Manjeet kumar sahu
24 March 2014 at 19:43
Can anyone provide me citation or judgement of this case.
Tata Finance Ltd. v. Morjan Hossain and Others
sandeep pilania
23 October 2013 at 12:24
I want to know that if any body can find any information about school through RTI in a private cbse recognised school in haryana
GANGAM.RAJENDER.
01 October 2013 at 20:17
the rape CASE has been registered u/s 376,368.victim family are the neighbors to each other the relation is only phone contacts but they (accused family)never come to the victims home.one day the victim went to some other district village the accused followed her and threatened dire consequences her and take her to some lonely place and raped her.after two moths she lodged the complaint with some documents(CONTINUATION OF HARRASHMENT AFTER THE RAPE ACT the accused forceably created divorce papers with notary which was signed by victim ,the papers consists one 100 rs bond paper and second page continuation but the victim and her husband(forced by victim husband had signed) signed on the second page not on the 100 rs paper.
A. IS this case comes under section ipc 376 or 497.
1. ipc 497:whoever has sexual intercourse with a person who is and whom he knows or has reason to believe to be the wife of another man,without the consent or "Connivance of that man", such sexual intercourse not amounting the offence of rape.
2."in the section 497 the word connivance of that man",which is equal word to SECTION IPC 375 FORTHLY :WITH HER CONSENT, WHEN THE MAN KNOWS THAT HE IS NOT HER HUSBAND, AND THAT HER CONSENT IS GIVEN BECAUSE SHE BELIEVES THAT HE IS ANOTHER MAN TO WHOM SHE IS OR BELIEVES HERSELF TO BE LAWFULLY MARRIED.
3.TELL ME THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE SECTION SHE IS THE MARRIED WOMEN.
4.IS THERE ANY CHANCE TO CHANGE THE OFFENCE AT THE TRIAL STAGE.
THANK YOU SIR.
Manjeet kumar sahu
23 March 2013 at 19:30
Delhi gangrape case: 19/03/2013, The Supreme Court issued notices to the Centre on a petition filed by Janta Party president Subramanian Swamy, seeking directions to treat the juvenile in the Delhi gangrape case as an adult, like the other four surviving accused. Dr Swamy in his petition has contended that the brute cannot be allowed to get away with his acts of utmost cruelty against a hapless young girl, simply because he is six months short of attaining the age of majority.
Under the Juvenile Justice Act,2000, a juvenile in conflict with law, cannot be sent to jail. He can be kept in a protective home.
I found that there is misuse of PIL in this particular case.This PIL is against the preamble and objective of Juvenile Justice(Care and Protection of Children) Act,2000.
JAIME
16 March 2013 at 20:37
SIR,
In My Civil Suit I had been allowed once to amend the Plaint. But after subsequent events I need to place new Orders on record with averments. Also some fact in possession remained to be added in the plaint the last time. Is there any restriction in the Law to disallow all the evidence in possession whether subsequent or previously obtained just before framing of the issues or once the issues are framed but before filing Affidavit in evidence and calling the witnesses on the withstand, so long as the amendment is based on the same cause of action and necessary to determine the question in controversy, avoid multiplicity of suits and causes no prejudice to the defendant who has the opportunity to submit his reply to the amendment?
Thanks.
mohammed imtiaz
02 March 2013 at 22:11
Respected Sir/Madam,
Please confirm that can any body challenge the signature on the document as forge after 30 year.
As the document which they are challenging is made in the year 1980.stating that there is a forge signature are there in that.
One more think as the file the case in the year 2008 as that time the document is 28 year old.
can we take the plea for sec 90 of evidence act now.
thank and regards
imtiaz
Manjeet kumar sahu
02 December 2012 at 21:02
In what context,Dowry death is different from murder?
Please throw some light as to why Dowry Death was inserted under IPC.
Is it merely because of the unprecedented growth of such kind of secret killing.
(If this is the reason Honor killing awaits at the periphery.)
I think Murder in itself can cover such offences.Creating different kind of offences will only create quandary.
ACID ATTACK IS ALSO IN VERGE OF GETTING ITS PLACE UNDER IPC.
Nitesh
26 October 2012 at 14:42
Hi,
Madras High court imposed stay on campus recruitment by public sector companies,but now public sector banks like Bank of Baroda,Punjab national bank etc has started their own course with Manipal university to Probationary officers post. This course for Post Grad. diploma in banking management which is of 1 year duration and they are offering guarantee placement with those students. This is one again against Act Right to equality ( fundamental rights recognised by the constitution ). Can we fill PIL against this.
MohammedRaffiq Bijapur
05 October 2012 at 23:51
The accused facing charge for offence u/sec.302 causing murder of his wife. the daughter of accused though has not seen the crime but deposes that her parents have no cordial relationship and night before her murder both have quarreled.
The question is whether this evidence is sufficient to convict the accused when other witness have turned hostile?
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Who can be the bailor (sureties) under sec.441 of crpc
In one of my case, The Accused have been granted bail but the session court has directed that the Bailor can only be his parent.
Now, The father of the accused has already died and The mother of the accused has no property in her name?
A Criminal Miscellaneous Petition was filed for the consideration of other person as bailor but the court did not consider it.
Any Suggestion under such circumstance.