency as if no such limits existed. Also, the additional amount of Rs 200,000/=, which was deposited separately to be used for investment only by me, was also utilized freely by all the Dealers for trading in the said three accounts. Once again, my repeated reminders to the respective Dealers did not succeed in changing the trend.
10.Fourthly, before executing any trades from any of my accounts, my permission was to be taken; after giving me the option to choose from the best three recommendations of the Research team of YYY. However, all the Dealers invariably executed the trades first and informed me later. Also, the offer of choosing from amongst the three best recommendations was never given. In several cases, the trades were not informed to me even after execution, and information about the same was received subsequently from the Trades Confirmation Dept of the YYY. In spite of my repeated reminders, the respective Dealers did not change their ways of operating in this regard.
11.That at the end of each trading day, the respective dealers separately would provide me the account status in respect of all the three accounts, along with the details of trades executed and amounts debited and/or credited, including the final amount balance in each respective accounts. None of this was ever done as promised.
12.That my initial invested capital invested would be protected at all costs; towards which, all known techniques like ‘Hedging’ etc would be employed. Further, a growth rate of at least 20% pa would be ensured for my invested capital. However, none of this was done as promised. Instead, out of the invested capital of Rs 1,20,000/= in my Stocks and Currencies accounts, a total loss of Rs 86,897.95 was incurred to me through casual and reckless trading carried out in from mid-Nov to mid-Dec 10. Thus, only an amount of Rs 32,102.05 was paid out to me after closing the said accounts on 04 Feb 11.
13.It is submitted that in mid-Dec 10, I realised that huge losses were being incurred to my Stocks account, through irresponsible and reckless trading from my Stocks account by the concerned Dealer, Mr abc. In addition, he had also not been taking my prior concurrence before entering into certain high value and risky transactions. Hence, from 22 Dec 10 onwards, I declined to confirm the trades carried out without my prior permission. Consequently, certain loss making positions were left open; while my said account was also frozen by the concerned Trades Confirmation Dept of YYY, which further increased the said losses.
14.On 27 Dec 10 at 1130 h, Mr xyz from YYY, along with Mr abc, met me and requested me to confirm the said trades which had been carried out from my account by Mr abc without my prior permission. He agreed that an error had been committed by Mr abc. However, he added that if I did not confirm the said trades and accept losses, the losses accrued would have to be borne by Mr abc, and that he would also lose his job at YYY. However, However, I refused to accept losses on behalf of Mr abc. Then Mr xyz assured me that he would completely recover my entire losses incurred in the Stocks/Securities account within one month (i.e., by end-Jan 11). He also promised me that from thereon, he would personally handle my Stocks and Commodities accounts, and Mr abc would not be permitted to operate my Stocks/Securities account.
15.In addition, Mr xyz also made the following promises :
(a)That he would ensure that my consent is taken before execution of any trades from my a/c; and that I would be regularly informed about the YYY's Research Team's recommendations for trades.
(b)That he would provide me the status of my a/c (net/final amount balance) on each trading day.
16.Based on the promise of recovery of my losses by Mr xyz on 27 Dec 10, I agreed to confirm the trades carried out by Mr abc from 22 Dec 10 onwards. I reposed faith in Mr xyz with the hope and belief that he would fulfill the promises he made to me. However, he failed to deliver on any of his promises made to me on 27 Dec 10. Thus, the losses incurred in my Stocks/Securities account were not recovered, and I was forced to close my accounts with YYY. Finally, out of the initial invested capital of Rs 1,20,000/= in my Stocks & Currencies accounts, only an amount of Rs 32,102.05 was paid out to me after closing the said accounts on 04 Feb 11. Thus, I had to bear a total loss of Rs 86,897.95, which was in breach of the promise made to me by Mr xyz on 27 Dec 10.
17.Further, Mr abc repeatedly utilised more funds than allocated for my Stocks/Securities account, which he was authorised to operate on my behalf. In addition, several trades done carried out by him appeared to be against the obvious market trend; and hence were perhaps meant to favour certain other persons/clients. This aspect needs to be investigated.
18.In light of the above, therefore, it may kindly be clarified if a case is made out against the following :
(a)Mr xyz of YYY Financial Intermediaries Pvt Ltd, for criminal conspiracy and cheating; where in, he willfully made false promise with intention to cheat and to dishonestly persuaded me to confirm the unauthorised trades carried out from my Stocks/ Securities account by Mr abc, and thus accept losses for the same.
(b)Mr abc of YYY Financial Intermediaries Pvt Ltd, for carrying out several unauthorised, reckless and apparently dishonest trades from Stocks/Securities a/c, many of them against the obvious market trend; for repeatedly utilising more funds than allocated for trading in the account he was authorised to operate; and for failing to preserve the initial invested capital through employment of various safety measures like ‘Hedging’ etc, and thus dissolving almost the entire allocated capital in huge losses.
(c)YYY Financial Intermediaries Pvt Ltd, for allowing unauthorised, reckless and apparently dishonest trades; allowing cross utilisation of funds from all my three accounts held with them; failing to protect my capital and fulfill the promises made to me by their representatives; for willfully delaying closure of my Commodities account and refund of the amount held in the same (in spite of repeated requests); and for repeatedly refusing to provide separate statements of all the trades carried out from the said three accounts in transparent manner with intent to confuse and prevent proper understanding of the said transactions by the undersigned.
21.Accordingly, it may also be clarified whether an FIR may be lodged and suitable cases may be registered against the said persons/entities in the subject matter; or if the subject case needs to be taken up at some other level/forum. Further, the procedure in each alternative may kindly be specified.
Thanking You, With Regards.
AK Singh